ASCAP Continues Its Attack On Lessig; Free Culture

from the but-why? dept

We were already quite surprised when ASCAP set up a private lunch to come up with ways to “counter” the viewpoints of folks like Larry Lessig and various “free culture” supporters. After all, songwriters who have been embracing those concepts are making more money because of it. The problem, of course, is that those means often don’t send that money through ASCAP. Still, as an organization that claims it represents the interests of songwriters, you would think they’d be thrilled to have songwriters make more money. Instead, it appears they would like to have songwriters make less money, and to attack Larry Lessig in the process.

Their latest move was to send out an email to members with links to various articles and commentaries that try to undermine Lessig’s ideas. It’s basically ASCAP propaganda. I guess they’re afraid that songwriters might discover that they don’t actually have to be beholden to ASCAP to make money.

Filed Under: copyright, culture, larry lessig, remix
Companies: ascap

Is Someone Playing A Joke? Why Would Penguin Force Colbert To Take Down Lessig's Remix?

from the something's-not-right dept

Last night, Larry Lessig went on The Colbert Report to talk up his latest book Remix. While I think Remix is an important book and Lessig is a brilliant commentator on these issues, I was a little disappointed by the performance, but I’m willing to chalk it up to the fact that appearing opposite Colbert is incredibly difficult (almost impossible), and Colbert is the best at throwing interviewees off their game.

Of course, pretty much everything Colbert does is satire, and included in the video was the joking suggestion that no one take the video and remix it. Colbert, of course, has been one of the champions of getting folks to remix videos for him. So, obviously, the idea was to get more folks to remix.

However, just a little while ago, some folks started noticing a message at the top of Colbertnation.com saying:

Lawrence Lessig’s REMIX has been removed at the request of Penguin Publishers.

At this point, it’s unclear what exactly has been removed. The video of the interview is still online, so that’s not what’s been removed. Some are wondering if Colbert originally posted a downloadable copy of the book itself that has been removed. Many folks have noticed that Remix is not available for download, despite promises that it would be. Apparently, the free version of the book has been delayed until May, which is pretty lame, itself. And, then, of course, there’s the possibility that the “removal” notice itself is just a Colbert joke — though, it almost seems too subtle for Colbert’s style of humor. If anyone has more info on what happened here, it would be great to know. Update: Adam Green, who works with Lessig and was at the taping stopped by to say, indeed, that it was a joke. If so, it’s a bit odd, since they never even bothered to make clear what it was that was taken down.

Filed Under: copyright, larry lessig, remix, stephen colbert
Companies: penguin publishing

A Remix Weekend: Book And Movie About Remix Culture Released

from the have-fun dept

We just covered Larry Lessig’s recent opinion piece about how to save remix culture (which, tragically, was entitled “a defense of piracy” — which it’s not). However, that was just a teaser from his new book, REMIX, which has now been released. And, of course, true to form, Lessig will soon release a copy of the book online for remixing purposes. And, as Mathew Ingram tells us, today an “open source documentary about copyright and culture” called RiP: A Remix Manifesto is premiering as well. That movie was made, in part, with the help of many people working on making it better. Here’s the trailer:

The movie apparently focuses on Gregg Gillis, better known as Girl Talk, the remix artist we’ve discussed in the past plenty of times. It certainly looks like the book and the documentary will go together well (Lessig appears in the film), and hopefully will get people realizing that creativity has always involved standing on the shoulders of giants, and being able to improve on the works of those who came before you — and with draconian copyright laws, we’re often stamping out that possibility.

Filed Under: larry lessig, remix

Larry Lessig On How To Save Remix Culture

from the good-luck-with-that dept

Larry Lessig has a fantastic op-ed essay in the Wall Street Journal that tries to defend “remix culture” from draconian copyright laws that have made it illegal to build new creative works on the works of others. Not surprisingly, he makes some important points:

This war must end. It is time we recognize that we can’t kill this creativity. We can only criminalize it. We can’t stop our kids from using these tools to create, or make them passive. We can only drive it underground, or make them “pirates.” And the question we as a society must focus on is whether this is any good. Our kids live in an age of prohibition, where more and more of what seems to them to be ordinary behavior is against the law. They recognize it as against the law. They see themselves as “criminals.” They begin to get used to the idea.

That recognition is corrosive. It is corrupting of the very idea of the rule of law. And when we reckon the cost of this corruption, any losses of the content industry pale in comparison.

Copyright law must be changed.

It’s definitely worth reading, and then considering the five suggestions he puts forth for how copyright can be fixed, though I disagree with him on whether or not his suggestions would actually work. I think they would significantly improve things from the way they are today, but Lessig still seems to think that there’s a way to “thread the needle” by distinguishing between commercial works and non-commercial works. The more I look, the less possible I think it is to distinguish between the two in any meaningful way.

Furthermore, Lessig’s solutions are focused very much on trying to “balance” the rights of amateur creative types with professional creative types. However, I think if you look at the economics and historical record, there’s no need to create “balance.” If content creators started adapting new business models, both can succeed tremendously, without having to worry about any kind of balance. A true solution suits both sides perfectly, benefiting both, without either side having to “balance” with the other.

Filed Under: copyright, culture, larry lessig, remix

Radiohead: Pay Us For A Chance To Make Our Songs Better

from the not-that-appealing dept

It’s been clear for quite some time that Radiohead more or less stumbled into its position as “embracing” new music distribution models. The band has admitted that the idea of doing a name your own price download offering was suggested by the band’s manager just before they put the album online. They didn’t really think it through, they just did it. And, since then, it’s been clear that the band doesn’t quite grasp the wider economics of what it’s doing. It never made sense for the band to get rid of the download offering, but it did. And now, the band is getting some publicity for asking its fans to remix a new single from the band, apparently a song the band has struggled to complete for quite a while. However, the details are anything but fan friendly. Fans are asked to buy the five separate tracks (bass, voice, guitar, strings/effects and drums) and only once all five have been bought are they given access to a program to mix the tracks. And, as a bunch of readers have sent in, the terms are not particularly friendly — basically saying that the fans have no rights whatsoever, Radiohead gets everything and no one should expect any prizes for participating. In other words, this is Radiohead getting fans to pay the band to do its work.

Filed Under: contest, radiohead, remix