I was attempting to point out, in a ludicrous way, how silly the idea is, that someone in a position to decide what might be "Terrorist Content" could reasonably argue that the President of a internationally recognized sovereign nation's speech should be blocked, and if anyone repeats that speech, it need to be blocked everywhere.
Do you think it could be possible that someone that works at Twitter might dislike Trump's speech so much that the "filters" might block his communication, even "inadvertently"?
If this is not about taxes and fees, it about "Because SCARY!"
CFAA was a response to Wargames.
DHS and a bit of incoherent word salad inflatable-tubeman-arm-waving seems likely to be in response to...
Now that the IoT is a reality, with computerized self driving big-rigs and cars on the way too, WE NEED TO DO SOMETHING to prevent the wholesale slaughter of humans in preparation of the alien colonization of earth!
It is all very reasonable and sensible if you ask me.
“In my experience, there is no way to compromise these election systems,” said Ronald McDonald, head of Westmoreland County's computer burger department. "I Have been given every assurance from The Hamburgler that there is no way!"