Yet Another Study Shows U.S. 5G Over Promises, Under Delivers

from the unwarranted-hype dept

It was the technology that was supposed to change the world. According to carriers, not only was fifth-generation wireless (5G) supposed to bring about the "fourth industrial revolution," it was supposed to revolutionize everything from smart cities to cancer treatment. According to conspiracy theorists and internet imbeciles, 5G is responsible for everything from Covid-19 to your migraines.

Unfortunately for both sets of folks, data continues to indicate that 5G is nowhere near that interesting.

A number of recent studies have already shown that U.S. wireless isn't just the most expensive in the developed world, U.S. 5G is notably slower than most overseas deployments. That's thanks in large part to our failure to make so-called middle band spectrum available for public use, resulting in a heavy smattering of lower band spectrum (good signal reach but slow speeds) or high-band and millimeter wave spectrum (great speeds, but poor reach and poor reception indoors). The end result is a far cry from what carriers had spent the last three years promising.

PC Magazine was the latest to put carrier promises to the test and came away decidedly unimpressed. Networks certainly are getting faster, the report concludes, but it's largely due to steady evolutionary improvements being made to 4G networks, not newer 5G networks. As such, PC Magazine is forced to admit they bought into early carrier hype promising an amazing revolution:

"We admit it, we bought into the 5G hype. Carriers, phone makers, and chip makers alike have all been selling 5G as faster and more powerful than 4G, with lower latency. So I was shocked to see that our AT&T 5G results, especially, were slower than 4G results on the same network. This is a crisis for marketing, not for performance. All three US carriers showed significantly higher download speeds and better broadband reliability than they did in our 2019 tests. It's just that these gains, particularly on AT&T, are largely because of improvements in 4G, not 5G networks."

Wireless carriers haven't given much thought to the perils of over-hyping 5G, thereby associating the standard with empty bluster and frustration in the minds of consumers. You'll recall that AT&T has lied repeatedly in trying to pretend that 4G is 5G via misleading phone icons, and Verizon perpetually enjoyed hyping 5G market launches, only to have those looking for an actual 5G signal find that availability is these markets is spotty... at best (one study found that a Verizon 5G signal was available around 0.4% of the time in launched 5G markets).

Not too surprisingly then, PC Magazine routinely found it difficult to actually obtain a 5G signal:

"It's been more than a year since the US carriers launched 5G. AT&T purports to have 5G in 22 of our 26 test cities; Verizon has it in 18; and T-Mobile has it in all of them. But our 5G results were disappointing all around, on every carrier. Often, it was a choice between faux G (we’ll explain this shortly) and no G...most of our current 5G coverage offers people a slightly improved 4G experience dressed up with a shiny new icon. That’s not bad, but to live up to their lofty promises about how 5G will change education, medicine, industry, and home internet, the carriers will need to use more spectrum and better technology than they’re currently giving us.

It's also worth noting that despite all the promises surrounding the T-Mobile and Sprint merger, the initial result has been slower speeds overall as the companies work to integrate discordant networks:

"So far, T-Mobile's absorption of Sprint hasn't shown much advantage for consumers. It's to the contrary, really: In our results, it looks like the rush of Sprint users onto T-Mobile's network has created some congestion that has caused T-Mobile to fall behind in comparative performance. All of the carriers' speeds increased from 2019 to 2020, but T-Mobile's increased less than AT&T's and Verizon's did."

PC Mag's study was mirrored this week by a Washington Post investigation that basically concluded all the same things. Namely that 5G isn't much to write home about, and in many instances U.S. 4G networks outperform 5G in 5G launch markets:

"Your experience with a 5G phone in 2020 is likely to be all over the map. I got searing fast 750 Mbps downloads from AT&T in one corner of downtown. But in the same spot, my 4G phone got an also extremely fast 330 Mbps. Moreover, because of the pandemic, those aren’t places I go very often. As I write this from my home office in the middle of San Francisco, I’m getting 11 Mbps downloads on my AT&T 5G phone. On T-Mobile, I get a laughable 8 Mbps on 5G, which is barely enough to stream HD Netflix."

I regret to inform you that despite a lot of tech policy bluster and carrier marketing, we are most assuredly not winning the "race to 5G." In fact, our broadband maps are so routinely terrible, I'm not sure we'd be able to confirm it if we were.

Again, 5G will certainly offer faster speeds, lower latency, and more reliable networks over the long haul, especially as carriers push new middle band spectrum to market. Even then, don't expect 5G pricing to be particularly innovative thanks to the death of net neutrality and reduced competition due to consolidation. Carriers are also lobbying the FCC to exclude 5G from broadband mapping improvements (meaning don't expect an accurate read on where it's truly available any time soon). The more things change...

Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: 5g, overpromise, wireless
Companies: at&t, verizon

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

  • icon
    DannyB (profile), 15 Sep 2020 @ 6:20am

    Verizon ads for 5G

    I am currently seeing an ad blitz from Verizon claiming that their 5G is 25 times faster!

    So it must be true!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 15 Sep 2020 @ 6:43am

    From what I read for 99 per cent of users 4g is actually faster than 5g , there's problems with spectrum eg certain company's own the spectrum
    that is needed for 5g signal to work at long distance,
    4g does not have that problem.
    And the fcc at this point has greatly reduced powers even if it wanted to fix this problem.
    Of course it 25 times faster if you stand within 100 metres of the cell tower .
    It, ll probably take 3 years to build emough towers to provide 5g even in city's and urban area, s

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 15 Sep 2020 @ 8:54am

    I assumed Karl was being hyperbolic when claiming that Verizon was saying that 5G will cause a “fourth industrial revolution.” One could easily read the headline to mean that 5G will be important in that change.

    Then I read the entire press release. They really are claiming that.

    “5G literally has the potential to start the Fourth Industrial Revolution.”

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    tts, 15 Sep 2020 @ 9:51am

    5G was always mostly hype and that stuff from carriers about it being a 4th industrial revolution was flat out hyperbolic BS.

    They're just trying to sell more phones, phone plans, and get a halo effect going for a new premium tier.

    At the end of the day 5G doesn't have significantly better barrier penetration or signal reach than 4G does and is only truly significantly faster at very close (10' or so) ranges anyways. This is also true for 5G in Europe BTW. EU and SK 4G is much better in general than US 4G though.

    Its a physics + signal space issue and tech isn't going to make either of those issues go away.

    Maybe in a few years 5G phones will be interesting to buy but for now, in the US at least, don't bother they're not worth the expense and extra power draw.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 15 Sep 2020 @ 10:36am

    5G may be faster, BUT it's clearly been over hyped. The problem is it's using higher frequanzy which has a much shorter distance. That means you need at least 4 times the cell towers to cover the same area as 3G and 4G. Look how many weak places there still is with 3G/4G all over. In a number of City's, especially S.F. where it's almost impossible to put up a new cell tower. How the F do you think they'll be able to put up 4 times the cell towers there? They can't!!!! The city won't allow them to and I'm sure many other city's are simular. So if you're in the small area of 5G, it should be good, but walk a short distance away and it starts dropping off fast and now you're back to 4G.

    Which is why when people are complaining that the iPhone doesn't have 5G. it's like So what!!! It's pointless!!! It really hasn't gotten much better when the new iPhones come out later this year which I hear will have 5G. Does it really matter? Not really as it's worthless for most people.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 15 Sep 2020 @ 11:05am

    Physics says mm waves are difficult to attenuate. If they didn't have significant range on them they would be useless for cell phones and wifi.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      tts, 15 Sep 2020 @ 11:29am


      Define "difficult".

      The reality is 5G doesn't have any better range than 4G in the real world. This has been shown over and over again in the US and elsewhere. And walls stop it just as well too.

      I could care less for the industry hype. Its real world results that matter here too. So don't go posting some industry PR or tests.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Pixelation, 15 Sep 2020 @ 6:34pm

    Pointing at the wrong thing

    "U.S. 5G Over Promises, Under Delivers"

    I need to correct you here, I hope you can forgive me. U.S. Corporations over promise and under deliver. 5G is marketing.

    Trump over promises and under delivers. He doesn't believe in science. Well, at least it's only 200,000 dead and counting...

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter

Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)


Add A Reply

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter

Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Insider Shop - Show Your Support!

Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.