One more reason the Egg Rocks!
?First of all, it wasn?t a Pop-Tart,? she said. ?It was a breakfast pastry."
Thank goodness it wasn't a canoli. They might have mistaken it for a rocket launcher and after labeling him a terrorist, thrown him in a cell at Guantanamo.
Whew!
Aw shucks. Now I guess I'll have to either destroy all my five generations of family photos done with white backgrounds including my parents and great-grandparents wedding photos. Hey they were sepia on white. Am I safe there?
Are we the dumbest people on the planet or do we simply allow stupid fools to run our lives, with imbecilic results?
Einstein was a patent clerk in the Swiss patent office. I'll bet he would have said something akin to "Sind Sie ein F---ing Moron?' when asked to allow a patent on this.
But then, what do I know.
Actually that's correct, but for the union quip.
The citizens who pay those high prop. taxes definitely won't put up with stupid and uncivilized behavior. The union in those towns has made the unspoken tradeoff, increased pay, more citizen involvement, higher caliber of police civility and less confrontation.
They express it to their union members as follows: You're getting better pay and benefits and the demands are greater. Deal with it or go elsewhere.
Same can be said of the teacher's situation and other.
Actually you don't; not to that extent. Head out to the NY suburbs and stupidity like that pretty much gets tossed off the force. The town's taxpayers would be very vocal. In the city there's a whole lot of insulation there. It's easier for that ignorance to exist for a longer period of time.
For those Big Apple residents who remember a decade or so ago when the Bloomberg administration was negotiating with the NYPD for a salary contract and was so proud of itself for getting the starting salary to be unbelievably LOW, this comes as no surprise. YOU GET WHAT YOU PAY FOR. Want to hire cops for the salary you'd pay a baby-sitter? It's time for US citizens to consider the quality they really want in their government employees, hospital workers, teachers, etc. Dumb is really expensive in the long run. No surprises here. And, no, I'm not a government employee.
Is there not one word missing here?
P-E-R-J-U-R-Y
Under oath?
You lie?
You're a cop?
And you are not prosecuted?
How cut and dried does this need to be?
No. Don't send him a copy of the 1st amendment. I don't think he'll read it. Instead send him a sweatshirt with the words '1st Amendment' in a large circle with a big oblique line through it. On the back in bright bold kelly green letters 'Hypocrite-in-Chief'. Who knows - he might actually wear it.
Surprised? Don't be. Isn't Indiana the state that at one point (1930's) thought about passing a law making pi = 3? Instead of 'easy as pie' they were looking for 'pi as easy'. Luckily someone explained the absurd ramifications of denying mathematical reality. I guess the lesson didn't stick. Oh well.
Try this on for size:
START-
Defund public education.
UNinvest in public schools.
THEN (you get people who) -
Believe Climate = Weather
Believe Science = Faith & Opinion
Don't believe Cause >> Effect
GOTO START
(and run the scenario again until we prove Darwin was correct by disappearing)
Hmmm. Should I think twice the next time I bank online, or buy something online? RSA broken? Credit card encryption still valid? Did the NSA get to do what so many hackers failed to do? Bring down all monetary transactions on the internet? Remember the discussions decades ago about breaking the encryption? 64 bits then 128, then 256. Where exactly does that put us now?
What's missing here? A lawyer taking a wrongful arrest case? Can it be that no enterprising legal eagle sees a totally winnable case here? I'm a bit confused.
Shaming a gun manufacturer? Wow, That's a challenge.
This keeps going back to the question of what's worse: A president who probably never read the constitution violating it daily, or a president who was a constitutional scholar replicating the actions of the former. There is NO excuse for the latter.
This is nothing but a natural outgrowth of the digital age. In former industrial times goods were valuable and ownership of machinery was prized and protected. In this digital age information [think ones and zeros]is of far more value than mere tangible goods. It is only natural that the owners of those ones and zeros would do their utmost to tie them up, increase their value and go to outlandish lengths to protect them. Watch as inmates convicted of dealing in pot are increasingly let out of jails and the cells are filled with file [ones and zeros] downloaders. Copyright violators will inevitably become criminalized. Scary?
I guess no more Hamlet, Shakespeare, etc. Depictions of some pretty nasty s--t. What about all the C.S.I. dramas? What are they drinking down south?
At that point we would have an actual broken internet. Almost inconceivable, yet truly worrisome.
Think this is a problem? What if they finally manage to break RSA encryption? Who will bank online, buy online, or trade stocks online then? The whole internet economy (read 'BIG')is based on the belief that RSA is currently unbreakable.
And now for the final nail
The only thing left is the imposition of a Lettre de Cache. That's where Louis XVI signed the letter deeming you guilty and tossing you in the Bastille. Seems like we're getting pretty damn close to that now.