No-one seems to have considered that the Internet is international, but ID documents are not. I cannot ever get a US drivers license, and so any simplistic age/ID-gating based upon that document excludes roughly 8 billion citizens of the Internet, not just the approx 300 million (a mere 3.75% of the global population) population of the USA. An ID document based system (if you really want it to work, and I don't) needs to allow Tonga, Ukrainian, German, Brazilian, Chinese, Nigerian, and British formal IDs ... and all the rest, or you're excluding more than just a few LGBTQ+, Black, Native, or non-Caucasian people locally. Why are US internet businesses cutting off over 95% of their possible market by tolerating this shit?
... but WTF has that got to do with the Indian government's actions and backpedalling?
Seems pretty clear that part of the meal for the brain worm included JFK Jr's soul. Or at least, the part that enabled him to distinguish fact from deadly fantasy.
There is now a BBC News article on the subject of the letter which they have now received.
What's next? Email signatures, government websites, OOO messages just in time for the midterms? Or if trumpbaby doesn't manage to invent an emergency in time for the next presidential election... the next presidential election. Nothing is off limits to this bunch of Nazis.
I have a dim recollection of a time and a technology that meant that I owned an actual copy of the media I wanted to... and could put said physical media in a device and display it on a screen with no internet connection. What was that archaic media? Oh yeah, DVD. On demand sports and news-comedy shows? Who cares, there'll be another one along in a week, just the same as the last one.
No, I'm not in the UK either... but both the cited MPs are. If any here are constituents of those MPs, they should be writing to the MPs to suggest it. And, quite frankly, I'm surprised that Sewards (who's on the relevant parliamentary group) hasn't already thought of it and done it.
We’ve got a long road to travel and millions in lobbying dollars to breakthrough before any real progress is made.Or we (and the MPs) could suggest that the UK Trading Standards office (part of the government) takes a test case to court over some major title that has fallen foul of the existing legislation. No lobbying needed.
Let me find them a ladder to get out of the hole they've just dug!
No shit, sherlock.
It's funny how people's own knowledge of a language (or at least a West-Atlantic derivative of one) means they're an expert on what 'everyone knows'. I've been speaking English for over 50 years and never heard the 'well known' term 'Pho' before. Which puts it on a par with 'Sabzi' as far as I'm concerned.
Legal Eagle (Devin Stone) might have something to say about that choice of catchphrase!
Why are the GOP and, it seems, the broader right-wing of American politics so clearly OBSESSED with people's genitals?
like cozying up to talented engineers and taking singular credit for their workThere's the reason very few people know the actual engineers and day-to-day managers of SpaceX and Tesla are. Musk is NOT a rocket scientist or electrical or mechanical engineer. He's a meme artist; and a piss-poor one at that.
In this world of milquetoast mainstream media in the US, you criticise TechDirt for saying something that happens to end up under the fold? OMG have you got bigger fish to fry!
Mostly agreeably incoherent.I can't tell whether they're agreeable or not as I cannot read their word salad & capitalisation nightmare-fuel comments.
I wanted to click Funny, until I realized it is 2025 and the orange baboon and his coterie of apes is in charge.
I can't figure out whether you're supporting Mike's position sarcastically, or just don't understand a single word he wrote.