Copyright Troll Richard Liebowitz Suspended From Practicing Law In New York

from the sorry-richard dept

We have a loooooooooong list of stories about copyright troll Richard Liebowitz and his never-ending antics in court. As we noted earlier this summer, he's been getting suspended from practicing law in courts all around the country (while also piling up more and more sanctions). And while he'd already been suspended in various NY federal courts, he's now been entirely suspended from practicing law in the state of New York. The NY state courts were following up on the federal court in the Southern District of New York suspending Liebowitz, and sought to impose a reciprocal suspension.

The ruling from earlier this week lays out the details of just a very small fraction of Liebowitz's long history of lying to courts and other misbehavior. It then responds to Liebowitz's attempt to wriggle out of this suspension by arguing that he was simply advocating for his clients as best he could, and also that his initial suspension was temporary and "he has not had a full and fair opportunity to litigate the matter in that forum."

The judges reviewing his case are... unimpressed:

We find no merit in the respondent's due process contentions. As opposed to the "cursory nature" of the sanctions hearing in Matter of Dunn (24 NY3d at 704), here the respondent was provided a full and fair opportunity to litigate the disciplinary matter before the Southern District imposed an interim suspension. The record confirms that, prior to imposing interim discipline on him, the Southern District gave the respondent notice of the proceeding, by order to show cause. He was given the Statement of Charges and an opportunity to respond. He availed himself of that opportunity, and submitted a 27-page declaration. With the annexed exhibits, his submission was almost 900 pages long. He will have the chance to defend the charges against him at a full evidentiary hearing in the Southern District before that court imposes final discipline. The respondent has cited no authority for the proposition that the procedure followed in that forum prior to imposing interim discipline did not comport with due process.

Similarly unpersuasive is the respondent's argument that the Southern District's interim determination cannot form the basis for this Court to impose reciprocal discipline at this time. The applicable rule, 22 NYCRR 1240.13, does not require that a foreign order of discipline be final in order for this Court to impose reciprocal discipline. The rule requires proof that the attorney has been "disciplined" by a foreign jurisdiction (id. § 1240.13[a]), and provides that after the attorney has had a chance to be heard, upon review of that jurisdiction's "order" and the record of proceedings there, if relevant, this Court may discipline the attorney for the misconduct committed in the foreign jurisdiction (id. § 1240.13[c]). Notably absent from the text of the rule is any requirement that the foreign jurisdiction's discipline, or the order reflecting it, be final.

Where, as here, the foreign jurisdiction has afforded an attorney an opportunity to be heard and determines that, in light of the nature and seriousness of the charges, the strength of the record supporting those charges, and the risk and danger of recurrence, an interim suspension is necessary to protect the public interest, this Court may, upon review of the order and record of the proceedings, reciprocally impose an interim suspension (see Matter of Perskie, 158 AD3d 19; Matter of Hummel, 99 AD3d 133; Matter of Gray, 110 AD2d 672, affd 67 NY2d 440).

As for the idea that he was doing his best to represent his clients' interests... yeah, that wasn't going to fly either:

The respondent's misconduct in litigation has at times endangered his clients' prospects of recovery, and put his adversaries to needless expense. He has shown disrespect for the courts, as is demonstrated by his admitted conduct before Judge Seibel in the Berger case. His actions in that case included multiple misrepresentations, defiance of her orders, and explicit questioning of her authority as she attempted to probe the truth of his asserted reason for failure to appear at a conference.

The court also doesn't buy Liebowitz's more recent attempts at contrition (I'll note that he's tried to do this many times before when yelled at by courts):

In addition, despite his recent attempts at introspection and contrition, the respondent nonetheless minimizes frequent behavior that made a mockery of orderly litigation processes by attributing it to "sloppiness" and "administrative failures." The existing record from the Southern District supports its conclusion that, given respondent's history of repeated disregard for court orders, recurrence of his misconduct is likely. We find that the respondent has engaged in conduct immediately threatening the public interest and his immediate suspension from the practice of law is warranted.

Of course, we've heard that other lawyers have picked up Liebowitz's practice where he left off, so the copyright trolling continues...

Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: copyright, copyright troll, new york, richard liebowitz


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • icon
    Stephen T. Stone (profile), 5 Nov 2021 @ 1:19pm

    Ain’t that a shame~.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 5 Nov 2021 @ 2:02pm

    All together...1...2...3...aaawww...

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 5 Nov 2021 @ 2:04pm

    Makes me wonder how many people have studied at the Prenda School of Copyright Trolling!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    That One Guy (profile), 5 Nov 2021 @ 2:37pm

    Ah the sweet taste of schadenfreude.

    Oh how terribly unfair, someone who has been abusing the court system for years, facing benchslap after wristslap and being called out over and over(and over) again for gross dishonesty is facing some sort of penalty for that all of a sudden, what a terrible surprise that he couldn't possibly have seen coming and that's obviously been super-duper rushed with no chance to him to respond...

    It won't help his previous victims but it's at least a long-overdue step in the right direction that might prevent there from being as many future victims.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    David, 5 Nov 2021 @ 3:23pm

    Joke's on the New York courts

    As if Liebowitz had been practising law before...

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    That Anonymous Coward (profile), 5 Nov 2021 @ 4:47pm

    something something licks to the center of a tootsie pop except its how many times can he jump on on the bench, piss on everything, then take a dump on the gavel before maybe just maybe we should stop letting him do this.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 5 Nov 2021 @ 4:49pm

    But wait where are the comments supporting Liebowitz against these unfair judges and their personal animosity because Richard has done so much for them in their underdog fight against Big Infringement?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Rocky, 5 Nov 2021 @ 5:28pm

      Re:

      It's Friday, I'll expect Liebowitz's "supporters" to roll in a little later when they have fortified themselves on cheap beer to get their c̵r̵e̵a̵t̵i̵v̵e̵ ̵j̵u̵i̵c̵e̵s̵ idiocy flowing.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 5 Nov 2021 @ 6:13pm

      Re:

      Give Tero Pulkinnen some time, I'm sure he'll get around to it.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Close

Add A Reply

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.