There are two different kinds of Leaks of Classified information.
1. A person who swore to maintain the secrecy of classified information reveals it to the public.
2. A person who swore to maintain the secrecy of classified information reveals it to the public.
In leak number 1, the fact the the government is creating an apparatus to become a police state is kept as a secret. In leak number 2., the the public becomes aware that the government is becoming a police state.
Leak number 1 can go overlooked. Leak number 2 cannot be overlooked.
His Brian also allowed him to write:
> protest when people start telling you your
> not allowed to speak
Your never going too get you're weigh on this.
Their are just two many people out they're using there words wrong too get to upset.
Sew don't loose you're cool about it.
You can sea mini common examples that exist of incorrect usage.
People pick the write words two use according too there porpoises.
But you'd have two be a fool to begin or end a sentence with the word "but".
And only an idiot would begin or end a sentence with "and".
And a preposition is a very bad word too end a sentence with.
you have to protest when people start telling you your
> not allowed to speak even if they are not stopping you!
Nobody is telling you that you are not allowed to speak.
But people can tell you to speak your mind elsewhere.
I would immediately jump to your defense if I actually believed your freedom of speech were in danger. It is not. Your ultimate remedy would be to set up your own website and speak all you want to. Yes, really! Attract vast numbers of people from far and wide who want to come and hear your wiz-dumb.
I won't try to refute it. To merely state it again is to refute it.
Comcast injects ads into unencrypted traffic, because "it's a courtesy, and it helps address some concerns that people might not be absolutely sure they're on a hotspot from Comcast".Ok, you can stop laughing now. Stop it! Stop it, I say!
Let the Senate fight it out. Give them all the weapons they need.
When they're all gone, vote new ones in. Let the old ones be an example of what not to do.
Guilty as ACCUSED. No due process needed. Off with their heads.
The first time they're ALLEGED to infringe.
And not to forget Consumer Research.
Sick Strikes doesn't work.
Never did work.
But what if I use the Internet and DO NOT use the web at all?
Copyright is to promote the useful arts and science according to the US Constitution.
Piracy is too benign a term for what the RIAA does to artists.
Piracy is too harsh a term for copyright infringement done by fans.
they need to do two things:
> stop being awful, and change the names of the companies.
If you give them two things, they will consider it a choice. Executives will pick "change the name", decree that the problem is fixed, and continue being awful.
If you give them one thing: stop being awful
they will have to actually think about it, even if the thought of treating customers well makes the executives very uncomfortable.
This proves that the DMCA is insufficient to protect content owners from embarrassment online and why we need SOPA and stronger forms of censorship to be enacted into law.
If Konami did not use the DMCA to censor this video, then what incentive would others have to create new and original forms of censorship?
Verizon is envious of the speeds that dialup AOL users once enjoyed and would like to improve their network to match.
It is twenty years too late.
One more in a vastly long series of 'anomalies' where copyright proves itself to be a censorship tool.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Troublesome certificates...
The day that Verizon abuses it's CA power to impersonate websites is the day that some browsers, especially Mozilla and Chrome, will drop Verizon's CA trust completely.
That will suddenly mean that all of Verizon's CA signed certificates look suspicious to millions of users.
Suddenly everyone who ever bought a certificate from Verizon will get a new one from a different CA, and possibly sue Verizon for making their old certificate suddenly worthless.