The FCC 'Investigation' Into Stephen Colbert Is A Complete Non-Story

from the words-are-but-wind dept

Last week comedian and "The Late Show" host Stephen Colbert found himself in a little hot water after he made an oral sex joke about Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin at the tail end of his opening monologue. If you missed it, here's the relevant bit (the easily-offended can skip down the page).

Obviously, the monologue wasn't exactly enjoyed by Trump supporters, who collectively backed a somewhat rudderless and unsuccessful attempt to pressure CBS into firing the comedian (whose ratings have, non-coincidentally, been soaring thanks to his Trump tirades). Colbert ultimately issued a follow up comment in which he stated he probably could have more carefully chosen his words, but quite intentionally fell well short of offering an apology to Donald and Vlad.

Normally this is where the story would have ended. But last Friday afternoon The Hill ran a piece stating that the FCC had received an entirely-ambiguous number of complaints about the monologue, and was going through the process of determining whether or not Colbert's comments violated FCC broadcast TV indecency guidelines. Under current FCC rules, the agency keeps an eye out for broadcast TV content deemed "indecent" before 10PM, and attempts to police "obscene" content after that point. This is all pretty standard FCC practice, with the end result most frequently either resulting in a modest fine or no action whatsoever.

When asked about Colbert's comments, FCC boss Ajit Pai made a fairly innocuous comment to a talk radio station stating that the FCC would, in essence, manage the Colbert complaints in much the same way they handle every other obscenity complaint:

"We are going to take the facts that we find and we are going to apply the law as it’s been set out by the Supreme Court and other courts and we’ll take the appropriate action,” he told Talk Radio 1210 WPHT Thursday. “Traditionally, the agency has to decide, if it does find a violation, what the appropriate remedy should be,” he said. "A fine, of some sort, is typically what we do."

Again, this is a fairly inane comment by an FCC boss, effectively stating that he was simply going to follow normal FCC process. Yet somehow the narrative quickly shifted in the media, with outlets immediately complaining that Pai's actions were somehow a frontal assault on free speech, or worse. The Writers Guild of America fanned these flames by issuing a statement claiming it was "appalled" by Pai's behavior:

"“As presidents of the Writers Guilds of America, East and West, we were appalled to read recent remarks by Federal Communications Commission chair Ajit Pai,” said WGA East boss Michael Winship and WGA West chief Howard Rodman this morning. “He said the FCC would investigate a joke about Donald Trump by Writers Guild member Stephen Colbert, ‘apply the law’ and ‘take appropriate action’ if the joke were found to be ‘obscene,'” the duo added of the FCC chair’s May 5 response in a radio interview.

Again though, all Pai really said is that the FCC would do what it has always done when investigating obscenity complaints. In fact, you'll note he never even uses the word "investigation." Yet somehow this idea that Pai was engaged in a rogue attack on free speech quickly ballooned to becomce this week's media narrative du jour.

Look, Ajit Pai has done plenty of arguably horrible things in just his first few months in office. He has helped the cable industry protect its cable box monopoly. He's helped prison phone monopolies rip off inmate families. He has started dismantling efforts to bring broadband to the poor. He has begun the process of killing net neutrality, solely for the benefit of telecom duopolies. He helped pave the way to the elimination of consumer broadband privacy protections. He's even taken aim at already-finalized telecom merger conditions intended to improve broadband competition.

Make no mistake: Pai wants to replace meaningful oversight of companies like Comcast with the policy equivalent of wet cardboard. All while pretending -- with the help of misleading, cherry picked data -- that this is all of immeasurable benefit to consumers.

There's been a torrent of controversial or otherwise abysmal things Pai has been up to that deserve attention. Yet somehow the focus this week has been a hysterical over-reaction to a non-story. Yes, Pai has obvious post-FCC political ambitions and enjoys throwing the occasional red meat to what he hopes will be his future constituents. But his comments on the Colbert indecency complaints are quite arguably the least interesting and most innocuous thing the FCC has been up to.

Not only did the press hysteria over the Colbert non-story take the media's eye off the ball, it reinforced the narrative that the press is awash in a "fake news" -- requiring a litany of hand wringing and soul-searching -- despite nobody really knowing what the term even means. And while many were quick to insist this proves "the left" also engages in "fake news," that tends to obfuscate the fact that the problem with modern news most frequently isn't that it's fake (though it sometimes is) -- it's that much of it is just good, old-fashioned shitty reporting.


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 9 May 2017 @ 10:55am

    any investigation by the FCC ought to be centered on Pai! he must be accepting back handed payments to be doing what he is! and it would be far more fruitful than this farce! what Stephen Colbert dis/said may well not be liked by some but unlike what Pai is doing, it isn't illegal!!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 9 May 2017 @ 11:01am

      Re:

      If Colbert wants freer speech he should choose a less regulated medium than public airwaves.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Thad, 9 May 2017 @ 11:19am

        Re: Re:

        While I certainly object to the FCC's restrictions on speech, Colbert didn't run afoul of them. His remarks were made post-watershed, and the offensive word he used was bleeped and his mouth blurred when he said it. Whether or not you agree with FCC violations, there wasn't one in this instance.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        Roger Strong (profile), 9 May 2017 @ 11:21am

        Re: Re:

        (Please flag my response as abusive. The actual wording is irrelevant.)

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 9 May 2017 @ 11:23am

    Regulation

    Look, Ajit Pai has done plenty of arguably horrible things in just his first few months in office.

    Generally with the justification that government regulation is bad. If so, shouldn't government regulations on speech be the exact thing to be getting rid of? (Unlike cable boxes etc. there's an actual constitutional amendment involved here.) Let the free market decide what people should broadcast.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 9 May 2017 @ 11:31am

      Re: Regulation

      >Let the free market decide what people should broadcast.

      The noise floor just got 10dBm higher!

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 9 May 2017 @ 11:35am

      Re: Regulation

      "Generally with the justification that government regulation is bad. If so, shouldn't government regulations on speech be the exact thing to be getting rid of?"

      I am very anti-FCC glad to see someone that might come around to seeing the light. You are correct, regulating foul language over the airways is contrary to the 1st Amendment.

      "Unlike cable boxes etc. there's an actual constitutional amendment involved here"

      Yea, well, there are many other areas this comment applies too but no one gives a shit.


      "Let the free market decide what people should broadcast."
      We tried that but pro-regulatory people and businesses did not like it... and again the citizens didn't give a shit when it got taken away so....

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 9 May 2017 @ 12:09pm

        Re: Re: Regulation

        No such thing as a free market, it is a theoretical model that would not last very long in the real world as it does not account for human irrationality, corruption and illogical bullshit.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Anonymous Coward, 9 May 2017 @ 12:39pm

          Re: Re: Re: Regulation

          No such thing as a free market, it is a theoretical model that would not last very long in the real world as it does not account for human irrationality, corruption and illogical bullshit.

          Well, yes, but there's a whole class of politicians including Pai who pretend like none of that stuff would happen. He ignores instances of real consumer harm to say that, and yet he doesn't reach for that response here (even though it's clear no viewer's ever been harmed by hearing something naughty on a late-night talk show).

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Anonymous Coward, 9 May 2017 @ 4:24pm

          Re: Re: Re: Regulation

          "No such thing as a free market, it is a theoretical model that would not last very long in the real world"

          yes, America became powerful because of luck. nice to see clueless folks around here... not.

          "as it does not account for human irrationality, corruption and illogical bullshit."

          It does, you are just to ignorant and juvenile to understand that. There is no greater power a citizen can wield than where they spend their money. With regulation, you STILL get everything you hate about free market capitalism but NOW with government backed thugs to boot. Where did you get your logic? A crackerjack box?

          Regulation is the cause of this problem right here. The FCC is a regulatory agency that caused all of this so to keep things simple, we asked for this. Now sit back and sleep in the bed your ignorance helped to make.

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            Anonymous Coward, 10 May 2017 @ 3:37am

            Re: Re: Re: Re: Regulation

            I can't find a single sentence in your entire comment that makes sense. Not one. Take this shining example:

            "The FCC is a regulatory agency that caused all of this so to keep things simple, we asked for this."

            What the fuck does that even mean? It makes no sense. And you sneer at the other guy's logic? Wow.

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            Anonymous Coward, 10 May 2017 @ 9:49am

            Re: Re: Re: Re: Regulation

            Your ad hominems aside, the lack of supporting data implies that is all you've got.

            There never has been a free market .. anywhere on this planet.
            America has never had a free market.
            Do you consider barter to be a free market?
            Perhaps your understanding of the term has become polluted.

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Lord_Unseen (profile), 9 May 2017 @ 11:31am

    It's intentionally shitty reporting. If it fits with their narrative, and will get them eyeballs (or clicks) it goes live, no ifs ands or buts. This is the way that places like the Boston Globe and Fox News are alike. If tomorrow, Murdoc woke up and decided that pushing Communism would get him the most eyeballs/money, Fox and Friends would be immediately renamed to Hammer and Sickle. Same thing with every other major news origination. And really, in the current political climate, what sells better than "OMG Government attack on Free Speech!" Looking too much into it might reveal a non-story that won't sell, so they don't.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Thad, 9 May 2017 @ 11:46am

      Re:

      ...are you aware that you just complained about fitting a story into a narrative and then, in the very next sentence, fit this story into a narrative?

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 9 May 2017 @ 12:10pm

        Re: Re:

        Some people are incapable of seeing irony.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Anonymous Coward, 9 May 2017 @ 4:27pm

          Re: Re: Re:

          that is probably why they call it irony.

          World is full of it.

          Regulation is a great example of this, but it's more fun to poke at other people's irony than to learn from our own right?

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            Thad, 9 May 2017 @ 5:39pm

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            that is probably why they call it irony.

            Huh?

            They call it irony because some people can't see it?

            What are you talking about?

            The rest of your post makes even less sense.

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            Anonymous Coward, 10 May 2017 @ 9:56am

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            "that is probably why they call it irony."

            Not being able to literally see would be called vision impaired or blind, not irony. Figuratively, it might be called tunnel vision, indifference or outright deception.

            Not sure what you are attempting to say here.

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Thad, 9 May 2017 @ 11:40am

    There's been a torrent of controversial or otherwise abysmal things Pai has been up to that deserve attention. Yet somehow the focus this week has been a hysterical over-reaction to a non-story.

    It looks to me like the focus this week has been on the FCC website going down after John Oliver's net neutrality story. When I type Pai into Google News, the first two headlines are about net neutrality, the third is "Chairman Ajit Pai is draining the FCC Swamp", then there's one about mergers; the next two are about the Oliver piece, and the one after that is about a different Pai. Colbert's name doesn't appear until the eighth link. Same result if I search for FCC: the Colbert story is eight articles down.

    All that said, I think it's a little premature to say that this is a "non-story". I think the WGA is right to circle the wagons. On what grounds do you think Ajit Pai has earned the benefit of the doubt on this one? I don't find it hard to believe that he'd abuse his authority to retaliate against a comedian who criticized his boss at all.

    By all means, declare it a non-story after the FCC releases its findings and announces that no fines will be issued. And by all means, point out the importance of holding Pai's feet to the fire on net neutrality and other issues (though those really aren't in the WGA's wheelhouse and it's hard to blame the union for focusing on an issue that is). But I wouldn't make any assumptions about what Pai is or isn't going to do.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Thad, 23 May 2017 @ 3:00pm

      Re:

      By all means, declare it a non-story after the FCC releases its findings and announces that no fines will be issued.

      Which is now. Indeed, it turns out there really was no fire there.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Ninja (profile), 9 May 2017 @ 11:44am

    If this has a side effect of making people pay attention to the crap Pai is trying to hammer through and opposition mounts then it may actually be good that there's some shitty reporting after all heh

    Of course I'd rather have no shitty reporting and people actually paying attention and pressuring the guy...

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 9 May 2017 @ 11:59am

    It Starts Today

    If you are interested in helping stop Trump and the other oompa-loompas, check out It Starts Today, https://contribute.itstarts.today/2018. There is power in numbers. If enough people give only $5/day, it will be a game changer.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 9 May 2017 @ 12:04pm

    "A Complete Non-Story"? Perfectly typical Techdirt fare, then.

    The Register is replete with what Techdirt regards as non-stories, especially those concerning Google's rabid spying and multitude of crimes.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    David, 9 May 2017 @ 6:00pm

    Colbert should have listened the the Master

    George Carlin's "7 Words You Can Never Say On Television".

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Sambo, 9 May 2017 @ 7:50pm

    nail

    When you're an asshole, at a quick glance it looks like your always taking a dump.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 10 May 2017 @ 12:42am

    Thought it was common knowledge that Vladimir prefers a nice tight asshole.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    DannyB (profile), 10 May 2017 @ 6:26am

    About what Steven Colbert said

    Isn't truth an absolute defense?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 10 May 2017 @ 9:58am

      Re: About what Steven Colbert said

      One would think so, but apparently in some jurisdictions this is not the case.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 10 May 2017 @ 10:37am

        Re: Re: About what Steven Colbert said

        As Kenobi would say, "So, what I told you was true... from a certain point of view."

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: Techdirt Logo Gear
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.