Yes, this is how we should be using AI... as a tool to achieve more. It doesn't replace us, it assists us. The policy at my place of work is that AI tool usage is acceptable (though not mandatory), but the employee still takes 100% responsibility for the output in their name. So if you let AI fck up... you fcked up, and YOU will find out. Like you, MathFox, I've used AI to save typing time, and make suggestions on how to solve problems, including diagnosing some of the more esoteric (to put it politely) error messages from XML/XSLT processors (for example). But all the code from my computer is still committed in my name, and I'm the one that is in my periodic reviews, not AI.
I expect a mix of these strategies will play out: 1) rebrand, 2) found new companies with (most of?) the same partners, 3) try to power through regardless. 1 & 2 are functionally very similar, though 1 carries more risk of "didn't you know, they used to be ?". 3 relies upon the lack of googling skills in their future client base.
Because juries are soooo effective at justice, and supreme courts so immune from internal political influence (Justice Roberts, anyone?) as to be credible checks & balances upon anything. The ICC's mission is to try to find and prosecute the worst of the worst. Right now, Hegseth and Trump fit that bill, just as much as an 'tin pot dictator' putting down public protest and dissent with violence.
You're comparing the wrong things. Starship isn't comparable to Apollo, but to the much more experimental Redstone & Mercury programs that came before it. And Starship hasn't killed anyone yet, unlike Apollo.
By the prosecutorial branch of the govern..... oh!
I think 'deserve' is a little strong. Nobody really deserves Trump (apart from, perhaps, people like Epstein). Perhaps 'inflicted this upon yourselves' is more accurate. It's up to you and your representatives to fix it. NOW!
My recollection is that I discovered Techdirt from Fark. But that's a looong time ago now, and I've not visited Fark in many years.
That would be a nice Christmas present... in 2025. Only problem is that it requires Congress to get off their fat asses and actually find their collective SPINE.
I never saw Sun Microsystems claim everything was Java... only where there was Java actually used. (a former Sun user and closing in on 30 years a Java programmer)
As a SAR volunteer I endorse the above comment!
No, some government wonks in Westminster, London, England will demand to differ. The rest of us are still sane.
I can't figure out whether you're supporting Mike's position sarcastically, or just don't understand a single word he wrote.
No-one seems to have considered that the Internet is international, but ID documents are not. I cannot ever get a US drivers license, and so any simplistic age/ID-gating based upon that document excludes roughly 8 billion citizens of the Internet, not just the approx 300 million (a mere 3.75% of the global population) population of the USA. An ID document based system (if you really want it to work, and I don't) needs to allow Tonga, Ukrainian, German, Brazilian, Chinese, Nigerian, and British formal IDs ... and all the rest, or you're excluding more than just a few LGBTQ+, Black, Native, or non-Caucasian people locally. Why are US internet businesses cutting off over 95% of their possible market by tolerating this shit?
... but WTF has that got to do with the Indian government's actions and backpedalling?
Seems pretty clear that part of the meal for the brain worm included JFK Jr's soul. Or at least, the part that enabled him to distinguish fact from deadly fantasy.
There is now a BBC News article on the subject of the letter which they have now received.
What's next? Email signatures, government websites, OOO messages just in time for the midterms? Or if trumpbaby doesn't manage to invent an emergency in time for the next presidential election... the next presidential election. Nothing is off limits to this bunch of Nazis.
I have a dim recollection of a time and a technology that meant that I owned an actual copy of the media I wanted to... and could put said physical media in a device and display it on a screen with no internet connection. What was that archaic media? Oh yeah, DVD. On demand sports and news-comedy shows? Who cares, there'll be another one along in a week, just the same as the last one.
No, I'm not in the UK either... but both the cited MPs are. If any here are constituents of those MPs, they should be writing to the MPs to suggest it. And, quite frankly, I'm surprised that Sewards (who's on the relevant parliamentary group) hasn't already thought of it and done it.
If it's so obvious...
... perhaps you would like to enlighten the rest of the class?