The Devil's Coachman 's Techdirt Comments

Latest Comments (910) comment rss

  • On the post: Big, Big Loss For Righthaven: Reposting Full Article Found To Be Fair Use

    The Devil's Coachman ( profile ), 21 Mar, 2011 @ 08:46am

    and you got your law degree where?

    Yeah, didn't think so.

  • On the post: US Copyright Group Drops A Bunch Of Cases… But Will It Refile?

    The Devil's Coachman ( profile ), 21 Mar, 2011 @ 05:20am

    Re: Re: Depends on PIracy

    You give new meaning to the word pointless.

  • On the post: How Dan Snyder's 'Libel' Suit Against Unflattering Article Demonstrates Need For Federal Anti-SLAPP Law

    The Devil's Coachman ( profile ), 18 Mar, 2011 @ 04:55am

    Dan Snyder is a festering sack of monkey dung!

    Not only that, as a result of his condition, he has been reported by some to smell like major ass. That, coupled with the fact that he is a complete and total douchebag, and his football team fellates iguanas, adds up to one pretty complete loser and buttwipe, in my opinion. Think he'll sue me for this? Go ahead and try, beeyotch!

  • On the post: Inauspicious Start For Chris Dodd At MPAA; Starts Off With 'Infringement No Different Than Theft' Claim

    The Devil's Coachman ( profile ), 17 Mar, 2011 @ 06:43am

    Gee, an elected representative acting as industry lackey? Can't be!

    It's pretty common, if not universal, for duly elected representatives to disown or abandon their constituencies the moment they take office. This is just yet another case, among many, many, many cases. It's how things work in DC and elsewhere, and always will. Money talks, period.

  • On the post: Bev Stayart Loses Yet Again In Her Quixotic Quest To Blame Search Engines For Search Results She Doesn't Like

    The Devil's Coachman ( profile ), 17 Mar, 2011 @ 06:34am

    Here's another association

    I think that her name should also bring up references to "stupid cow".

  • On the post: Barnes & Noble Forbids Photos & Word Of Mouth Promotion With Bogus Copyright Claim

    The Devil's Coachman ( profile ), 17 Mar, 2011 @ 06:31am

    I guess B&N wants to join Borders

    Looks like they are planning on spending some quality time with the crew from Borders in bankruptcy court, at least to me.

  • On the post: Dutch Chief Of Police Suggests National DNA-Database For All Citizens

    The Devil's Coachman ( profile ), 15 Mar, 2011 @ 10:21am

    Re:

    But, but......it's for the children! It's against terrorism! It will make life so........utopian.

  • On the post: Dutch Chief Of Police Suggests National DNA-Database For All Citizens

    The Devil's Coachman ( profile ), 15 Mar, 2011 @ 10:19am

    You can really overlook the obvious, can't you?

    How is anyone's DNA private, since people leave traces everywhere they go? It's actually a very simple answer - all of that DNA has no recorded correlation to any single individual, and until it does, as this idiot police chief suggested, there is all the privacy you need. How you overlooked that simple fact is beyond comprehension.

  • On the post: French Court Tosses Ridiculous Criminal Complaint By Israeli Against An American Over Book Review By A German

    The Devil's Coachman ( profile ), 07 Mar, 2011 @ 09:12am

    Can you say, "Stupid Cow!"?

    What a ditz! She certainly got what she deserved, although a much higher judgement would have been preferred. It's moronic litigation like this that makes me disgusted with the legal "profession", and even standing next to creatures such as this would make me feel unclean. What a contemptible failure of a human being this idiot is!

  • On the post: Can A Judge Force A Juror To Reveal Facebook Account Info?

    The Devil's Coachman ( profile ), 08 Feb, 2011 @ 03:44pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    That's why you're not a judge, and never will be. As a matter of fact, based on your obvious lack of legal knowledge, you should also never be on a jury. It's clueless buffoons such as yourself that contaminate the jury pool in the US, and a stop needs to be put to it.

  • On the post: Redskins Owner Sues Local Paper Over Satirical Listing Of Grievances… Making Sure More People Read It

    The Devil's Coachman ( profile ), 04 Feb, 2011 @ 03:26pm

    My God! He's an even more gigantic douche than I ever thought possible.

    My last post about that miserable, sub-human sack of monkey dung named Dan Snyder was so off the mark that I am completely embarrassed to have submitted it. It was simply based on his suit and nothing more. How little I knew then! I then read the column linked in this article, and by the time I got to the letter F, I could hardly stand to read any more. But I persevered, and it gave me an insight into douche baggery that I could never have imagined possible, all of it stemming from one galactic scale douche whose equal may never be found - Dan Snyder! Holy frigging shite!

    One creature, the source of such epic douche baggery that residents of neighboring galaxies must be laughing in contempt and derision at the entire Milky Way. The shame! This can never be explained or rationalized, but simply borne by the rest of us for eternity. It makes me ashamed to be a carbon based life form, knowing that we collectively allowed this to happen, and did nothing to prevent or stop it.

  • On the post: Redskins Owner Sues Local Paper Over Satirical Listing Of Grievances… Making Sure More People Read It

    The Devil's Coachman ( profile ), 04 Feb, 2011 @ 02:46pm

    Dan Snyder is the biggest douche bag in the universe

    He needs to be pimp-slapped into a quivering, whimpering, panties-pissing heap on the ground, and then have his teeth kicked out on the curb. And that's before this latest outburst of idiocy came to light! What a whining bunghole he always was and will be. He is a pimple on a hemorrhoid of the anus of the universe, and should be popped. Anyone who has the opportunity to kick him in the balls and fails to take advantage of it should be sent to Gitmo for life. What a punk-ass beeyotch he is! BTW, I am a lifelong NY Giants fan, in case nobody guessed. Other than that, I have no quarrel with the man.

  • On the post: Georgia Considering Law To Let Police Monitor Any Medicine You Buy

    The Devil's Coachman ( profile ), 11 Jan, 2011 @ 01:43pm

    Re:

    Just so long as you set up a system where you keep the drug users caged up, and away from access to things like car keys, weapons, and other people's money, fine! You OK with that? I sure don't want to share the road with meth-heads, crack-heads, pot-heads, and junkies of every stripe, and the only way they should ever be given access to weapons is for suicide, where they only can pull the trigger, not hold the weapon. Since they would doubtless have to pay for these drugs, then they should not be in a position where they could steal the money from the usual collection of defenseless, elderly and disabled, and once they run out of money, they should get to spend the rest of their worthless, addled lives trying to cadge another hit of whatever from one of their fellow druggies, until they too run out of cash, or simply kill them for being so annoying. When they're all out of money, they and the remaining dope should be bulldozed into a compactor, pressed into bulk cardboard packaging, put onto barges, taken 100 miles off the coast, and sunk. Problem solved! Now that's a modest proposal. You could take the same principles and apply them to other societal parasites, such as the multi-DUI convicted, innocent bystander-killing drunkards and losers, and whatever other dregs of the world you can dredge up. The possibilities are endless.

  • On the post: Georgia Considering Law To Let Police Monitor Any Medicine You Buy

    The Devil's Coachman ( profile ), 11 Jan, 2011 @ 01:30pm

    Re:

    It does, but law-breaking by law-makers is routine practice in this country. This is only one example out of thousands and thousands. The government always has the best interest of the governed at heart, so if breaking existing laws by creating other laws is deemed proper by them, they will do it. Most of the slack-jawed morons who propose pointless malarkey like this honestly have no idea how stupid it is, and neither do their constituents. We have become a nation of docile sheep, lapping up whatever BS our favorite politicos shovel at us, because thinking critically is just too damned hard for most, and it detracts from watching NASCAR, NFL, and MLB, etc.

  • On the post: Georgia Considering Law To Let Police Monitor Any Medicine You Buy

    The Devil's Coachman ( profile ), 11 Jan, 2011 @ 01:23pm

    Re:

    As far as I'm concerned, sudafed and a whole bunch of other OTC drugs should be prescription only. It's not like they're all perfectly safe to take without limit, and most people are not knowledgable enough to determine if any of them are safe for them personally. Having a long history of cardiac rhythm problems, I found out the hard way that sudafed was not a good medication for me to take, and if I had understood that beforehand, I would not have been so foolish.

    There are many OTC drugs that people treat like Tic-Tacs, and many are not without the potential for significant morbidity and mortality, whether it be due to drug interactions with other drugs, alcohol, etc. or the accidental overdose threshold is very low. Nobody ever reads the fine print labels or the package inserts, and the classic American medical belief is that if one pill is good, then maybe four is better. People overdose routinely on things as mundane as aspirin (yes, I did that, too - when pain gets bad enough and you don't have any percocet or vicodin, you'll pound as many aspirin down as you can to stop it).

    The question still remains, which drugs can be sold OTC without significant adverse outcome effect potential, and which cannot? I sure can't answer that, and it seems the only determinant of that is the FDA and the all-powerful drug lobbies. I don't really know what the best approach is, given the never ending debate about it within the medical community, but that particular drug has enough misuse and abuse potentia, and a long history, l to warrant making it RX only.

  • On the post: The Amazing Ability Of People To Simply Ignore Data That Proves What They Believe Is Wrong

    The Devil's Coachman ( profile ), 09 Jan, 2011 @ 06:44am

    All "discussions" about sports require that logic, reason, and intellect be put aside, and only emotions are permitted. That's the way it's always been, and always will be. If you scream louder than the other guy, and longer, why then you win the argument! End of story. Oh, extra points for name calling, and casting aspersions on the opponent's family history and sexual practices, particularly those involving circus animals.

  • On the post: TSA Punishes Pilot For Videotaping Security Problems At Airports

    The Devil's Coachman ( profile ), 25 Dec, 2010 @ 08:39pm

    To Darryl: please try spell check sometime. Too bad that won't help much!

    Hey, Darryl. Looks like you're off your meds again! Your furious posting pace, liberally strewn with spelling, grammar, and syntax errors makes me think that you are actually good old Scott, three sheets to the wind, or maybe off his anti-psychotic meds, or perhaps both. Congratulations! You have achieved new heights, or perhaps depths in illogic, incoherence, and idiocy! I won't waste another moment of my time responding to your obviously deranged spew, other than to take note that you are a complete idiot, incapable of critical thought, as a direct result of your not having completed school past the sixth grade. Merry Christmas, Zippy. Continue upholding the pinhead principles you so honor. Have another beer. I guess after you failed your GED test for the fortieth or fiftieth time, you finally found your true calling - pointless rants on the InterWebs, eh? Buh-bye!

  • On the post: TSA Punishes Pilot For Videotaping Security Problems At Airports

    The Devil's Coachman ( profile ), 25 Dec, 2010 @ 07:10am

    Re: Re: Re: Still Not Legal

    Why would anyone want to do that? Writing letters to DHS is like writing letters to Santa Claus. You don't seem to have a real understanding of how your government works, do you?

  • On the post: TSA Punishes Pilot For Videotaping Security Problems At Airports

    The Devil's Coachman ( profile ), 25 Dec, 2010 @ 07:07am

    Re: Re: Re: Freedom isn't Free

    Talk about ranting - that's all you seem to do. You're obviously a TSA shill trying to gull everyone into believing that what they do actually has real-world value sufficient to justify their gigantic budget and disgustingly intrusive practices. And then you had to throw the anti-Obama crap in for good measure. Gee, I'm shocked! Shocked!

    Your "real world" doubtless involves tinfoil hats, one-world government conspiracies, and boogeymen under everyones' beds, which DOD, DHS and TSA will surely protect us from, if we only consent to be stripped of our privacy and dignity every time we wish to travel. Oh, and if they want to intercept our mail and telecommunications, that's probably OK with you too. I'm sure you're also in favor of full-cavity searches and water-boarding all passengers until they confess to anything you want them to.

    Listen up, fascist-boy (hey, if you can call me anarchist, I can respond in kind), I and many others don't agree with your paranoid delusions, and that doesn't make us anarchists, communists, socialists or pinkos of one stripe or another. Expressing whatever other political beliefs that disagree with yours is the thing that seems to put you into your typical ranting tailspin. Now scurry off to your bomb shelter and light your aluminum tree while trying to enjoy the holiday despite the fact that many people think you're full of it. And try not to grind your teeth too hard.

  • On the post: TSA Punishes Pilot For Videotaping Security Problems At Airports

    The Devil's Coachman ( profile ), 25 Dec, 2010 @ 04:59am

    Re: Freedom isn't Free

    Freedom isn't free? Nice little bit of total malarkey there, pal. Not only is it not free, it no longer exists once you choose to fly. However, the resultant lack of freedom is pretty darned expensive, from what I can see. Stop confusing freedom with restriction, as it is a contradiction.

    You are obviously one of the hopelessly deluded who believes that there actually are legitimate and working avenues for resolving painfully obvious problems in government agencies, and either never worked in government yourself, or you're just another TSA shill, which is more likely. Here's a clue - in government agencies of all types in this country, the bearers of negative facts are invariably punished for that. "Ignore that man behind the curtain! The great and powerful Oz will protect us all!"

    In terms of idiocy, I think you surpass this pilot, as well as most people, in every respect. You're the one who should be feeling shame, but I gather you have no shame at all. Merry Christmas, fool!

Next >>