It Took All Of Three Hours To Code A Plugin That Makes News Comments More Civil

from the irredeemable-trolls dept

For years now the narrative du jour in online news circles has been that the news comment section is an irredeemable menace. Outlet after outlet has informed us that they care so much about the integrity of public dialogue online that they've decided to ban website visitors from commenting on news articles entirely. Usually, these bans are accompanied by some sanctimonious claim that banning people from speaking on site was done because the outlet in question just really "valued conversation," or because they're just ultra-interested in building better relationships.

In reality, the motivation isn't quite so noble. Most websites just don't want to spend the time and money it takes to cultivate a healthy online community, in large part because bean counters can't monetize or measure the impact of quality discourse. Other outlets don't like having such a visible area where users can point out errors in news coverage. Most really would prefer we return back to the era of "letters to the editor" where the medium gets to dictate whose voices are deemed important, and whose are not. In that way it's often part power play, and part laziness.

Time and time again, these outlets have claimed that banning comments is the only option because cultivating on-site community is too expensive and time consuming. Again though, there's every indication that making the news comments section useful again doesn't take all that much work. In Norway, for example, a five-person team tookt all of three hours to code a WordPress plugin with a comically-simple premise:

"It was a basic idea," NRKbeta developer Ståle Grut told a South By Southwest crowd on Tuesday. "Readers had to prove they read a story before they were able to comment on it."

The plugin doesn't take much work to install, and website operators simply have to build a simple multiple-choice Q&A based on the article to make it work. The coders work for NRKbeta, the tech-testing group at Norway's largest national media organization. And they were quick to point out that asking your on-site community for help (as opposed to, say, implying that their input is no longer relevant) often pays dividends:

"Use your audience," Grut told the crowd. "Talk to them; play with them. They'll like you better for it."

A WordPress plugin could force users to correctly answer a few multiple-choice questions before the page's comment field would appear. Once he got to the office, he and fellow staffers spent three hours building the plugin, which Grut reminded the crowd is wholly open source. "Naturally, this was paid for by Norwegian people, so you can thank them if you want to implement it," Grut said when emphasizing that he was happy if more sites tried it out."

And while the folks behind the plugin note that it's not a magic panacea for all news comment hostility, the fact that they were able to modestly tame news comment hostility with a bare modicum of effort suggests the "irredeemable" and widely maligned news comment section isn't quite the unfixable hellscape many lazy, cheap and threatened media outlets profess it to be.


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 30 Mar 2018 @ 1:57pm

    Please answer the following question before commenting on this article.

    The creators of this plug-in are from:

    A) Sweden
    B) Norway
    C) Wakanda
    D) Fuck you shitstain

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 30 Mar 2018 @ 2:17pm

    Yes, for Techdirt?

    This would be a worthwhile addition to TD. It wouldn't stop the two or three career ACs who troll here, but it might slow them down since they can't read so good.

    BTW, I am very happy that TD has kept their forums open to engage the readers. Not so happy with the quality of a one or two posters who seem to have quit their dayjob to spend more time trolling.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 30 Mar 2018 @ 2:43pm

      Re: Yes, for Techdirt?

      To respond to this comment please answer the following question:

      The correct word to use when claiming someone is bad at reading is "This person can't read so _______."

      A) good
      B) well
      C) Wakanda
      D) Fuck you shitstain

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Pixelation, 30 Mar 2018 @ 3:40pm

    Oh yeah?

    I don't know what the hell you guys are talking about, but fuck you shitstain!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Chip, 30 Mar 2018 @ 4:32pm

    You are Trampling on my "Free Speech" rights to Post whatever "comments" I "want" anywhere I FEEL like! Iti s a Violation of the Section 230! Also sometimes Commenters write Things when they have not "commented" in Several Years!

    Every Nation eats the Paint chips it Deserves!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 30 Mar 2018 @ 4:52pm

    If this app is written in java, do you have to pay a fee for its use prior to each comment or does the site have to do that?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Roger Strong (profile), 30 Mar 2018 @ 5:01pm

    I look forward to the Fox News version:

    Who is responsible for the Stormy Daniels scandal?

    a) Hillary
    b) Obama
    c) The Failing New York Times
    d) School-age anti gun violence protesters
    e) President Donald Trump, the most popular President in history

    Anyone who votes e), will not be allowed to post. Which will be arguably correct, because it will indeed show that they didn't read the story.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 30 Mar 2018 @ 5:27pm

    Some sites don't want people to comment because that would interfere with the ability for their contributors to be proven wrong. Take Forbes, for example; home of tons of stooges, late last year they got rid of their comment section. Shills like Fred Campbell as well as their whole "Washington Bytes" column, which is just a front for pro-ISP tools to spew corporate talking points.

    Then there's the "freedom" advocates on Forbes, like George Leef and Brian Miller. They claim they're all for freedom, but really they're just far-right hacks. What's particularly hilarious is that they have enough pull with the magazine to get articles taken down that disagree with their points of view, like what happened with a piece by Chris Ladd:

    https://www.politicalorphans.com/an-explanation-from-forbes/

    The commenters point out that the explanation for the pulling the article was BS and lies. So much for freedom from those freedom advocates.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 31 Mar 2018 @ 5:04am

      Re:

      Pretty much everybody including gossip and entertainment sites have gotten rid of comments or discussions in the past few years. Its actually disturbing, only 'social media sites' like Twitter or Facebook where they can sell you are allowed, and even there theres now tons of 'hate speech or troll laws' that censor you or even ban you outright if you brake their ability to appear marketable for their main advertisers.
      Hell, even sites where commenting is all they are like Reddit have been heavily censoring anything that goes against the main media narrative or anything even remotely not PC. Even old tech like blogging sites will now censor you or delete your blogs on any complaints, even from a single person.

      Since the media conglomerates took over the web, and forums mostly dead, only niche sites like this or chans are now the last refuge of free speech on the Internet.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 31 Mar 2018 @ 7:16am

        Re: Re:

        I'm not sure you understand what your "free speech" rights actually encompass.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 31 Mar 2018 @ 8:38am

        Re: Re:

        Thou shalt not break narrative, the first commandment of the Internet mainstream media machine.

        It hurts them a lot when people have differing opinions, or worse, other factual sources proving that you're talking shit in that article/blog.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Anonymous Coward, 31 Mar 2018 @ 12:10pm

          Re: Re: Re:

          Trump news ... aka Sinclair Broadcast Group is the only official news source and all you scum pirate lefties who try to publish your fake news are going to gitmo real soon in addition to all those who read and talk about that fake news.

          It will be a big change in the media. The biggest change with the best changes anywhere - bigly.

          No collusion. Where is Hope, I can't find her.

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Hugo S Cunningham (profile), 31 Mar 2018 @ 10:00am

      Religious contribution to Forbes [Was: Re:

      I am no fan of conservative Evangelicals (aka Fundamentalists), but why did you send your denunciation of them to Forbes, a business magazine? Were you responding to a *Forbes* article about or by such a person or people? If there was such a Forbes link in your article, I missed it.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 31 Mar 2018 @ 10:36am

        Re: Religious contribution to Forbes [Was: Re:

        Forbes has expanded to cover a lot of subjects, not just business and economics. Chris Ladd writes under their "Opinion" section which covers a wide range of politics as well as economics, where he's one of the very few sane voices in the midst of think-tank shills. He had no problem submitting other articles to the site, as every other piece he's written is still up there, but apparently this one was the straw that broke the camel's back.

        What I'm trying to get at is that, despite what any of Forbes' contributors have to say regarding freedom, the magazine doesn't actually care about it in any way. The site is full of double standards.

        I remember one time I commented on an article from Thomas Lindsay, who whines about the "crisis" of free speech on college campuses. I pointed out in the comments that Thomas Lindsay once tried taking over Shimer University, attempting to stack the board with conservative-leaning people who share his view, imitating the supposed behavior he chastises liberals/the left for supposedly using.

        https://www.chicagoreader.com/Bleader/archives/2010/04/20/after-all-the-strife-shimer-college- prez-out
        http://www.bopsecrets.org/recent/shimer.htm

        My comment was removed shortly afterward. Forbes' most militant contributors don't like being proven hypocrites or have facts presented to them that contradict the thrust of their article. The magazine getting rid of the comments section completely was inevitable.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Mr Big Content, 30 Mar 2018 @ 5:53pm

    What A Complete Waist Of Tax Payers Money

    The govermnent should NOT be enforcing rules like this. Its bad enough that those of us offering values-oriented viewpoints on the so-called Internet find ourselves CENSERED online, this just gives more power to teh so-called LIBERALS who already DOMINATE far too much online discourse. END THE LETFTWING BIAS NOW!!!!!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 31 Mar 2018 @ 5:05am

    Hours To Code A Plugin That Makes News Comments More Civil.

    But how many hours of code would it take to make News Sites not a biased and clearly agenda driven pieces of crap?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 31 Mar 2018 @ 7:18am

      Re: Hours To Code A Plugin That Makes News Comments More Civil.

      That does not compute

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 31 Mar 2018 @ 8:42am

      Re: Hours To Code A Plugin That Makes News Comments More Civil.

      At least TechDirt's less crappy. Not perfectly unbiased (what human or org is?), but better than most mainstream news sites.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    McFortner (profile), 31 Mar 2018 @ 9:12am

    Aaannnnnd......

    And it will be broken in 5...

    4...

    3...

    2...

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Thad, 2 Apr 2018 @ 9:47am

      Re: Aaannnnnd......

      Even if it were broken...what would that mean?

      It would mean bots could get past the questions, but it wouldn't mean regular old-fashioned trolls would.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Will B., 31 Mar 2018 @ 3:38pm

    Pardon me being the devil's advocate...

    ...but I would be somewhat concerned about such a system itself being used to solidify the inherent bias of a comment section. If, rather than a factual question, the questions were opinion-based, and then filtered out those whose opinions contradicted the obvious bias of the article itself, that would likely serve as an added barrier for dissuade opposing viewpoints; it's hard enough to post opposing viewpoints online without quitting in exhaustion or disgust already, without having to lie about your opinions to even be allowed to post.

    (I fully admit this is a "but what if" post, and a mocking "what if the moon was made of cheese" is a legitimate answer; nontheless, I find the question interesting in its own right, even if applicability to the situation is speculative at best.)

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      John85851 (profile), 2 Apr 2018 @ 10:01am

      Re: Pardon me being the devil's advocate...

      That's an interesting "what if", but here's another: what if someone with a differing opinion actually has a good point to make? I know it's rare, but those people are out there.

      So I think what you're suggesting is a system that weeds out the far-leaning people that rely on "I just know it" rather than evidence and logic.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 1 Apr 2018 @ 5:08am

    What… is your name?
    What… is your quest?
    What… is your favorite color?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Padpaw (profile), 1 Apr 2018 @ 9:55am

    I find it's more news sites dislike getting corrected on fake facts in their stories.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    I.T. Guy, 2 Apr 2018 @ 7:52am

    "Other outlets don't like having such a visible area where users can point out errors in news coverage."

    We have a winner!!!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Show Now: Takedown
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.