so instead of whining about it, why not submit some prior art examples and stop the patent?
"Now, let us all bow our heads in payment." --Douglas Adams, Life, The Universe, & Everything
I am in awe of the speech and even moreso of the poor bastard who edited that.
*slow clap that is joined by others*
Frak off.
Also, Bud Selig can eat a bag of dicks.
Just keepin' it real.
What is the ruling of a moron judge in a hurry?
As silly a rebuttal as that is, it still makes more sense than this ruling.
That's like locking people up because they tell you which house on the block is the crack house.
On the one hand, this is ridiculous. On the other hand, any time I see artists suing distributors I get a case of the warm fuzzies.
Win/win, I guess.
"At some point, your resolve wares down..."
Punny?
Y'know how to avoid this kind of publicity? Don't rape people.
Jackass.
Real world police for real world problems. This is a case of allocation of bits on someone's computer.
And yeah, I get that the line gets blurry, but this isn't one of those times. Habbo could make this right with a keystroke. At most, this is a civil complaint.
"I'm sorry, but some of these kids have payed hundreds if not thousands of pounds for these items..."
So what? Take it up with Habbo. Don't waste my tax dollars over this crap.
More like they'll actually do some work, instead of waiting until their patents are about to run out and then making some minor tweak.
And if not, what's the loss?
"He kicks it off by noting that unauthorized copies of music represent a huge percentage of the music that people listen to these days."
Actually, the bulk of my listening is from people who freely put it on the web.
As is the case, oddly, with my webcomic viewing.
What have we learned?
"... they'd get exactly the same results they do now. But they'd be blowing a hell of a lot less money and time on getting those results."
How would that help the MPAA? As opposed to the studios that *fund* the MPAA.
It's busywork. It's "Hey, look, we're doing something with your money. Something really productive. Trust us, this is why you need us."
Once the 'inducing infringement' standard was enacted, it was pretty damn clear that any statement that *might possibly if seen in a certain light* induce infringement was fair game.
And that's when the game is lost. Because then its a matter of court costs and lawyer fees. The average Joe is lost. Shit, GOOGLE folds when confronted by a bunch of Belgium newspapers. (Belgium. Newspapers.)
Obviously, if Time Warner objects to disclosing user names, it encourages terrorist pirate child pornographers to flock to their service, thus they are encouraging TPCP. QED.
What about the other way 'round? The joke was obvious enough to me that I knew the puncline halfway through. Did I hear it before? Trek isn't a subject that's been unexplored, after all.
Did Oswalt diligently examine the literature (fanzines, and the like) to ensure his contribution was original? Did he footnote any relevant findings?
"But the social mores say you don't tell a story about something that happened to you -- especially in an academic setting -- if they didn't actually happen to you."
Yeah, I can see that being a point of objection.
I read it more like a 'roast' of a particular professor than something that actually happened. Since I'm an old skool geek and saw that punchline coming a mile away I figured it was in jest. But I can see someone taking it seriously. Still, overreact much?
(Also, if Kirk ordered Spock to fire the phasers, there would be a damn good reason for it, and Spock would do it. The premise of the punchline is flawed. /geekout)
The kid is not a comedian, for crying out loud, he's giving a speech and repeats a joke. That's pretty much how you do those things.
I appreciate the need for citation and attribution in academic work, but for a valedictorian speech? I don't think it's going to be cited in any research papers. (Well, now it might show up in some sociological paper, but that's besides the point.)
And then the cyber entities, tired of this bullying, band together and form Skynet.
Re: Re: That legalese has more holes than a colander
"No one said the AG is a criminal."
No, he's saying that the 'request' is bogus and should be treated as such (of course, you'll likely get hit with the court hammer since the AG has little accountability.)