I'm not looking forward to what happens between the USS Gerald R. Ford battle group and Venezuela. My focus will be how the ranking officers in the group handle the illegal order(s) to preform any armed operations against a sovereign nation. It is illegal as the officers' oath does NOT reference the president in any way, shape, or form.
The oath:
“I, name here, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me, God.”
If any of the battle group fires even a single round of anything, they become a domestic enemy in my book.
Don't get me started on domestic enemies in the US.
As opposed to ensigns, officers do not swear to follow the commands of the president.
Incorrect Ensigns are officers.Link "Is an Ensign a Commissioned Officer in the Military?"
Correct Officers do not swear to follow the commands of the president.
The first paragraph addresses this, the rest is historical background for those that desire to read more about it.
Link "The Military Oath That Protects Democracy From Presidents – And Why Hegseth’s “Warrior Ethos” Speech Tests Its Limits"
The JAG's who interpreted the lawful vs unlawful orders per the USMC were fired back in February.Link "Hegseth: Fired military lawyers were potential ‘roadblocks’ to Trump orders"
I am patiently waiting for the day someone with lots of money and an attitude does this...
“takedown requests are sworn statements made under penalty of Boldperjury for false claimsBold.”
geoblock Florida in protest. The page that Floridians get directed to should explain to them why, and that they should contact their state government for an explanation.
Any corporation that is caught charging bogus fees need to be fined 2x the amount that they gather with those fees. No argument accepted. Laws need to be made that address this kind of activity (like that'll ever happen).
Good example of a fine would be doled out using the Frontier example in this article.
"Note that Frontier has 3,735,000 broadband subscribers, each paying $4 a month in completely erroneous surcharges. That's nearly $15 million in bullshit charges in just one month, or $180 million in dodgy revenue every year."
$30 million per month x the number of months they have been doing this plus an additional $5 million per month cumulative for every month they continue the practice. This will be payable in CASH and NOT stock or the equivalent.
Is she trying to channel ms. g. maxwell? Lower case intentional, that ilk doesn't deserve to have names in caps.
LOL, good luck with that.
I have an idea. Let's follow this story and when signed into law all of us who use VPN for whatever purpose let's browse the WI.gov sites!
I'm not looking forward to what happens between the USS Gerald R. Ford battle group and Venezuela. My focus will be how the ranking officers in the group handle the illegal order(s) to preform any armed operations against a sovereign nation. It is illegal as the officers' oath does NOT reference the president in any way, shape, or form. The oath: “I, name here, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me, God.” If any of the battle group fires even a single round of anything, they become a domestic enemy in my book. Don't get me started on domestic enemies in the US.
The US is not a member of the ICC.
Staying true to the Constitution. U.S. criticism and support of the ICC
As opposed to ensigns, officers do not swear to follow the commands of the president. Incorrect Ensigns are officers. Link "Is an Ensign a Commissioned Officer in the Military?" Correct Officers do not swear to follow the commands of the president. The first paragraph addresses this, the rest is historical background for those that desire to read more about it. Link "The Military Oath That Protects Democracy From Presidents – And Why Hegseth’s “Warrior Ethos” Speech Tests Its Limits" The JAG's who interpreted the lawful vs unlawful orders per the USMC were fired back in February. Link "Hegseth: Fired military lawyers were potential ‘roadblocks’ to Trump orders"
The big question I have...
How many of those in attendance are going to follow the Constitution part of their oath vs the commander in chief part?
China or Russia would be happy to remove them if US astronomers requested them to. /s
I was on the fence about installing Windows 11, this destroyed that fence. They can pry Windows 10 from my pc when it dies.
Read! Read!
While I'm all onboard for this to happen, I need to add one word, lobbyists.
Lifetime License
It's in the specs here. Microsoft Office 2021 Professional https://deals.techdirt.com/sales/the-microsoft-training-bundle-2-zero-to-advanced
RE: Claimed...
I am patiently waiting for the day someone with lots of money and an attitude does this... “takedown requests are sworn statements made under penalty of Boldperjury for false claimsBold.”
Just saw this bovine of an article.
Judge Orders Employees at Devin Nunes Family’s Dairy Farm to Produce Citizenship Documents Following Attorney’s ‘Puzzling and Troubling’ Explanation About Deposition ‘Behavior’
Looks like the dung has finally hit the stall.
Facebook and Twitter should...
geoblock Florida in protest. The page that Floridians get directed to should explain to them why, and that they should contact their state government for an explanation.
Re:
Yes, the police department has to pay. Not with their budget but paying with the funds in the police retirement account.
Fines imposed
Any corporation that is caught charging bogus fees need to be fined 2x the amount that they gather with those fees. No argument accepted. Laws need to be made that address this kind of activity (like that'll ever happen).
Good example of a fine would be doled out using the Frontier example in this article.
"Note that Frontier has 3,735,000 broadband subscribers, each paying $4 a month in completely erroneous surcharges. That's nearly $15 million in bullshit charges in just one month, or $180 million in dodgy revenue every year."
$30 million per month x the number of months they have been doing this plus an additional $5 million per month cumulative for every month they continue the practice. This will be payable in CASH and NOT stock or the equivalent.
No ifs, ands, or buts about it.
TL;DR
In a bad mood so I'll just leave this here.
$5 million is no where near enough.
Re:
I didn't have mine until I was 60.
Re: Kool-Aid
What flavor have you been injecting?
Re: Re:
Republicans, Democrats or US Citizens definition of wrong?