I'm not surprised, since the best solutions make me forget that piracy is an option. In this case, the industry starting running ads for it!
Maybe this will make Congress so mad that they'll confirm an FCC commissioner. That'll show them - go get 'em fellas!
You'd think that folks who are worried about having real guns be taken away wouldn't be so quick to call for taking away virtual ones, but here we are, having watched it happen for three decades...
That seems like a reasonable guess about how that might work, and if they provided an explanation like that, it might help. As it stands, it's pretty close to "you have nothing to worry about if you have nothing to hide." So weird that people aren't cool with that...
Getting flagged for password sharing when I'm not and getting dinged with a new fee would be a pretty big middle finger, so it got me thinking: what will I might miss about Netflix if that happens and I want to rage quit? And that got me thinking: why am I paying for Netflix now?
Can we have law that holds ISPs liable for misstating broadband coverage?
Ok... can we have a law that requires consumers to disclose broadband availability to each other, and holds real estate sellers liable for misstating broadband coverage?
Legislature: This is fine
Kinda shows who they're afraid of, huh?
Do they somehow not have video conferencing in South Korea? If having everyone watch prerecorded video that can tolerate some buffering brings their ISPs' networks down, it's gonna blow their minds when remote workers fire up a flurry of real time videos feeds at roughly the same time at the start of the work day...
One thing that continues to confuse me in cases like this: why would officers ever think that deleting a video is the right thing to do?
If making the video is not a crime, and the content of the video isn't illegal, it's nothing more than destroying someone else's data. Would a reasonable officer really think it's ok to confiscate a device and arbitrarily delete content on it?
Perhaps they tried to delete it because they thought (correctly or not) that some aspect of either making or possessing the recording was a crime. But, if so, wouldn't that be deliberate destruction of evidence? Reasonable officers know that destroying evidence isn't ok - that's a big part of what exigent circumstances are all about.
I too would like to hear this argued before the Supreme Court - clearly I'm missing something...
"The question of compelled speech is also unconvincing"
Social media companies don't want to host this stuff, but the government is telling them they have to.
I guess the "question" is: how is that not compelled speech?
Been spendin' most their lives,
Livin' in the tweeter's paradise
Unless these cities have a contract/agreement with these streaming companies, it sounds like they're just loudly and publicly declaring that these companies should give them money.
I guess I've never tried that myself to see if it works. Maybe later, preferably when my neighbor isn't using the garden hose
Shouldn't the officers' "training and Experience" told them that shoplifters often commit more that one crime? That would've lead them to check on thefts from other retailers to try to establish a pattern. Wouldn't they have known that the thieves frequently sell or trade stolen merchandise? That might have meant that they would have tried to track down the stolen goods to see where they came from.
This just seems like lazy investigative work, and it feels negligent too, since an innocent person payed a price
He promptly unlocked his phone and removed the passcode upon upon being asked for it by law enforcement I trust?
Instead, may I suggest that we start naming certain bodily functions after the people responsible for filling this? Think it over while I take a quick Chu...
Certain folks are going to be mad about how this affects the monkey and typewriter industries...
When he brings up software updates - is he asking phone makers to add a feature that uploads all of your data from your encrypted phone to a remote server? I think that's already a thing...
Maybe it's just too much work for him to learn about it and figure out how it works for law enforcement.
So, I just pulled up "Summertime" on YouTube and started beatboxing to it. I don't want to alarm anyone, but it just... worked. YouTube didn't crash, my phone didn't catch on fire, nothing. I was assured that copyright could prevent this. Maybe I have powers.
Even Equifax wasn't on the hook for a billion dollars. I don't know which 10,017 works were shared, but apparently they're worth more than our social security numbers and credit card numbers
Thirty year war?
(Although in fairness, the last four years have definitely felt more like sixteen)