He doesn't need one at Tesla or SpaceX, so why does he need one at Twitter... afterall, he's his own Chief Twit! ("twit" does have the same pejorative meaning in SA and USA English as it does in British English, doesn't it?)
"Or is your argument that, because Musk has spent billions on aerospace, automobiles, and electricity, that somehow obviously means he knows the first thing about content moderation?" No, but he didn't know much about aerospace, automobiles or electricity when he started out, but he did know how to hire people who did. Just a shame he doesn't appear to be bringing this same strategy to social media moderation. Quite the opposite in fact.
The article is not about whether interference exists, it's about the overreaction and scare-story leaks from the FAA before the testing was even done.
One branch of government doesn't understand what another branch does, misconstrues situation, leaks poison. News at 11.
I suggest that you are seriously over-thinking this. Cartels of that nature would need a lot of organising and could not stay secret for long.
Let's all just stop accessing news sites altogether. How hard would it be? Google? Bing? Any other search engine? Just de-list anyone who's demanding payment for linking. It won't be long before they come crawling back for that sweet, sweet ad-supported revenue.
To all those who say that Taqueria is either generic or descriptive, it is not so in British English. It didn't even get added to the Oxford English Dictionary until 2003. It's not even the correct spelling; that would be 'tequeria'. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/taqueria I'd never come across the world in over 50 years of speaking English, until today.
I foresee a new fashion for green paint or green tiles sweeping across France.
Hopefully voters will ensure the sheriff and board members are no longer worthy of their trust, support, or government positions.I'm amazed at the posts that you people consider electable. Sheriffs? Prison boards? These should be professional people with experience and skills in criminal justice and managing prisons. Not just the loudest Billy-Bo Bought-the-Voters in town.
I refer you to the earlier discussion on Grey's Law and Newbury's Law!
The damage is already done. And I'd like to believe that a lot of people will now consider BMW as a tainted brand from now on. (It certainly is with me)
What does this do to the second hand market? Can the primary purchaser of the car actually sell it on to anyone in good faith? (maybe back to a BMW dealership?) And how long will it be before it's sixth gear, or windscreen wipers, or eco-mode that's a subscription service?
I wonder if any territory has established a useful and largely successful (with some bugs to be ironed out) legislative framework that gives the individual rights around their data, and protects, for example, extremely personal information such as sexual orientation. I know it's not fashionable to cite the GDPR around here, but there are some successes therein. It is forcing companies to take the principals seriously, even if you don't like the over-reach of the right-to-be-forgotten.
Make false filings have real consequences for the filer. Whoever they are or represent.
Companies should not be compelled to host what they deem, as an organisation and as defined in their terms of service and published policies, to be unacceptable on their own service. If you compel them to host all speech, you're enabling the misinformation pedlers, spammers and toxic influences in society. Do you really want that? Every internet service that dares to have a comment section will descend in to 4chan/8chan land (or whatever they're called today) and we'll all be far worse off.
Who'da thunk that making your product more widely available might make it more widely bought and played and profitable. And you're less in need of hardware sales ... that you're subsidising in the first place as a loss leader for getting people to buy the games!
In science, we expect extraordinary claims to be backed up by extraordinary evidence. Why do journalists get a free ride?
Then why aren't we talking about tackling the excessive cost of litigating?
Hang on a second. Based on the text above, Belton was sued because her book was inaccurate? And the GDPR case ensured that she fixed those inaccuracies? Who gives a damn who it was inaccurate about. This is clearly a correct finding at law... even if you think GDPR is a four-letter word.
Customer power? Tech media power?
Isn't it time for the consumers (I guess, where they have a choice) and tech media journalists to start getting involved and insist upon the replacement of 'up to' with 'at least'. Oh, and Washington needs to start understanding the damage than the lobbying industry has done to US democracy .. but I suppose that's a turkeys voting for Christmas issue. God damn, but your country is broken!