And seemingly unaware? his response sounds more like he was perfectly up to date on how these things work.
Puting photos you don't want the world see online (automated backups doubly so) is a bad idea and doing so whilst being a person of interest just makes the inevitable occur promptly.
Though his statements on copyright are about as bad as you'd expect.
Encrypting those websites would increase the amount of encrypted traffic hurting the collect everything mentalities, that and if ranked higher for encryption then why not down for using a faulty implementation?
still it seems like unlikely Google would do such a thing but they could do the same for torch and burn/ salt the earth policies, as that would help services re-establish elsewhere after burning the original to the ground.
strawman?
This reads like the satanic temple found a case to lose so they can diminish the rights of other churches (or ensure they don't gain any over time)
He sounds perfect for the job
And seemingly unaware? his response sounds more like he was perfectly up to date on how these things work.
Puting photos you don't want the world see online (automated backups doubly so) is a bad idea and doing so whilst being a person of interest just makes the inevitable occur promptly.
Though his statements on copyright are about as bad as you'd expect.
Re: bad idea
Encrypting those websites would increase the amount of encrypted traffic hurting the collect everything mentalities, that and if ranked higher for encryption then why not down for using a faulty implementation?
still it seems like unlikely Google would do such a thing but they could do the same for torch and burn/ salt the earth policies, as that would help services re-establish elsewhere after burning the original to the ground.
Trust
-the internet (or at least it's protocols) is based on trust
That may just be the beginning and end of the whole problem