UK Police Carry Out Facial Scans Of 100,000 People Attending Music Festival

from the yes,-we-scan dept

Last year, Techdirt wrote about Boston Police performing a test run of its facial recognition software on those attending a local music festival. Perhaps unsurprisingly, in the UK, land of a million CCTV cameras, the police have taken things even further. As this story in Noisey explains, drawing on a report on the Police Oracle site (registration required):

This weekend's Download Festival will be subjected to strategic facial recognition technology by Leicestershire Police, making those 100,000 plus attendees the first music fans to ever be monitored to this extent at a UK music festival

…

The announcement article on Police Oracle reads, "the strategically placed cameras will scan faces at the Download Festival site in Donington before comparing it with a database of custody images from across Europe."
The ostensible reason for this massive surveillance is to catch people who steal mobile phones, but that really doesn't stand up to scrutiny. The database that the 100,000 faces were matched against was "custody images from across Europe", but it seems improbable that criminals would travel all the way across Europe to this particular music festival in the hope that they might be able to relieve a few spaced-out musicgoers of their phones. Nor was general criminal behavior an issue: apparently, last year there were just 91 arrests with 120,000 people attending. It's more likely that the facial scans were born of a desire to see if the hardware and software were capable of capturing such large numbers and comparing them with the pan-European database. Worryingly, the Download Festival may be just the start:
According to the Police Oracle article previously cited, other festival organisers have expressed widespread interest in technology, pending a successful trial. DC Kevin Walker told the Oracle, "It is one of the first times it has been trialled outside, normally it is done in a controlled environment. There has also been a lot of interest from other festivals and they are saying: 'If it works, can we borrow it?' "
It's easy to see this kind of technology being rolled out ever-more widely. First at other music festivals -- purely for safety reasons, you understand -- and then, once people have started to get used to that, elsewhere too. Eventually, of course, it will become routine to scan everyone, everywhere, all the time, offering a perfect analog complement to the non-stop, pervasive surveillance that we now know takes place in the digital world.

Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and +glynmoody on Google+


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • icon
    That One Guy (profile), 16 Jun 2015 @ 12:09am

    A business opportunity waiting to be taken

    If someone set up a stall selling facepainting and/or masks a modest distance away from the event, I imagine they could make a killing, assuming the police didn't storm it and shut it down for ruining their spy fantasies.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 16 Jun 2015 @ 2:06am

    We all know that this is the direction the UK is heading. Im only surprised about this being publicly announced.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    OldGeezer (profile), 16 Jun 2015 @ 2:57am

    Can't wait for all the false positives that lead to false arrests become massive lawsuits. Facial recognition isn't like DNA where the odds sometimes exceed the entire population of the planet. It's not even like fingerprints where mistakes are very unlikely if there are a decent number of comparison points. SWAT teams will be taking down people unlucky enough to just look like some felon. Wouldn't the odds of a mistake be even higher for innocent relatives who bear a family resemblance? We have been worried that 1984 will become a reality. I think we are heading more toward Person of Interest.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      PaulT (profile), 16 Jun 2015 @ 3:29am

      Re:

      "false positives"

      That's always my main concern too. The technology is a long way from perfect, and even if they were faces can be eerily duplicated - there's a reason why words like doppelgänger exist. All forensic evidence is subject to being tainted and to generating false positives, but at least the actual identification of a subject is performed under laboratory conditions.

      The problem with an Orwellian/Kafkaesque nightmare is that the system actively blocks you from fighting against false charges. Forget SWAT teams, merely being arrested due to a false positive would be more than enough of a problem for most - "sorry sir, the computer says you're not you". How do you fight that if those arresting you won't take alternative evidence? That's a worst case scenario, of course, but it's a possible destination following these kinds of systems.

      "We have been worried that 1984 will become a reality. I think we are heading more toward Person of Interest."

      I was thinking Brazil. Sorry, Mr Buttle, the system doesn't make mistakes, you need to come with us...

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Klaus, 16 Jun 2015 @ 5:34am

        Re: Re:

        I know that UK Data Protection laws carry many exemptions cut out for the police, for example data holders can disclose personal information to police without necessarily being in breach of the laws, and that the police themselves are not obligated to disclose what they hold on a person to that person, but I'm really curious to know how the police themselves get away with retaining this "fuzzy" data for any length of time without being in breach of the core Data Protection principles, especially regarding accuracy.

        For example:

        "We think that Klaus was at the Download Festival yesterday, or possibly his younger brother was"

        is a thousand miles removed from:

        "Klaus phoned his mother yesterday at 19:05".

        Certainly going off their websites, the police themselves have to obey the same Data Protection laws.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        scotts13 (profile), 16 Jun 2015 @ 6:00am

        Re: Re:

        "False positives"

        There's no such thing as a false positive. It's been widely demonstrated that everyone commits some kind of crime, every day. Once you divorce searching for YOU from a specific crime they're trying to solve, it's one tiny step from just rounding up people at random. And once you're in custody, they have to justify WHY.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • icon
          OldGeezer (profile), 16 Jun 2015 @ 8:04am

          Re: Re: Re:

          That may be true because anyone that drives a car violates some traffic law pretty much every day. If I get caught speeding I can expect to be pulled over and ticketed. What I don't expect is to be held at gunpoint or thrown to the ground and cuffed because some automated system thinks I may resemble some criminal.

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Jake, 16 Jun 2015 @ 3:38am

    I suppose the next question is, did it actually work? British government IT procurement being what it is, I somehow doubt it.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 16 Jun 2015 @ 3:49am

    The UK police do their utmost to live up to the Big Brother expectations of their citizens...

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 16 Jun 2015 @ 5:41am

    This is awesome!

    It is just like when you see on the news that the Police tell criminals they won a TV. When they show up to claim their prize they get busted. Now we just need to throw music festivals for terrorists!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 16 Jun 2015 @ 6:10am

    No expectation of privacy in a public place

    I think this idea needs to be reexamined in light of new mass surveillance technology. Just because you could always be recognized on the street doesn't mean your location should always be tracked and stored in perpetuity.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 16 Jun 2015 @ 6:22am

    If I had tickets I'd tear them up and stay home playing my inherited 78's on an air-gapped turntable, behind blackout curtains and under a blanket, with my cellphone in a bucket of water at the far end of the garden so the copyright DMCA freaks can't get me.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 16 Jun 2015 @ 7:31am

    they need to start scanning politicians or how about make it mandatory if you work as a cop or government employee.

    If its good for the serfs why not the lords as well.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    mrhuh (profile), 16 Jun 2015 @ 9:34am

    A suggestion for all in public in the UK

    Perhaps a Guy Fawkes mask would be appropriate? It would in the very least be interesting, until it becomes a crime of course.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 16 Jun 2015 @ 1:51pm

    was probably done to take the UK one step further away from the freedom and privacy it has been renowned for!

    wait and see if i aint right! all these measures are being done to make it easier for the police to go after ordinary people who just get so pissed off with what the government is doing, just as happened in the 'London Riots' a few years ago. it is so easy to tab on to people who dont normally do anything wrong. on top of that, businesses are going again for global take over and have never been closer to doing so than now!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      tqk (profile), 16 Jun 2015 @ 3:37pm

      Re:

      I blame the soccer hoodlums who were terrorizing Europe a decade or two ago. That gave the police a taste for this. They never looked back.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Anonymous Coward, 16 Jun 2015 @ 4:35pm

      Re:

      If the government puts all people in jail, then the only customers left for companies would be governments and other companies. There are only a bit over 200 governments in the world, how many companies would it take to service them, especially if all the people are in jail (prison services might be an exception here)? Then there is the problem of who is going to pay taxes if all the people are in jail? For that matter, if everyone is in jail, who's gonna run the companies, or the government for that matter. Won't the government want somebody to rule over? It seems there is a problem in this cycle, and the government hasn't realized it as yet. I cringe at thinking about what hamfisted measures they are going to take when they do.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    drew (profile), 17 Jun 2015 @ 12:50pm

    All a bit too depressing

    As someone who lives in the UK I can say it's stuff like this that has pretty much made me give up any hope of a future where people are more empowered by technology than oppressed by it.
    Which is why I've largely stopped swinging by here.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    GEMont, 17 Jun 2015 @ 4:50pm

    Popular Myths

    And finally, when the Sherriff says to "Cut'em off at the pass." it really can do it, because he has access to a data base of everyone's daily travel routes, daily living habits, daily routines both in and out of the home, and every person known to each and every human being alive, at his finger-tips.

    But of course such a data base will never be exploited for blackmail, or to destroy an adversary's/enemy's reputation or business, and no criminal, or criminal organization could ever breach the incredibly safe security protecting such a data base, for other nefarious purposes.

    Honest Injun!

    By the way. See that Bridge over there.
    Its mine.
    Due to a financial drop in my other business, I'm forced to sell it dirt cheap.
    A Toll Booth will earn you as much as 3 million a year.
    Interested?

    ---

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Mike Butler, 19 Jun 2015 @ 1:44pm

    Facial recognition tests

    They did this at the First annual Rock On The Range in Columbus Ohio. I was there and police were pulling anyone with a warrant out of the concert. I left before the show was over. It was too orwellian.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: Copying Is Not Theft
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.