How can you write an article about Pam Bondi, and even mention the Ethics Commission, and not mention how she called off her investigation into Trump University just as she received $25,000 from Trump? Set the stage with that, so people know the kind of person you are talking about. Bring the context! Then we'll understand better how much credence to lend her ideas.
(You're usually pretty good about the context actually, so good in fact that's what made this article stand out.)
In cases of prosecutorial misconduct, the most fitting penalty is for the prosecutors to receive a sentence equal to the sentence that the defendant would have received.
I actually think that embedding is not identical to linking. With linking, the user has to take an action to see the content, ie, click the link. They can decide not to follow the link. With embedding, they have taken no overt action and are seeing it as a result of the embedding website's action. The whole point of embedding is to make the content blend more seamlessly into the embedder's web page.
Embedding is also not a core technology of the internet and eliminating embedding won't destroy the net. It is just a convenience.
“Tehran’s prosecutor, after referral of the case to the Cyberspace corruption and prostitution department, said that the defendants in the case, of whom six were currently detained, produced vagabond and pornographic films and sold them in cyberspace,” Tehran Prosecutor Abbas Jafari Dowlatabadi said in an announcement.
I have never heard of vagabond movies. How can I get in on some of that action?
I understand why first nations have sovereignty, but it's being used today in ways that more resemble virtual reparations. I would rather just pay reparations one time and then normalize laws between the first nations and the rest of the country.
Nothingburger here. The only news is that the gene sequencing software has exploits, which one expects from such highly specialized, low customer count software.
So they crafted the input from DNA? Cute but dumb. If they streamed the same GCATs into stdin they'd get the same result.
I'm sure the folks at the company would understand if tiffany.com were seized by the government over such allegations, should they prove to be true. Right?
(untitled comment)
How can you write an article about Pam Bondi, and even mention the Ethics Commission, and not mention how she called off her investigation into Trump University just as she received $25,000 from Trump? Set the stage with that, so people know the kind of person you are talking about. Bring the context! Then we'll understand better how much credence to lend her ideas.
(You're usually pretty good about the context actually, so good in fact that's what made this article stand out.)
Re:
There is an xkcd for everything.
(untitled comment)
In cases of prosecutorial misconduct, the most fitting penalty is for the prosecutors to receive a sentence equal to the sentence that the defendant would have received.
(untitled comment)
Yesterday: We must give this K9 officer a full police burial for being killed in the line of duty.
https://www.today.com/pets/police-dog-buried-full-honors-after-dying-line-duty-1D80117522
https: //www.youtube.com/watch?v=E2gDGQ2DaDw
https://www.washingtontimes.com/multimedia/collection/police-do g-funeral/
Tomorrow: We don't need these dogs anymore so we're just gonna kill them.
(untitled comment)
I actually think that embedding is not identical to linking. With linking, the user has to take an action to see the content, ie, click the link. They can decide not to follow the link. With embedding, they have taken no overt action and are seeing it as a result of the embedding website's action. The whole point of embedding is to make the content blend more seamlessly into the embedder's web page.
Embedding is also not a core technology of the internet and eliminating embedding won't destroy the net. It is just a convenience.
(untitled comment)
"Last month, the conspiracy channel filed a DMCA copyright complaint requesting that Google delist Evon’s article from its search results."
What is Evon? It's not mentioned elsewhere in the article.
(untitled comment)
https://thenextweb.com/security/2017/11/09/researchers-find-almost-every-computer-intel-skylake-cpu- can-owned-via-usb/?amp=1
(untitled comment)
We need those ads in the USA. Please export!
(untitled comment)
“Tehran’s prosecutor, after referral of the case to the Cyberspace corruption and prostitution department, said that the defendants in the case, of whom six were currently detained, produced vagabond and pornographic films and sold them in cyberspace,” Tehran Prosecutor Abbas Jafari Dowlatabadi said in an announcement.
I have never heard of vagabond movies. How can I get in on some of that action?
(untitled comment)
I understand why first nations have sovereignty, but it's being used today in ways that more resemble virtual reparations. I would rather just pay reparations one time and then normalize laws between the first nations and the rest of the country.
(untitled comment)
Nothingburger here. The only news is that the gene sequencing software has exploits, which one expects from such highly specialized, low customer count software.
So they crafted the input from DNA? Cute but dumb. If they streamed the same GCATs into stdin they'd get the same result.
(untitled comment)
I never did like Moosehead. The antlers hurt my thighs.
(untitled comment)
Do you mean like when Bush and Cheney leaked Valerie Plame's name? Yes, that would be abhorrent.
(untitled comment)
I'm sure the folks at the company would understand if tiffany.com were seized by the government over such allegations, should they prove to be true. Right?
Since when does forfeiture require proof?
Re:
Do not feed Putin's trolls.
Re:
Hey Mason, I have some funds to send you via Paypal. What's your email address?
(untitled comment)
Another home run by Karl Bode. Keep writing man!
(untitled comment)
Prosecutor: "Please show us on this doll where Mr. Snowden illegally touched your data."
(untitled comment)
Charge $1 to comment.
(untitled comment)
mulled over the evidence
I see what you did there.