Nevertheless, the hypocrisy and intolerance of the LGBTQHA2Z+++ crowd is unrelenting.There's nothing hypocritical or intolerant about not wanting to be discriminated against.
If copyright maximalists had their way, all media older than 30 years would be magically erased from existence, never to be seen again. I've actually seen people defend perpetual copyright by arguing that it would be "unfair" if new releases had to compete with earlier works. According to them, it's a Good Thing™ for old media to be destroyed, because that forces consumers to buy new media in its place.
But the people who rant about copyright must be killed and author’s compensation discarded didn’t even bother to create one copyrighted work over their career.Completely false. I've created multiple copyrighted works, and I still think copyright terms should be reduced. I know I'm not the only creator who feels this way, either. Also, no one here is arguing that "copyright must be killed". Saying that copyrights shouldn't last forever isn't the same thing as saying they shouldn't exist at all.
I’d love to see a 4:30 press release from Apple dropping Twitter from the appstore.Make it 4:20 just for the irony.
Make no mistake: Corporations would absolutely push to have copyright terms last forever and a day if they thought they could get away with it. That they can’t is the only reason they don’t.I'm reminded of a rather pertinent quote from Mary Bono, a prominent supporter of the Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act of 1998:
Actually, Sonny wanted the term of copyright protection to last forever. I am informed by staff that such a change would violate the Constitution. I invite all of you to work with me to strengthen our copyright laws in all of the ways available to us. As you know, there is also Jack Valenti's proposal for term to last forever less one day. Perhaps the Committee may look at that next Congress.Corporations won't be satisfied until they own our culture in its entirety.