In other words, acting just as they normally do. To state the obvious, these two thugs should pay the $50,000 out of their own pockets. AND be fired.
I know I'm going to get a hatchet job every time I see "copyrights and patents" bunched together, along with the claim that both illegitimately control "ideas". While patents do attempt to protect ideas, copyright protects only specific implementations of ideas. I consider patents to be illegitimate for that reason, but support copyright. If I write a clever spreadsheet program, copyright prevents you from making money selling my program, but does not prevent you from writing and selling your own program, containing all the features mine has. How can any reasonable person be against this?
... and just tell every company to turn over personal information of every buyer everywhere? No, that would be heating up the pot too fast. Give 'em a year or so and see if we're not there.
... to watch the Australian government play Whack-a-Mole as the video gets passed around to more sites. Get a clue, guys, you can't win this one.
Silly citizens! Don't you know that your betters, in "public service", don't need to share anything with you unless they want to? Some asshole cop mistreated you, you say? Just be glad you're still alive, if you were so stupid as to piss that cop off. You know he can kill you with impunity, don't you? Bend over and take it!
I have that effect on some people.
Mr. Masnick is an example of that curious modern species, a human who most of the time seems perfectly rational, but who, at the mention of vaccines and any possible uncertainty regarding them becomes a raving lunatic. For anyone who wants a balanced view, here's a good start: https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2019/07/29/a-second-look-at-vaccination-answers-that-cannot-be-questioned/
The author outs himself as an rabid anti-anti-vaxer, apparently labeling any questioning of the efficacy or potential risks associated with a vaccination as automatically "nonsense". It must be swell to be so all-knowing! As for freedom of speech, well, it's fine, as long as the author and his friends deem its content "not dangerous".
The best answer to mass shooters with guns is more good guys with guns.
This is an illustration of why it's not necessary to run screaming and whining to legislators to pass a LAW prohibiting this or that and mandating that and this. The marketplace takes care of it.
Poor pathetic little cops! They're "Special", and they need special protection from things you or I would have to endure and get over.
The drug war is a crime and anyone who participates in pursuing it is a criminal who should be stopped from further predations by whatever means prove necessary.
Whenever the government spends money on one individual and denies it to another, the reasons should be public knowledge.
... I was running an international business, so I could give Trump the finger in a more tangible way.
And all too many cowardly Americans are intimidated by them.
Good news, if it sticks. But it'll take a lot more to stop the government's march to run our lives down to the smallest detail.
"Where's that nano-violin when you need it?" I've got mine right here ... somewhere.
Typical government thug trick
They do this all the time.
The government is a criminal organization.