"YouTube is worried about a Republican government in 2025" Aren't we all :( Retribution towards media companies will the least of the shit a re-elected President Trump would pull - and he wouldn't be as bad as Prez Desantis.
So I'm just dropping over to see how much of the comments section is again taken over by a couple of trolls and misguided genuine users wasting their digital breath arguing with them. And...guys. Seriously?
"Zuck fucking folded in BOTH instances" Did he shut down the harmful reporting which supported the massacre of Rohingya people? I don't think he did: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2021/dec/06/rohingya-sue-facebook-myanmar-genocide-us-uk-legal-action-social-media-violence
How so? Zuckerberg wouldn't limit new reporting that was supporting a genocide, but will limit it if it costs him money. All Tengrain's post is saying is that it shows exactly what kind of sociopath he is (which isn't news, of course.)
Faceberg has fought compensating news publishers before and infamously refused to go dark when an international consensus concluded that Facebook played a “determining role” in the ongoing ethnic cleansing of the Rohingya in Myanmar. But when Australia floated a law (similar to the one proposed in California), it was lights out the next day. That’s a helluva moral compass, ya got there.
Bell’s is perfectly decent for a blend, actually. You’d be surprised how good the whisky is that goes into popular blended scotch.
You really, really don't understand the smallest thing about anything to do with the issues arising here, do you?
Anyone capable of confusing Tennessee whisky with actual Scottish whiskey, let alone those two bottles, deserves to be sold any old crap.
I suspect Trump already uses one for his Dishonest.Social posts. If he doesn't, he should. He'd sound more coherent if he did.
"it fooled another lawyer of the same firm, a team of lawyers of another firm and a judge" != "AI did such a good job" The lawyer was lazy and lacking in any kind of diligence, the other team were not fooled, and the judge is supposed to assume lawyers aren't bloody lying to him. The AI did an entertaining job. That's all.
"practically"? You misspelled "actually".
Yes, they should, but what should really happen is the law to be changed to make sharing such information absolutely illegal. Blaming the victims is never helpful. Women aren't doing the wrong thing here.
the printed word is harder to control And ebooks are much easier to pirate!
Musk’s destruction of Twitter will be a cautionary tale in business school textbooks I suspect it won't because it's so obviously deliberate - and destroying profitable businesses is already an established practice among vulture capitalists. When President Ivanka is inaugurated by Saudi fiat, Musk will be rolling around on his lake of oil bucks, laughing at his own pathetic jokes, while a retinue of foot lickers feed him peeled grapes and stage executions of selected journalists and critic at suppertime for his entertainment. That is the reward he's going to earn for destroying Twitter.
Are you defending them or indicting them? They're describing them. Also the usual terms of grants for PhD students and similar won't even cover things like bench fees. There's no fucking way they are going to allow $42,000 a month to be shovelled into Musk's open maw.
I hope this Luna guy doesn't end up being dealt with the way Frank Serpico was. Dirty cops really, really don't like being exposed, and when there's a lot of them scuttling around, all it takes is a couple of proactive crooks to take care of the problem in a very permanent way.
"Calling them all of the same cloth" If it's doesn't apply to a particular cop, then that's great. But as a group, in America (and increasingly in other Western democracies), all cops are bastards until proved otherwise. I don't care about how many fucking kittens they save.
"Elsewise I wouldn’t have any further draw to this site." Oh no! Are you disappointed, or very disappointed with us? Please continue to tell the owners of this site how much you would withdraw your patronage if they keep writing stuff you don't like. It's a tactic that works so well.
Shades of this nonsense:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ADE_651