AP Acts As Extension Of Intelligence Community, Claims Section 215 Shutdown Will Hurt Investigation Of Recent Shooting

from the facts-are-irrelevant-when-fear-needs-to-be-sown dept

Over the weekend, the AP's Ted Bridis released a stupid, fearmongering article that disingenously tied the San Bernardino attacks to the expiration of the NSA's Section 215 bulk phone metadata program.

The U.S. government's ability to review and analyze five years' worth of telephone records for the married couple blamed in the deadly shootings in California lapsed just four days earlier when the National Security Agency's controversial mass surveillance program was formally shut down.

Under a court order, those historical calling records at the NSA are now off-limits to agents running the FBI terrorism investigation even with a warrant.
The post -- which runs for several hundred more misleading words -- was immediately attacked online by Marcy Wheeler and others who actually have been paying attention to the details surrounding the 215 program. Ted Bridis and the AP have covered these developments as well, but apparently felt it better to ignore previous knowledge in favor of spewing propaganda-ish ignorance.

Marcy Wheeler, who was unable to get Ted Bridis to admit any errors, much less sneak a few corrections into his asinine article, has a thorough debunking posted at Emptywheel.
[T]he real problem with this utterly erroneous article is that it suggests the “US government” can’t get any records from NSA, which in turn suggests the only records of interest the NSA might have came from the Section 215 dragnet, which is of course nonsense. Not only does the NSA get far more records than what they got under Section 215 — that dragnet was, according to Richard Clarke, just a fraction of what NSA got, and according to NSA’s training, it was significantly redundant with EO 12333 collection on international calls to the US, which the NSA can collect with fewer limits as to format and share more freely with the FBI — but there are plenty of other places where the FBI can get records.

So the AP didn’t mention all the ways FBI gets records on its own, and it didn’t mention the larger NSA EO 12333 bulk collection that NSA can share more freely with FBI.
But the article was useful for some very non-useful idiots. Presidential candidate Marco Rubio was one of the first to retweet the misleading article. Others like him are using this article as a way to push for a rollback of the recently-implemented reform.

The post would have us believe that the FBI won't be able to investigate this thoroughly or uncover future plots because it no longer has access to bulk phone records. This is completely untrue. It also would have us believe that the shutdown of the collection (as it were) will lead to further attacks in the future -- portraying one small (and ultimately expendable) part of the NSA's surveillance apparatus as an insurmountable loss to intelligence gathering.

Politicians with a domestic surveillance ax to grind are using this point to further their views. Rubio is only one of them. Tom Cotton, who tried to block the implementation of the USA Freedom Act, similarly seized the moment (and Ted Bridis' misleading article) to issue more bogus claims about the shutdown of Section 215.
On Wednesday two terrorists killed 14 innocent people and injured 21 in San Bernandino, California. The hours and days that follow an attack of this nature are critical to discovering its origins and thwarting other attacks. But the FBI has been forced to investigate this attack with one hand tied behind their back because our valuable NSA metadata program was shut down just days earlier.

"To put it simply: the deadliest terrorist attack in the United States since Fort Hood is now serving as the guinea pig in a giant experiment on our national security. It's a frightening and uncomfortable thought."
Once again, the narrative that the FBI has little to no access to phone records is pushed. As is pointed out in Wheeler's post, at the very minimum (if you believe everyone who has been completely wrong on this) the FBI has two years' worth of phone records it can look through, which covers the entire period the attackers were in the US. This may not cover Tashfeen Malik's overseas years, but then again, Section 215 was a domestic program. The NSA's many other surveillance programs would have gathered not just phone records, but internet history, email and other communications. That's if Malik was on its radar, which no one seems to have confirmed to be the case.

So, the FBI would be covered, even in the AP's metadatapocalypse scenario. Chances are, it has years and years of phone records to look through as it investigates this shooting. The NSA has already stated (in its latest FISA court appearance) that records of interest or previously disseminated (to the FBI, for example) will still be accessible by its analysts. Those records go back a minimum of five years. And other records not collected by the Section 215 program go back even further. Marcy Wheeler:
AP misstated how many years of records the FBI might be able to get, claiming it was just two, rather than 28 or more in the case of AT&T’s backbone, covering virtually the entire period during which the husband from the San Bernardino couple, Farook, presumably could speak.
Bridis' article so badly misstates the reality that it encourages theories about government intervention. Did someone nudge Bridis in this direction in hopes of turning public opinion against the recent 215 shutdown? It's hard to believe something this ridiculous would appear unbidden. But, on the other hand, there's no shortage of stupid out there while actual malice remains a far more limited commodity.

Filed Under: fbi, investigation, marco rubio, mass surveillance, nsa, san bernandino, section 215, surveillance, ted birdis


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 7 Dec 2015 @ 12:48pm

    Not to mention it is all still available from the phone company with a warrant/court order.

    The evidence didn't magically disappear.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 7 Dec 2015 @ 12:49pm

    Mass surveillance was justified as a means of stopping attacks, and now its required to find out how the attack happened. Just how much privacy do they want people to give up to make the investigation of crime easy?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Winterfell (profile), 7 Dec 2015 @ 1:05pm

    Ted not Tom

    Typo... Ted Bridis not Tom

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Capt ICE Enforcer, 7 Dec 2015 @ 1:39pm

    Super star.

    You know, when I found out that the NSA and other foreign intelligence communities from around the world were staring at my dick pictures in a windowless room I was concerned. But now that the politicians of the US also want to end encryption so they can see my dick pictures I feel like a true Super Star. My money shot could end the US deficit.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Anonymous Coward, 7 Dec 2015 @ 2:09pm

    Let’s have a party.

    It used to be known as 'The Military Industrial Complex'. We need to rename it 'The Military Industrial Governmental Intelligence Big Brotherish Asymetrical Corpracratiacle Assimilation of Power Hungry Sycophants. MIGIB-BACAPHS

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    annonymouse, 7 Dec 2015 @ 2:19pm

    Members of that mouthful that are in government offices can be refered to as Traditional Unelected Republican Democrat Sycophants.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 7 Dec 2015 @ 2:33pm

    No spine, no journalism, no integrity.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Personanongrata, 7 Dec 2015 @ 4:05pm

    Useful Idiot

    Tom Bridis is a propagandist tool for the US totalitarian surveillance state and is simply licking his masters hand upon command.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 7 Dec 2015 @ 8:07pm

    Big Media, Big Government, Big Business

    The Triad

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    That Anonymous Coward (profile), 8 Dec 2015 @ 12:49am

    We had to push the narrative or we might get our access cut off. It is easier to be a lapdog promoting false information to the public, than to stand up for the truth.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Close

Add A Reply

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Special Affiliate Offer

Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.