If someone wants to prove that they voted, great they have their stubs. Take a picture of that. If someone can prove how they voted, then some will be forced to do so, by abusive spouses or employers. Failure to vote the right way, or even to take your selfie, will grounds for a beating or dismissal.
New Hampshire isn't the only state to have that law. I believe it's the law in every state. TechDirt needs to do some more reading on elections before it spreads disinformation like this.
I would love to read an article where someone mocked up a copy of the judge's license plate over their's and ran the red light hundreds of times (safely, at night, with no one around).
Agreed. This has to be part of a coordinated action with the government for mass surveillance. You agree to this now, then in the future any government spy's wet dreams are installed on your computer without your knowledge or consent.
Re:
If someone wants to prove that they voted, great they have their stubs. Take a picture of that. If someone can prove how they voted, then some will be forced to do so, by abusive spouses or employers. Failure to vote the right way, or even to take your selfie, will grounds for a beating or dismissal.
New Hampshire isn't the only state to have that law. I believe it's the law in every state. TechDirt needs to do some more reading on elections before it spreads disinformation like this.
[Dsiclosure: I was the AC I'm replying to.]
Re:
Shit happens, then it rolls downhill.
(untitled comment)
Of course all the Skittles will kill you from the sugar.
Re: ITT...
Shut up Peter.
Re:
That's the comment I was waiting to see.
(untitled comment)
I™©® would™©® have™©® more™©® sympathy™©® for™©® rights™©® holders™©® if™©® they™©® weren't™©® actively™©® stealing™©® from™©® America™©® by™©® persistently™©® attacking™©® fair™©® use™©®, public™©® domain™©®, and™©® prior™©® art™©®.
(untitled comment)
All they need to do is make reverse engineering something illegal.
Re: Re:
I think he meant: overbilling, buying politicians, complicity in scams, etc.
Re: Re: Tell me again?
Thanks for explaining that. I was also surprised. But:
Don't all the DNS providers sync up over time?
Why would anyone care how you get your DNS?
(untitled comment)
Nice to see knowledge of the corruption reaching mainstream.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Solution: Air Gapped, Tamper Resistant and Audited
I suspect he meant he can verify THAT it was counted. Verifying HOW it was counted would never have been implemented.
(untitled comment)
Ubiquitous hacking -> no expectation of computer security
Ubiquitous surveillance -> no expectation of privacy
What's next?
Re: Re: Not exactly.
"put in on itunes and cut out the middle men"
Say, what?
Re: Re: Re:
Won't someone think of the electeds?
Re:
Drone with spray paint attachment
(untitled comment)
Never let a vendor debit your accounts.
Re:
Ahem. I'm still waiting to see if M$ will deal with the lack of control of updates on W10.
They will not change that because it's the entire reason for Windows 10.
(untitled comment)
I would love to read an article where someone mocked up a copy of the judge's license plate over their's and ran the red light hundreds of times (safely, at night, with no one around).
Re: Re: MS fanboys
Are games so important you'll let yourself be pwned in real life?
Re: Re: The lesson for Microsoft
Agreed. This has to be part of a coordinated action with the government for mass surveillance. You agree to this now, then in the future any government spy's wet dreams are installed on your computer without your knowledge or consent.