This is exactly what I thought too - a single redaction, thus less information gets out.
The government seems to enjoy being antagonistic towards those who own them.
Sadly, sling bundling ESPN is a waste. I'd love to pay ~7 less a month for sling.
" Targeting supposed terrorists or even spying on another Governments is one thing and it is perfectly understandable"
Truly, is it? Have people ever reached the conclusion that hey, maybe no spying is ever ok? Government, terrorism, none of it is ever acceptable. Mostly because none of it is going to follow the actual defined versions. Government is going to target every government employee, civilian or otherwise. Every person on the planet is considered a terrorist because they have opinions and terrorists have opinions.
So no, not any spying is understandable - and we have ourselves solely to blame.
How is this a deal when it's on amazon for the same price?
I'm all for supporting techdirt deals, but umm...this isn't one.
"price over quality"
What they mean is the other way around.
Unlimited data is the only thing that reflects on their quality.
I constantly reuse the $0 I've spent over the last 5 years on DVD/Blu-RAy alone.
I also probably have as good or more extensive of a collection than you do, with none of the restrictions!
You are part of the problem.
Something something sony case about restricting linux.
Are we looking at a hilariously large class action against DVDCCA/AACS about how you owned it when you bought it, but not now? Because if I can't even own the DVD of a movie I buy then it's sure as hell not worth even the $5 in the bargain bin.
the term is loadsamoney. www.youtube.com/watch?v=ON-7v4qnHP8
Here's the thing. Boies is clearly in this for $$. They have done great things in the past too, such as defend Novell vs Microsoft in other cases.
Was it just a fluke that doing so was the one time they were remotely ethical/not garbage?
There's an easier way to sum up/explain what zero rated apps do:
they turn the internet into AOL online.
So facebook = aol online
google = aol online
Why would people want that?
You'll have a hard time making an argument that google somehow is monopolizing search when you can search using anything you want, as noted.
The irony is that lots of search engines do this same thing as google: bing promotes google partners, yahoo promotes bing and thus bing partners, etc.
Maybe she could start looking on wikipedia?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_government_mass_surveillance_projects
Uh, you remember how NIST is the group that has been compromised by the NSA on a multitude of levels?
I wouldn't rely on NIST any more than I'd suggest relying on what NIST represents, such as FIPS - which happens to be mandated on every machine and is basically an imaginary wishlist of "your machines/processes are secure!"
Yep, but guess how long it's going to take to get that run through the system?
Longer than the year, I presume.
Aha, indeed. Just like how they "can't" label you a suspect for witnessing a crime.
I think the answer is obvious: don't tell the feds anything unless you have evidence yourself and deal with it privately. Which is sad, because that supports Churches in this case taking precedence in making legal decisions.
You're not missing anything by skipping broadcast tv or cable TV.
That's what's called "an improvement in quality", not the opposite. What with speeding up of tv shows to cram more ads and other similarly obtuse behaviors.
I agree, when I read "think tank", the first thought is "overpaid/willfully ignorant group of politically minded individuals". Blame the bad ones for that.
No wonder sling.tv moved forward (from directTV). They're probably preventing ATT from eliminating directTV, by creating sling.
I now see why this has ramped up so fast after the Aereo lawsuit.
undercover lobbyist?
Maybe they should call him an undercover lobbyist? Comcast double agent? Professional snake oil salesman?