The great thing about maximalism is its self-defined ability to approach infinite absurdity. Case in point: a sportswriter - a sportswriter - understands copyright maximalism well enough to use it satirically.
This trend will reach infinity when hookers will tell anyone involved in IP "Sorry, there's some things I just won't do" and coke dealers will tell them "Get lost. I got a reputation to protect", at which point Hollywood will slip beyond the event horizon and southern California will be just another nice, semi-arid place to live.
Wait....you're saying that jumper cables have other uses BESIDES getting funky? LOL next you'll be saying that jack thingy has something to do with a car too.
At least she doesn't have an address like 'janetboobear8234@aol.com' or publicly says things like "The Information Superhighway".
....that after 14 years and countless billions of dollars, Google has perfected a machine intelligence that cannot be destroyed by logical contradictions - the LawyerBot.
Indisputably, Congress drafted the Copyright Act to prevent the creative efforts of authors from being usurped by new technologies.Regardless if those new technologies further the exposure of the author to a larger public, which is the point where copyright maximalists and I part company.
While such a drop isn't unusual for a movie during the course of a week -- especially when the theater count dropped from 1,876 to 1,216....So this political documentary filmmaker is claiming a current theater count of 1,216 after ten weeks....according to box office data, that's more theaters than most studio releases. Does his definition of 'theater' include basements and high school gyms?
After reading the latest on Dotcom over on TF, this seemed at first glance to be a "Good doggie, New Zealand, here's a biscuit!" gesture, a partial payment from the US for raiding Mega. Commenters have pointed out this trend in other regions, however, so I say good on ya networks for only taking 10 years to figure it out.
With media execs using their brains for more than dustcatchers, what will all those nasty torrenters do?
Won't somebody think of the pirates?
The only time you move forward by backing up is when something is biting you square in the ass.
-- old Maine proverb
I'm sure after their recent dealings with the DOJ that the Harper Collins lawyers needed a good laugh.
And he's never, to my knowledge, acknowledged or explained his hypocrisy in using that particular, copyrighted image. That just makes him another fucking troll.
And, being a troll, his pleasure comes from pushing peoples' buttons. Trolls have no emotional or intellectual investment in their comments. They post just to get a reaction.
Fuck 'em.
I imagine morose studio executives staring into their scotch-and-waters, seeing their career termination lights winking towards them, thinking about how reasonable the RIAA sounded back then, thinking the two saddest words in the world: If only...
Well done!
It's telling that a number of people (myself included) had to look up just who the hell Ewan Morrison is.
And this quote from the original article:
...the point where fans become the creators, and a derivative work becomes the new original is also the point at which the culture industries stop needing to create anything new.tells exactly what Morrison is: a card-carrying copyright maximalist who wants to lock everything down.
So they have a pornography plank. Dantes's Dungeon has had those in stock for years.
....
Not that I would know anything about it.
That's a Harvard comma to you, my good man.
Maybe I should sign up for a dozen different video services...This is one of the greatest difficulties the studios and other content creators are having with the direct-to-consumer distribution model: market fragmentation. The 'piratical' distribution is source-neutral; like the video stores of old, where the content comes from is less important than the quantity of the content. And yes, the pirates are all evil freetards who will burn in hell forever, but what they offer on this mortal coil is convenience.
Insurance companies have one goal, and that is to make a profit. The easiest way to do that is to deny claims.The second easiest way is to add (and charge for) hilariously implausible scenarios. For instance, I can't drive through "radioactive areas" or transport "explosive or potentially explosive materials". This totally ruined my plan to fund my vacation to visit Chernobyl by selling hairspray. Damn you AllState!
A thought occurs to me reading this thread. Making a quality rip is a very demanding technical process which requires a good deal of knowledge; you really can't just run something through a ripper and expect it to be good. What's to stop a studio from DLing an excellent rip of one of their own properties and marketing it as a value-added product? I'd pay good money for a good rip w/o any "features"; I'd pay even more for a good rip from a studio with, say, "ScOrp" overlaid in the lower right hand corner. Now that's quality!
The funny thing about music is that people can tie a certain song to a specific event in their life...This is so true. The first memory I have with "Back In Black" was handing a wad of cash over the counter to a man wearing a red vest.
"rented": lol well played sir! I don't think you can do ANYTHING in Silicon Valley without being involved in some way with Google. I don't agree with your previous comment but I must give you +1 for your wit here.
Leapfrogging Infrastructure
IIRC, the US is burdened with a legacy telco infrastrucure, with the majority of homes wired for Plain Old Telephone Service (POTS) - twisted pairs of copper wire. There's a physical limitation to how much data can be stuffed down these skinny pipes. Cable provides a fatter pipe, but the problem is cablecos are content providers, so there is little incentive for them to provide access to competing content from that Internet thingy.
The infrastructure in the US is perfectly set up for what is was designed for - low-bandwidth speech via copper, one-way video via cable. In essence, internet access is being piggy-backed on systems not designed for it. And, again, there is little incentive for these companies to upgrade their hardware so their content competitors can use their pipes.
In contrast, developing nations can bypass this old technology and go directly to fiber and/or tower transmission, with the toothless legacy players unable to block the buildout.