Two Former Cops Lead Legislative Charge To Shield Body Camera Footage From Public Inspection

from the the-blue-line-goes-all-the-way-to-the-top dept

Body cameras have become democratized, for lack of a better word. They're relatively cheap, easy to use and can be deployed with minimal setup. They hold the promise of increased transparency and accountability, but legislators seem far more interested in ensuring the new technology will have zero net positive effects.

Four Indiana legislators -- two of them former law enforcement officers -- have introduced a bill that will keep the public out of the loop as far as body camera footage is concerned.

A newly proposed Indiana bill would allow police departments to decide whether to release video footage captured on body-worn or dashboard cameras to the general public.

House Bill 1019 immediately drew criticism from the Hoosier State Press Association, which argued the bill could undermine the purpose of such cameras in the first place: to increase police transparency and allow the public to hold law enforcement accountable.

The proposed legislation would compel police departments to show recordings of law enforcement actions only to either the person depicted in the video or that person's relatives or attorney. For anyone else, the decision to release is up to the department.
Leaving the decision to the discretion of law enforcement agencies does nothing but encourage the burial of any footage that doesn't show officers in the best light. Sure, there's a remedy, but it's not an affordable option. The final decision by law enforcement agencies can be challenged, but only if the requester is willing to put a lot of time and money on the line.
Should the agency say no, the bill says, the person requesting the video would have to take the department to court and argue for the video's release.
The legislators behind this bill know exactly what sort of opacity this will encourage. They cannot be that ignorant. They're just playing to their most powerful constituents -- especially the two who were officers before they were officials.

Other supporters of the bill likely know the intended side effects of the legislation as well, but they've decided it's more important to "protect" the police from the public, rather than the other way around. This particularly disingenuous statement from a supportive lawmaker pays the most minimum of lip service to the public's privacy concerns before going all #bluelivesmatter.
Rep. Wendy McNamara, an Evansville Republican, questioned whether the public or media should have access to footage that could potentially compromise the privacy of a person shown in the video, such as a witness to a crime.

"Which becomes more important?" she asked. "The privacy aspect of the individuals involved in the situation, or the public's need to, you know, hang a rope around peoples' necks at the jump of a video?
The "people" she's referring to, of course, are the ones with extra rights and vast amounts of power. Those are the "people" who need to be saved from the big bad Public, who apparently just want to see law enforcement officers hang for their perceived sins -- a desire that wouldn't be so intense if law enforcement agencies performed more "hangings" of their own.

The bill may be altered en route to the governor's desk, but with this type of support behind it, it's likely the legislation will still err on the side of protecting law enforcement. One suggested fix is nothing more than shifting the burden of proof for refusals to the agency denying the request, which would greatly decrease the chance that an expensive lawsuit will be the only route to full disclosure.

In one major way, this bill is worse than others we've looked at. The law wouldn't even require agencies to hand over a copy of available footage to those the legislation grants access to.
While the person shown in the footage can view the video, the bill does not also require the department to give them a copy. That decision is up to the department.
This means those filing abuse or misconduct complaints could be denied access to their own copy of the footage of the incident in question. The accused agency would still have complete control over the footage, making it extremely difficult for accusers to back up their assertions.

There's no excuse for this sort of legislation. The supporters claim to be concerned about protecting the public from its own prying eyes, but they're really only interested in shielding public servants from the people they serve.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 15th, 2016 @ 6:57pm

    They might want to take a look at their neighbors in Chicago. You can hide police video all you want, but as soon as even one cover-up gets outed, cops & politicians might actually have to pay for it these days. If Chicago cops & co. are getting blowback for trying to sweep things under the rug, it could happen anywhere.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    Dr evil, Jan 15th, 2016 @ 8:34pm

    And while we wait

    All video should be turned over to a citizen run/monitored group and available for citizen viewing on demand. If a copy is required, the court should have to authorize but may not deny without a clear - and I mean CLEAR - reason.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Unanimous Cow Herd, Jan 15th, 2016 @ 8:37pm

    Re:

    You can hide police video all you want, but when a cover-up gets outed, Tax Payers regularly have to pay for it these days.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 15th, 2016 @ 9:05pm

    Re: Re:

    Weirdly enough, the "victims are being paid with the money of their friends & neighbors" reminder is usually the one I try to drop into a conversation. But yeah, we pay for it. We've paid for it in the past. We'll pay for it in the future. But if Officer Jason Van Dyke can be charged with murder in Chicago, maybe we at least won't be the only people paying for it.

    That said, the Chicago cop (Jon Burge) who ran the Midnight Squad that tortured* people for twenty years spent a couple years in segregated custody at a cushy prison for perjury (statute of limitations on torture were up**, so no jail time for that) and is now free and collecting his damn pension. Please forgive me if you've that one before, I just feel compelled to bring it up when talking about Chicago.

    _____
    * - Actual, bona fide Hollywood torture: car batteries clamped to genitals type things.

    ** - I'm still not clear on why torture needs to have a statute of limitations in IL. On second thought, duh, yes I am. Because of cops like Burge.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    DigDug, Jan 15th, 2016 @ 9:17pm

    Uh oh - guess who's got something to hide?

    Am I right? What's that all these cops say when they book someone for standing around, doing absolutely nothing illegal?

    If you've got nothing to hide, you'll be fine, right?

    So, tell me, whatcha hidin' there officers?

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6. identicon
    DigDug, Jan 15th, 2016 @ 9:21pm

    Re: Re: Re:

    Think that would stop prosecution of war crimes?

    That's what these badged criminals are, they're "fighting the war on drugs" right? That makes them soldiers, which means they have to follow all the rules, including the Geneva convention which outlaws all of these sorts of things.

    Let's round em up, give them their due trials, then execution time as due for their actions.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7. identicon
    Glenn, Jan 16th, 2016 @ 12:09am

    No problem. No camera footage, no funding. No doughnuts for you!

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 16th, 2016 @ 1:27am

    They know they have done something wrong and they want to hide it.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 16th, 2016 @ 1:32am

    Re: Re: Re:

    Someone somewhere has made a list of dirty cops and will eventually go Dorner on them. Since the state seems more than happy to ignore dirty police officers and the crimes they commit on duty.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10. icon
    That Anonymous Coward (profile), Jan 16th, 2016 @ 4:50am

    Ah yes the insane world of politics...

    We do things to get the all important law & order support, even if it means screwing citizens over.

    The problem seems to be the disconnect in many peoples minds that it hasn't happened to them or anyone in their friend circle... so it doesn't happen. All of these news stories showing unarmed people shot in the back are just setups and twisting the facts... because to accept that some cops are bad shakes the whole worldview they have.

    Pretending to offer accountability while making sure the same broken system can continue should result in a change in leadership... instead they get an endorsement from people who can't imagine themselves on the receiving end.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 16th, 2016 @ 5:00am

    when are the members of the USA public going to realise the regime they are under, ie, a total Police State, where nothing is more important than the security forces being able to do whatever the hell they like with as little, almost none at all, scrutiny from anyone? and that basically includes as high as the President!

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  12. icon
    Atkray (profile), Jan 16th, 2016 @ 8:16am

    I know this sis a bit off topic, but are we better off with this pair in the legislature instead of still being cops?

    My initial thought was yes, but after reading this...

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  13. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 16th, 2016 @ 8:45am

    Re: Re: Re: Re:

    A couple years ago I thought about making a public database of all the bad cops that show up in the news (have to scan & scrape a lot of small local online news orgs to get a lot of 'em). Then I noticed that with copwatch, pinac, Balko, etc., there was probably someone already presenting searchable 'bad cop' lists. Plus, I realized that I couldn't afford a lawyer to handle the kind of LEA harassment that comes the way of the Carlos Millers out there.

    Weird thing is, there are now (finally) tons of people tracking the victims of police misconduct, but I can't think of a decent big list of the bad cops. Can't even find one on copblock (they have a name search, but it uses instantcheckmate.com...?). Anyone?

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  14. identicon
    horse with no name, Jan 16th, 2016 @ 8:58am

    Have rights

    Look its clear that you are not a citisen ever y'all quada has demonstrated the fact that unless you are a violent white man you have no citizenship or rights

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  15. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 16th, 2016 @ 7:06pm

    Easy way to fix this

    Cops need to have their bodycam on and recording at all times (both video and audio). Live feeds will be available to the general public via the internet without restriction. All footage is hosted on government servers for a period of 5 years before being deleted (unless it is used in an investigation or court case). The general public will be able to download any and all footage and store them permanently.

    If a cop's bodycam ever stops recording audio or video, or is impeded in some way (cop covers it with clothing or there's a technical problem), the cop immediately is considered a normal civilian, immediately loses their powers of law enforcement status and will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law for any actions they take.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  16. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 17th, 2016 @ 2:07am

    Re: Easy way to fix this

    good 0ksn. let's make it entirely undesirable to be in law enforcement.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  17. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 17th, 2016 @ 11:16am

    Re: Re: Easy way to fix this

    What a fantastic idea. Let's add being elected to any office to that plan.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  18. icon
    tqk (profile), Jan 17th, 2016 @ 2:12pm

    Re:

    I know this sis a bit off topic, but are we better off with this pair in the legislature instead of still being cops?

    So far, nobody's trying to pass laws making it illegal to watch politicians do their jobs, so there's that.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  19. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 17th, 2016 @ 3:44pm

    Being able to suppress body cam video defeats entirely one side of their purpose - making police accountable for their actions. This bill skews them entirely to becoming another police tool, like tasers and guns, one that they can use at their discretion to bring down a 'bad guy'.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  20. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 17th, 2016 @ 6:50pm

    Re: Easy way to fix this

    Let's say an officer is doing a no-knock raid, gets the wrong house, invades someone's shower, and gets footage of the person naked. Do we REALLY want this footage to be released live? What if the person is filling out their taxes and the camera captures enough information for anyone to steal their identity? Or what if a bunch of people see, live, the police gathering evidence of a crime, and that evidence is later suppressed? How is the person supposed to get a fair trial in that situation?

    Remember that these cameras are filming US.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  21. icon
    klaus (profile), Jan 18th, 2016 @ 9:23am

    Re: Re:

    "...making it illegal to watch politicians do their jobs..."

    Sadly the direction that FOI is heading in both the US/UK, this could become a reality...

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  22. icon
    klaus (profile), Jan 18th, 2016 @ 9:36am

    Re: Re: Easy way to fix this

    An easy solution:

    - Google already have the tools to automatically blur car license plates and faces
    - Facebook do an outstanding job of automatically blocking naked flesh

    Get your Top Tech on the case. What could possibly go wrong?

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  23. identicon
    David, Jan 18th, 2016 @ 10:31am

    Re: Easy way to fix this

    With all the talk of "safe gun" technology, if a body camera is turned off or disabled, the cops gun should stop working.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  24. icon
    JBDragon (profile), Jan 18th, 2016 @ 2:01pm

    The Cop's should be happy to have the Camera'a if they're good Cops. People do all kinds of things, BAD things and then try to make it look like the police did something wrong. Yet here they are just wanting to block it all from the public. To me it looks like the same old same old. The police protecting their own, even though they're BAD. Doesn't seem to matter. As far as I'm concerned, if you protect a bad cop, you're just as bad of a cop!!!

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  25. identicon
    Mattheus, Jan 18th, 2016 @ 2:10pm

    Re: Re: Easy way to fix this

    If it's undesirable to be in law enforcement because you will be held to the same standards as every one else in society, there is obviously something very wrong with law enforcement.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  26. identicon
    Personanongrata, Jan 19th, 2016 @ 3:47pm

    No Accountability Then Withdraw Your Consent

    Two Former Cops Lead Legislative Charge To Shield Body Camera Footage From Public Inspection

    It is clear that many cops only want two things from American citizens they perceive as potential enemy combatants:

    1. Our money in the form of taxes and civil asset forfeiture

    2. Our unquestioning compliance.

    Let the petty-tyrants operating under guise of law enforcement officers fund their incipient police state with a bake sale.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  27. identicon
    Sincan Kombi Teknik Servisi, Feb 2nd, 2016 @ 5:25am

    Thanks

    Sincan Kombi Teknik Servisi, Eryaman Kombi Teknik Servisi, Elvankent Kombi Teknik Servisi, Etimesgut Kombi Teknik Servisi, Çayyolu Kombi Teknik Servisi, Batıkent Kombi Teknik Servisi, Yenikent Kombi Teknik Servisi and Yapracık Kombi Teknik Servisi web team thanks alot...

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
Insider Shop - Show Your Support!

Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.