This is really good and I eagerly await the other parts.
To individuals or small businesses, the industry behemoths might as well be the government because (1) they are orders of magnitude larger, (2) we can rarely say no, and (3) we have little to no direct influence over them.
From The Guardian: "Six4Three alleges the cache shows Facebook was not only aware of the implications of its privacy policy, but actively exploited them, intentionally creating and effectively flagging up the loophole that Cambridge Analytica used to collect data."
There's your tech dirt, and the reason I posted the link to the insider chat.
"It was reported here last week that, in 2012, Vance ordered his prosecutors to drop a promising criminal-fraud investigation against Ivanka Trump and Donald Trump, Jr., who were suspected of misleading potential buyers of condos in the Trump SoHo building; the order came after their father’s attorney, Marc Kasowitz, paid Vance a visit. Soon after Vance’s office dropped the investigation, Kasowitz donated and raised a combined total of more than fifty thousand dollars for Vance’s reëlection campaign."
Well, I'm assuming that because the investigation is sensitive that means there is an investigation. Of course, not by Trump but it's happening!
I guess when you are a whistle blower you just better know what you are talking about, like Snowden was. Even if you're right it will blow back hard on you, but if you are wrong, well, then you threw your life away for almost nothing.
How can you write an article about Pam Bondi, and even mention the Ethics Commission, and not mention how she called off her investigation into Trump University just as she received $25,000 from Trump? Set the stage with that, so people know the kind of person you are talking about. Bring the context! Then we'll understand better how much credence to lend her ideas.
(You're usually pretty good about the context actually, so good in fact that's what made this article stand out.)
In cases of prosecutorial misconduct, the most fitting penalty is for the prosecutors to receive a sentence equal to the sentence that the defendant would have received.
I actually think that embedding is not identical to linking. With linking, the user has to take an action to see the content, ie, click the link. They can decide not to follow the link. With embedding, they have taken no overt action and are seeing it as a result of the embedding website's action. The whole point of embedding is to make the content blend more seamlessly into the embedder's web page.
Embedding is also not a core technology of the internet and eliminating embedding won't destroy the net. It is just a convenience.
“Tehran’s prosecutor, after referral of the case to the Cyberspace corruption and prostitution department, said that the defendants in the case, of whom six were currently detained, produced vagabond and pornographic films and sold them in cyberspace,” Tehran Prosecutor Abbas Jafari Dowlatabadi said in an announcement.
I have never heard of vagabond movies. How can I get in on some of that action?
I understand why first nations have sovereignty, but it's being used today in ways that more resemble virtual reparations. I would rather just pay reparations one time and then normalize laws between the first nations and the rest of the country.
Nothingburger here. The only news is that the gene sequencing software has exploits, which one expects from such highly specialized, low customer count software.
So they crafted the input from DNA? Cute but dumb. If they streamed the same GCATs into stdin they'd get the same result.
Re: Dear Verizon...
Yeah! As I like to say, "Stay in your lane." But they never do.
(untitled comment)
Here's another one, with a better payload:
https://twitter.com/RudyGiuliani/status/1041168209074941952
(untitled comment)
This is really good and I eagerly await the other parts.
To individuals or small businesses, the industry behemoths might as well be the government because (1) they are orders of magnitude larger, (2) we can rarely say no, and (3) we have little to no direct influence over them.
(untitled comment)
From The Guardian: "Six4Three alleges the cache shows Facebook was not only aware of the implications of its privacy policy, but actively exploited them, intentionally creating and effectively flagging up the loophole that Cambridge Analytica used to collect data."
There's your tech dirt, and the reason I posted the link to the insider chat.
(untitled comment)
"It was reported here last week that, in 2012, Vance ordered his prosecutors to drop a promising criminal-fraud investigation against Ivanka Trump and Donald Trump, Jr., who were suspected of misleading potential buyers of condos in the Trump SoHo building; the order came after their father’s attorney, Marc Kasowitz, paid Vance a visit. Soon after Vance’s office dropped the investigation, Kasowitz donated and raised a combined total of more than fifty thousand dollars for Vance’s reëlection campaign."
https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/why-didnt-manhattan-da-cyrus-vance-prosecute-the- trumps-or-harvey-weinstein
(untitled comment)
"pathological liar and his oligarch cronies" applies to Trump and Greenwald.
Re: Re: Denials everywhere...
Came here to say this.
Re: Re:
Well, I'm assuming that because the investigation is sensitive that means there is an investigation. Of course, not by Trump but it's happening!
I guess when you are a whistle blower you just better know what you are talking about, like Snowden was. Even if you're right it will blow back hard on you, but if you are wrong, well, then you threw your life away for almost nothing.
(untitled comment)
How can you write an article about Pam Bondi, and even mention the Ethics Commission, and not mention how she called off her investigation into Trump University just as she received $25,000 from Trump? Set the stage with that, so people know the kind of person you are talking about. Bring the context! Then we'll understand better how much credence to lend her ideas.
(You're usually pretty good about the context actually, so good in fact that's what made this article stand out.)
Re:
There is an xkcd for everything.
(untitled comment)
In cases of prosecutorial misconduct, the most fitting penalty is for the prosecutors to receive a sentence equal to the sentence that the defendant would have received.
(untitled comment)
Yesterday: We must give this K9 officer a full police burial for being killed in the line of duty.
https://www.today.com/pets/police-dog-buried-full-honors-after-dying-line-duty-1D80117522
https: //www.youtube.com/watch?v=E2gDGQ2DaDw
https://www.washingtontimes.com/multimedia/collection/police-do g-funeral/
Tomorrow: We don't need these dogs anymore so we're just gonna kill them.
(untitled comment)
I actually think that embedding is not identical to linking. With linking, the user has to take an action to see the content, ie, click the link. They can decide not to follow the link. With embedding, they have taken no overt action and are seeing it as a result of the embedding website's action. The whole point of embedding is to make the content blend more seamlessly into the embedder's web page.
Embedding is also not a core technology of the internet and eliminating embedding won't destroy the net. It is just a convenience.
(untitled comment)
"Last month, the conspiracy channel filed a DMCA copyright complaint requesting that Google delist Evon’s article from its search results."
What is Evon? It's not mentioned elsewhere in the article.
(untitled comment)
https://thenextweb.com/security/2017/11/09/researchers-find-almost-every-computer-intel-skylake-cpu- can-owned-via-usb/?amp=1
(untitled comment)
We need those ads in the USA. Please export!
(untitled comment)
“Tehran’s prosecutor, after referral of the case to the Cyberspace corruption and prostitution department, said that the defendants in the case, of whom six were currently detained, produced vagabond and pornographic films and sold them in cyberspace,” Tehran Prosecutor Abbas Jafari Dowlatabadi said in an announcement.
I have never heard of vagabond movies. How can I get in on some of that action?
(untitled comment)
I understand why first nations have sovereignty, but it's being used today in ways that more resemble virtual reparations. I would rather just pay reparations one time and then normalize laws between the first nations and the rest of the country.
(untitled comment)
Nothingburger here. The only news is that the gene sequencing software has exploits, which one expects from such highly specialized, low customer count software.
So they crafted the input from DNA? Cute but dumb. If they streamed the same GCATs into stdin they'd get the same result.
(untitled comment)
I never did like Moosehead. The antlers hurt my thighs.