"so long as you don't illegally use their patented seed."
Or have neighbors that use their seeds or pick up the seeds from a third party.
"but to the extent we can control what we copy," ... "it's a false narrative to say that 'we all do it.'"
You contradict yourself in the same sentence. That is partly what they're talking about.
1:50 in: "The videos will be up on Youtube and Vimeo with a pre-license to do whatever you want with it, no copyright"
So, yeah, party on.
Mojang tweeted about this today. Their servers weren't compromised by this, but the load balancers from Amazon were. That suggests that the Amazon cloud was at risk and anything that used it should probably have their users change their passwords.
"But it's not the type of phrasing most people would have done."
I would have. Overly strong emotion and law making should not mix. When they do we get laws that do more harm then good. If I truly thought that someone was too emotional to do their job, I would say as such.
Speaking of too emotional, a lot of people are jumping on the statement saying it's sexist. But instantly jumping to the defense just because it's a man saying something to a woman is just as sexist. Show me something more and I'll be with you, but one sentence does not a sexist make.
All he has to do is wait a few years and everyone will be blaming the next guy.
I'm all for blaming Obama for not doing anything about it, but don't let that take the blame off of those who started this.
I think AC might be talking about something more proactive. Maybe being able to claim that the uploader owns all copyright to the content during upload. That way, when something like this comes along, the counter notice has already been set and it would need to go to the next step.
I like that idea. "I attest, under risk of loss of account, that I own all copyright to the uploaded content or that I have readily available proof of license to the content uploaded." Should probably throw something in there about fair use, bu that's a gray area and should probably be handled in a case by case bases.
Isn't that exactly what their censoring was originally created for? Taking down things that are in opposition to the government's stance? It's still hypocrisy even if they're open about it.
"One thing that bothers me about Windows is the fact that Windows 8 computers no longer comes with a re-installation disk."
That's not a limitation of Windows 8, that's a limitation of the manufacturer. HP got rid of the recovery CDs back near the end of the XP days.
I'm a network administrator as I said, so I'm not the average user ether. I use a range of programs from video games to professional programs like ACT. I've only ever been asked for administrative access to run a program a hand full of times. Mostly with open source software.
I agree with AC up there, most things should not require administrative access. But what you think, what I think, what AC thinks doesn't matter. All that matters is how the system is going to be used, and that is how it would be used if Unix was king.
It's the human element that you hear about every now and then. People will use the system in this way. Changing the skin isn't going to change the people.
As far as I know, Windows is not a requirement for being spied upon. The governments of the world are tapping into the back end, not the user OS. Unix is not going to help with that.
The limited user thing in Windows is a copy of it's counterpart in Unix. It works the same, and provides the same annoyances. If Unix took over, the average user would just run as root or get into the habit of using sudo before everything.
That problem is with the end user, not the OS.
As a network administrator that runs Windows 2008 Terminal Services, UAC is not that big of a problem. If you're running software that requires administrative access just to run, you're probably running the wrong software. It'd be like software asking for the root password in Unix just to run. It shouldn't be happening.
"It just lets you get rid of it by reverting to a snapshot of the system prior to the presence of software"
I use the backup and recovery tools built into windows to do that now. I know it's in Windows 7, but I think it's been built into Windows since Vista, possibly XP. Hell, I do that when it's just time to start fresh, faster then loading the OS and drivers from CD.
There's also the System Restore function that I'm also fairly sure was built into XP, but that only does system files. That's another thing that's saved several computers from Viruses in my Tech support history. I don't like using it though, it potentially leaves the original, bad file on the disk where the Backup and Recovery tool overwrites the entire drive.
The reason he probably went for Creative Commons instead of regular copyright is because getting a CC registered is free.
We don't need net neutrality laws, we need more competition.
Look at Pittsburgh (where I live now). We have at last count 6 different ISPs to choose from all offering broadband (3 DSL, 1 coax, and 2 fiber). When Comcast started capping downloads, never happened here. When the six strikes thing started, never happened here. Bittorrent throttling never happened here. If our ISP pisses us off, we can just say screw them and pick a different one (three of them are confirmed dumb pipes).
Sure, Apple can approve what it wants, but that just means we can't sue them for it. We sure as hell can make fun of them for it. And we should. If we just let people continue to be wrong without pointing it out, nothing will change (Or worse, it'll get worse).
Isn't that how RoboCop started? Detroit ran out of money so they had to get OCP to pay for the cops?
I was a witness to a car wreck a few weeks ago and agreed to testify in court. Two days ago I got paperwork stating that I'm the one being charged. Now I have to pay money to get a lawyer to get this fixed.
Yeah, being a good citizen kinda sucks.
Re: Re: Re:
Maybe we know more about the Monsanto controversies then you give us credit for. Yes, Monsanto has a EULA for their seeds. Yes, they've sued people for having seeds blow into non-Monsanto farms. Yes, they've sued people for planting legally purchased seeds that were Monsanto's (but not bought from Monsanto).
Do a quick search on Techdirt for "Monsanto" and you'll find two pages of articles about them.