Anti-personnel mines. (Yes, I know that the USA has declined to sign that treaty.)
I'm an old retired geezer, who's worked in several different fields -- from outdoors physical to office work -- and I have never, not once, heard this "origin story" ever before. Naturally, this makes me a little suspicious. And in fact, a quick web-search indicates that "flipping the bird" has been recognized as a vulgar insult since at least the ancient Greeks (and occasionally, in some cultures) as a gesture to ward against "the evil eye". So I can't help but wonder if this "Just So" tale about the one-finger salute having once been, or plausibly being considered, a threat, might actually be just a newly invented narrative in service of an agenda.
Arguably, one of the most effective ways to pressure "the system" to implement those things, could well be to have some sort of personal "malpractice" liability insurance, that the individual officers would be responsible for paying. It's hardly as if these police officers are underpaid -- if medical practitioners can manage, then at their pay scale, police officers certainly could too. This way, perhaps the police unions (or at least, the police union memberships) might be much readier to see those other, oversight measures as being in their own interest.
And as we have seen here, school officials don't necessarily know how to exercise reasonable judgement, so relying on them to enforce discipline may have been problematic as well -- especially in cases like described here, where the school system has clearly demonstrated a pronounced (and historically problematic) racial bias in its application of "discipline".
He doesn't understand his own comments, either.
Am I really going to have to learn to read the poster/by-line first, before I bother reading the comment?
He aided our fascist adversaries, both foreign and domestic.Well, it that's your issue, what's the problem? After all, that simply puts Assange in good company with the Republican Party, the previous American President, and the biggest television broadcaster in America.
That's really quite awful. Stephen King could probably write a best-seller horror novel based on that.
I seem to have been unusually fortunate, in that the schools I attended while growing up were very much run on the principle that students are young people in an educational institution, learning to become responsible adults and encouraged to act accordingly... rather than prisoners in some sort of penal institution, irredeemably irresponsible and untrustworthy, that need to be subjected to strict authoritarian control.
"Grifting" is an obligatory job skill for a politician -- even the "good" ones. The political process and the voting public both make some level of grifting a practical necessity, for any politician seeking to get elected, or reelected. The difference is how deeply and how willingly they participate in the grift. While some have a care for the concept of integrity and avoid grift as carefully as the political game will permit, others eagerly grasp the grift as a pillar of -- even the foundation of and reason for -- their entire political career. And although grifters can be found in all sectors of political inclination, it's very clear that in contemporary politics, the happy grifters, untroubled by concerns for personal integrity or care for their constituents, quite naturally and unmistakably gravitate towards the so-called "Right" wing of the political spectrum, to the point that "Right" wing is ballasted as much by grift, as by any interest in democracy or constructive public policy.
Pool. Pinball. Rock & Roll. Ouija Boards. Cable Television. Dragons & Dungeons. Satanic Cults. Computer Games. The Internet. Social Media... You know what? I'm sensing a kind of... pattern here. I think the real problem might be all the supposed adults, who apparently are disturbingly vulnerable to Moral Panics of all sorts -- and can't resist the urge to project their own insecurity, immaturity, and inability to think clearly, upon "the children".
That simple fact simply doesn't matter, because the real question isn't "Who's right?" The real question is "How much are you willing to spend fighting this in court?"
Three thousand year old Jewish scholastic and legal tradition recognizes, and describes at least eight genders -- as these differences could actually make a difference in religious observance and legal obligations. That's what happens when one is more concerned with understanding the reality one is faced with, than with trying to decree realities that are inconvenient or that one feels uncomfortable with, simply don't actually exist.
Apparently that doesn't mean what you think it means, either.
Degenerate rant deliberately not quotedYou keep using those words. None of them mean what you think they mean.
Even if 'Meeple' was/is trademarked, is that actually enough to bar use by others, in light of it being a long-established, generic term (in fact, so long and so established, that everybody was surprised to learn that the term was trademarked, let alone belonged to an established brand)? It seems to me that 'meeple' has suffered a fate similar to 'kleenex' -- except there's no dispute over whether Kimberly-Clark invented the term. "Meeple" has become, perhaps always was, and in any case ought to be considered a thoroughly generic term.
Which, to a certain cast of mind, is an excellent example of how "social media" is a huge problem that we have to "keep away from our children" (more honestly, "to keep our children away from").
It depends on the talking heads, and the interviewers, and the production support (researchers, fact-checkers, etc). But yeah -- most "talking head" news programs are just filler, with no meaningful push-back on facts or logic, nor meaningful digging in to the roots of the story.
"This is my weapon, this is my gun. one is for shooting, one is for fun."
No. He loves you too.