Thousands Of Academics Pledge To Boycott Springer's New Machine Learning Title In Support Of Long-Established Open Access Journal

from the if-it-ain't-broke,-and-it's-free,-don't-fix-it dept

Among Techdirt's many stories chronicling the (slow) rise of open access publishing, a number have been about dramatic action taken by researchers to protest against traditional publishers and their exploitative business model. For example, in 2012, a boycott of the leading publisher Elsevier was organized to protest against its high journal prices and its support for the now long-forgotten Research Works Act. In 2015, the editors and editorial board of the Elsevier title Lingua resigned in order to start up their own open access journal. Now we have another boycott, this time as a reaction against the launch of the for-profit Nature Machine Intelligence, from the German publishing giant Springer. Thousands of academics in the field have added their names to a statement about the new title expressing their concerns:

the following list of researchers hereby state that they will not submit to, review, or edit for this new journal.

We see no role for closed access or author-fee publication in the future of machine learning research and believe the adoption of this new journal as an outlet of record for the machine learning community would be a retrograde step. In contrast, we would welcome new zero-cost open access journals and conferences in artificial intelligence and machine learning.

The contact person for the statement is Thomas G. Dietterich, Distinguished Professor (Emeritus) and Director of Intelligent Systems at Oregon State University. He has a long history of supporting open access. In 2001, he was one of 40 signatories to another statement. It announced their resignation from the editorial board of the Machine Learning Journal (MLJ), which was not open access, and their support for the Journal of Machine Learning Research (JMLR), launched in 2000, which was open access. As they wrote:

our resignation from the editorial board of MLJ reflects our belief that journals should principally serve the needs of the intellectual community, in particular by providing the immediate and universal access to journal articles that modern technology supports, and doing so at a cost that excludes no one. We are excited about JMLR, which provides this access and does so unconditionally. We feel that JMLR provides an ideal vehicle to support the near-term and long-term evolution of the field of machine learning and to serve as the flagship journal for the field.

That confidence seems to have been justified. JMLR is now up to its 18th volume, and is flourishing. It is "zero cost" open access -- it makes no charge either to read or to be published if a paper is accepted by the editors. The last thing this minimalist operation needs is a rival title from a well-funded publisher able to pour money into its new launch in order to attract authors and take over the market. Hence the current boycott of Nature Machine Intelligence, and the call for "new zero-cost open access journals and conferences in artificial intelligence and machine learning" instead.

As to why Springer decided to announce a competitor to a well-established, and well-respected journal, an article in The Next Web points out that the German publishing company is about to offer shares worth up to €1.6 billion (around $1.95 billion) in its imminent IPO. A new journal covering the super-hot areas of AI, machine learning and robotics is just the sort of thing to help give the share price a boost. And when there's serious money to be made, who cares about the collateral damage to a much-loved open access title running on a shoestring?

Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and +glynmoody on Google+


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • icon
    Stephen T. Stone (profile), 2 May 2018 @ 9:04pm

    On the bright side, the AI takeover of humanity will put an end to bullshit like this.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Pixelation, 2 May 2018 @ 9:15pm

    "... a number have been about dramatic action taken by researchers to protest against traditional publishers and their exploitative business model."

    Unfortunately, this is about our human nature. We want maximum reward with minimum effort. If you want to see the worst of it, look at Washington.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 2 May 2018 @ 11:43pm

      Re:

      When the all the effort to create a journal is provided for free by the academics, and they already have an open access publication, why would the want to spend the same effort with the extra cost of a subscription to allow Springer to make more profit?

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 3 May 2018 @ 1:52am

        Re: Re:

        Err Academics doing there job is not some kind of weird magical thing, peer review is part of the job...

        or not these days if academia is just another reason to exclude people like needing a 4 year to be a cashier at a bank, credentialism is all now and not a single person has any merit.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Agammamon, 2 May 2018 @ 11:32pm

    Machine Learning Journal (MLJ) . . . Journal of Machine Learning Research (JMLR)

    SPLITTERS!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 3 May 2018 @ 1:38am

    IP law should be abolished entirely

    If you want to give flute playing weirdos money, you should.

    http://jethrotull.com/songsfromthewood/

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 3 May 2018 @ 1:46am

    Publish in the public domain

    Explicitly and unequivocally open access just continues the violence that is copy and be subject to violence by armed men kicking down your door.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: Techdirt Logo Gear
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.