Inspector General Says Postal Service Surveillance Program Being Handled Just About As Well As You'd Expect

from the just-another-ho-hum-day-of-bulk-surveillance dept

The US Postal Service has long been the Little Surveillance Agency That Time Forgot. For more than a decade, it has scanned every piece of mail it handles. Its "Mail Isolation and Tracking Control" program went into effect in response to post-9/11 anthrax mailings.

Prior to 2001, it only collected mail data on request. Post-2001, it's much more proactive. The problem with untargeted surveillance efforts is that they dehumanize the millions of people whose mail is scanned on a daily basis. This leads directly to the sort of behavior uncovered by the USPS's Inspector General. When you don't care about your "customers," your work gets sloppy.

These are the safeguards the Post Office has put in place to protect personal information and ensure accountability.

The Postal Inspection Service’s Criminal Investigations Service Center (CISC), the primary administrator of the mail covers program, is responsible for maintaining accountable mail cover documents and Postal Service (PS) Forms 2008 and 2009. PS Form 2008, Letter of Instruction, provides guidance for completing, returning, and safeguarding mail covers. PS Form 2009, Information Regarding Mail Matter, is used to record information from the outside of the mailpiece, such as the sender’s name and address. These forms contain information such as names, addresses, and financial institutions that, if used in the aggregate, could reveal personally identifiable information.
Here's what the Inspector General discovered. First off, the USPS isn't compiling its accountability paperwork (the PS forms listed above) in a timely fashion. The paperwork must be sent to the CISC within 60 days of the termination of the mail cover request. For external orders, the forms are supposed to be returned by the law enforcement agency making the request. For internal orders, the forms are handled solely by USPS personnel. The same 60-day time limit applies.
We found that Postal Service personnel or external law enforcement agencies did not return accountable documents for 49 of 75 files (65 percent). As of the date of this review, PS Forms 2009 and 2008 were unaccounted for up to 762 days beyond the mail cover period. We also found accountable documents for 16 mail cover files judgmentally selected from FY 2015 were not returned timely, not returned at all, or not retained in the mail cover file.
To add to the problem, the postal employees were closing files despite not having obtained all of the required paperwork.
Postal Inspection Service personnel closed 79 of 120 mail cover files (66 percent) during FYs 2012 through 2014 without PS Forms 2009 being returned… Fifty-one of the 79 mail covers involved preliminary investigations (known as area cases) and the postal inspectors should have returned the documents within 60 days of the end of the mail cover period. For the remaining 28 mail covers, postal inspectors should have returned PS Forms 2009 before CISC officials closed the mail cover files or before the postal inspector closed the investigation.
Not only were the investigative files improperly handled, but in-process mail-scanning orders were treated with a similarly cavalier attitude, exposing personal information related to targeted individuals.
During our visit to a facility in the Chicago District, we observed PS Forms 2008, which had the subject’s name and address posted, on the carrier’s casing station. We also found a mail cover request on the supervisor’s desk, which is on the workroom floor and visible to all employees. The manager stated that the supervisor posted the PS Forms 2008 on the carrier’s casing station as a reminder to perform the mail cover.

When not leaving sensitive documents lying around, supervisors were making up their own rules.
[A]t a facility in the Los Angeles District, a mail cover request was approved for one subject; however, the supervisor instructed the carrier to record mail cover information for all persons residing at the address.
And, as if to confirm the "lazy government employee" stereotype, this happened:
During our visit at another facility in the New York District, we found an unopened mail cover request in the inbox attached to the outside of the manager’s office door, where it was accessible to all employees.

That's not even the worst of it.
We also noted the mail cover was dated September 21, 2014, and our visit was 129 days past the [order's] end date. The manager stated he was not aware that the mail cover request was in his inbox…
It's not really an "inbox" then, is it? It's a black hole. Or a trashcan. Or a happy place where mail cover orders go to escape from the harsh reality of being executed in a timely fashion.

What appears to be a program of massive scope but limited use (if you don't want the government tracking your communications/packages, it seems unlikely you'd use a government agency for delivery) is apparently treated as just another tedious part of the job by USPS personnel -- a job very few want to do correctly, if at all.


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 29 Sep 2015 @ 3:24pm

    Maybe if the government wants to have the USPS do something, they should do what the rest of us chumps have to do and just pay for it by, I dunno, actually funding the USPS and not requiring the insane pension congressional grab-ba--I mean prefunding.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      yankinwaoz (profile), 29 Sep 2015 @ 4:26pm

      Re:

      In addition to trying to starve the USPS, I wonder if Congress even thought to fund this mandate? I bet not. Well then, they get what they paid for. Nothing.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      art guerrilla (profile), 29 Sep 2015 @ 6:02pm

      Re:

      1. good point about the pension, just one of the ways shitheel neokons and neolibtards are united in actively destroying the public commons and public services...

      2. *however*, that does not obviate the factoid that the usps has been spying for unka sammie for forever...
      if you think : "Prior to 2001, it only collected mail data on request.", you are living in cloud-cuckooland...
      under hoover they used to -yes- hoover up all kinds of mail, open it up, etc... they were implicated in all manner of dirty tricks campaigns by j edna, etc...

      3. similarly, you may have noticed with some of the manning/snowden revelations, that the sea eye ehh and all the rest of the alphabet spooks, have intercept programs to take packages and compromise computers, etc being shipped to various and sundry targets...
      i am absolutely certain they followed the constitution on each and every one of those unconstitutional search and seizures...
      pretty sure...
      maybe...
      a couple...
      okay, some body once *thought* of following the constitution...
      possibly...

      SHUT UP, submit, and consume, citizen ! ! !

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 29 Sep 2015 @ 3:50pm

    "Its "Mail Isolation and Tracking Control" program went into effect in response to post-9/11 anthrax mailings."

    Spidy senses tingling

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 29 Sep 2015 @ 3:58pm

    Hmm, I know of someone who works at a company who are a supplier to the USPS and the company has to test some of the machines. Access is strictly limited to very few named personnel, any real information is isolated in a lab with very strict access controls (and mixed with random non-real data) with full audit records, and everything is taken ultra-seriously. Lo and behold, they might be wasting their time.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Zgaidin (profile), 29 Sep 2015 @ 4:13pm

    Useless Postal Service

    Other than bulk junk mailers and billing services, who the hell uses the USPS to send anything? Correspondence is done electronically, and if you want to send or receive goods, who would opt for USPS over UPS or Fed-Ex?

    I'm pretty sure we could pass a constitutional amendment removing the fed's requirement to provide postal service, and most people would hardly notice.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 30 Sep 2015 @ 7:49am

      Re: Useless Postal Service

      >who would opt for USPS over UPS or Fed-Ex?

      I know I would. USPS would actually deliver it intact, whereas UPS would smash it to pieces, and Fed-Ex would pretend to try to deliver it and just make me pick it up from their distribution center myself.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      John Fenderson (profile), 30 Sep 2015 @ 9:03am

      Re: Useless Postal Service

      "who the hell uses the USPS to send anything"

      I do. I have two payments a month that can only be made by check, so I use the USPS twice a month to send it.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Glenn, 29 Sep 2015 @ 5:50pm

    We aren't simply customers; we're also their employers.

    Note: the Constitution says nothing about home delivery.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 29 Sep 2015 @ 5:53pm

    If you think UPS or Fed-Ex are any better , you have to remember they're in the private sector , they have very few rules.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 29 Sep 2015 @ 7:42pm

    Here in Minnesota

    We have a system where even when you bring mail into your towns post office to have it delivered to a PO Box AT THAT POST OFFICE it is still sent to a central location 60 miles away where it is photographed and then sent on to its destination (which was only about 3 feet away from where it was when it was put in the mailbox).

    If you have a bill due in town a, you cant risk placing that payment into town a's mailbox as it will be 2 days before it makes it back to town a to be delivered. It is actually quicker to drive the 60 miles and put it in the mailbox at the location that is photographing the mail. Direct words from 2 postmasters in our area.

    Pretty slimy behavior by the post office and our government.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    BernardoVerda (profile), 30 Sep 2015 @ 6:58pm

    "Inspector General Says Postal Service Surveillance Program Being Handled Just About As Well As You'd Expect"

    That bad, huh?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: Copying Is Not Theft
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.