DRM Destroys Value: Why Years Old, But DRM Free, Devices Sell For Twice The Price Of New Devices

from the DRM-protects-who,-exactly? dept

Nothing takes value out of a product faster than DRM. Digital rights management has expanded into places where no "digital rights" should exist. What once was something clumsily inserted to "protect content creators" has now become a catch-all term for anything a manufacturer does to ensure that the end user never truly owns the product they purchased.

A small scanner in a coffee maker ensures you'll never use a competitor's coffee, even though purchasers thought they were purchasing a device rather than being sucked into the undercurrent of a revenue stream. The application of inkjet-esque DRM to a souped-up cat litter box means a $200 purchase will be outperformed by its $5 equivalent should you happen to run out of proprietary cleaning solution.

DRM takes purchases out of purchasers' hands. It nullifies the right of first sale by allowing the company -- not the end user -- to determine how the product will be used.

Public Knowledge's John Bergmayer points out that not only does this screw the customer, but it devalues the product itself.

Back in 2010, I paid $99 for an Apple TV--technically, the Apple TV (2nd generation). Recently, it stopped receiving software updates, so I decided to put it on eBay. I was surprised that I was able to sell a piece of four-year old electronics for $161--it's not often you make a profit on old devices.
A 2nd-gen Apple TV isn't a collectors item. It's just worth more to people who want something more from their Apple TV than Apple is willing to give them.
The reason for this is simple--tinkerers have figured out how to jailbreak the 2nd generation Apple TV, but not the 3rd gen one, which is the one Apple currently sells (also for $99).
Despite its name, there's nothing criminal about jailbreaking a device, although plenty of device manufacturers would argue otherwise. Jailbreaking returns control of the purchased device to the purchaser, and certain companies expend far too much capital and effort ensuring they can regain control with the next iteration. These same companies are either unable or unwilling to understand that products a purchaser can control are worth more than those boxed in by DRM.
A device that a user can modify, add capabilities to, and freely install software on is more valuable than one where she can't. And people are willing to pay for that capability. Pre-jailbroken Apple TVs are selling for around $230 on eBay right now.
Brand new: $99. Last generation -- jail broken and untethered: more than twice that.

Certainly, most of the buying public is happy with dumbed-down devices forever enslaved to their makers. Diehard hobbyists, hackers and fans are a market to be courted, but very few companies do so, no matter how "forward-looking" they claim to be when touting their latest products.

Amazon's Fire TV, a direct competitor to Apple's offering, suffers from the same problem, but the company is even more aggressive in its thwarting of jailbreaking. Not only did a firmware update brick rooted devices, it also prevented rollback to earlier firmware versions. What value does that add to the product? What benefit does a purchaser derive from a move clearly meant to lock them into Amazon's ecosystem -- one in which the "purchased" product makes every effort it can to sell them even more stuff?

The market is there for goods you can actually OWN. Products are meant to be controlled by the people who purchased them. The insertion of DRM reverses this long-standing relationship, allowing companies to control purchasers -- and expecting them to pay (sometimes repeatedly) for the "privilege.".


Reader Comments

The First Word

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 27 Jan 2015 @ 8:31am

    Property

    Is still the ideal. Humans just like to own their shit, and business just does not agree. They prefer to lock in their customers because they do not want to work to keep them.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      jupiterkansas (profile), 27 Jan 2015 @ 9:06am

      Re: Property

      Consumers want a product, not a relationship.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Ninja (profile), 27 Jan 2015 @ 9:58am

      Re: Property

      That. If they want to lease the devices then make the prices much, much cheaper.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      tqk (profile), 27 Jan 2015 @ 1:48pm

      Re: Property

      They prefer to lock in their customers because they do not want to work to keep them.

      They don't even want to work to get them. They want sheep who're already willing to be sheared. They've done their market research and learned there's lots more sheep out there than informed consumers, so they can do without complainers like us. It inconveniences them not one bit that I'll never buy anything they're offering, because there's plenty of marks out there willing to fall for this BS.

      I imagine we're derided as "high maintenance" in their board rooms. We used to call this crap "planned obsolescence", where stuff was designed to fail soon after the warranty ran out. That wasn't good enough for them. Instead, they want us to be paying rent and upkeep continually after the purchase. Unacceptable. I refuse to play. I will not buy intentionally crippled tech. I'll also do everything in my power to lambaste anyone foolish enough to fall for this crap.

      If any of our politicians were worth a plug nickel (ie., cared about their constituency), this disgusting practice would have been outlawed years ago. It's fraud. I buy a coffee maker, then I find out I need to buy the coffee from you too? I'll take my money back please, and please go out of business, and please take any other lieing bastards like you with you!

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 27 Jan 2015 @ 2:30pm

        Re: Re: Property

        "I imagine we're derided as "high maintenance" in their board rooms."

        They're just looking for quick and dirty fucks. "High maintenance" is out of their league.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Pragmatic, 28 Jan 2015 @ 5:37am

        Re: Re: Property

        In b4 someone claims that leaving this to market forces to resolve is the solution. It's not.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    John Fenderson (profile), 27 Jan 2015 @ 8:36am

    If I can't jailbreak it, I don't buy it

    When I decided to upgrade my Galaxy (through AT&T), I failed to do my research and went for the S5 as it was the latest model. I quickly learned that the crypto hadn't been broken yet and I couldn't unlock the bootloader or root the device.

    I took it back to the AT&T store and returned it, explaining that I needed the S4 instead, and exactly why. Also, that I will no longer be buying my phones from AT&T, as it the problem was due to what AT&T did to the device rather than the device itself.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Zakida Paul (profile), 27 Jan 2015 @ 9:05am

      Re: If I can't jailbreak it, I don't buy it

      HTC's making it easy for users to root their devices is the reason I decided on the One M8 for my phone upgrade.

      Fiio's allowing users to mod the interface of the X5 is one of the reasons (sound quality and format support being the others) I went for that device over others.

      Kobo's support of the basic .epub format is why I went for a Kobo e-reader over a Kindle.

      If the device ain't flexible, I ain't interested.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 27 Jan 2015 @ 10:25am

        Re: Re: If I can't jailbreak it, I don't buy it

        John and Zakida: I'm curious, what will you do when everything (and i'm not talking just phones) has this DRM? When companies collude with each other to ensure no competitors will offer an open product?

        I'm perfectly happy with my bare-bones flip phone from 07, and i wouldn't even have that if work and family didn't require it, but i find that i am a rarity in that regard. There are enough people out there who will keep buying whatever there is to buy no matter how absurd that the corporations will keep tightening the noose and eventually people like me will be left in a desolate wasteland of consumerist insanity with eyes worn out from constantly buldging at the draconian things society will accept in order to keep up with the joneses.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • icon
          John Fenderson (profile), 27 Jan 2015 @ 10:57am

          Re: Re: Re: If I can't jailbreak it, I don't buy it

          "what will you do when everything (and i'm not talking just phones) has this DRM?"

          Break it.

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    David, 27 Jan 2015 @ 8:36am

    Oh, there is value for customers

    Amazon's willingness to screw over customers trying to get control of their device means that Amazon is a more attractive partner for MPAA and other content deliverers banking on not letting a customer record movies even for private use.

    Amazon will be able to offer content cheaper to the customer if its content providers are reasonably sure that customers will have to pay for every view and not be able in any manner to enjoy content more than once without paying extra.

    Of course, many of today's offerings are such that you will not voluntarily watch them more than once anyway, but probably some houseguest would and be warned off purchasing a viewing of his or her own.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      John Fenderson (profile), 27 Jan 2015 @ 8:40am

      Re: Oh, there is value for customers

      I don't think that explains it, since you don't need to use the Fire to watch Amazon's movies.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        jackn, 27 Jan 2015 @ 10:31am

        Re: Re: Oh, there is value for customers

        Try to watch on android.

        He is a little off, but they sure look for each opportunity to put a talon or two into you.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • icon
          John Fenderson (profile), 27 Jan 2015 @ 10:59am

          Re: Re: Re: Oh, there is value for customers

          "Try to watch on android."

          You can totally watch amazon video on Android, but you need to use their app to do it.

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 27 Jan 2015 @ 8:38am

    Recommend a DRM-free ink-jet printer?

    I have several ink-jet printers that are gathering dust because they simply don't work, and their DRM keeps me from fixing them. I'd love to get a DRM-free ink-jet printer, but can't seem to find one.

    I have several old laser printers that I won't get rid of, because I've already learned how to get around their silly DRM.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 28 Jan 2015 @ 12:31am

      Re: Recommend a DRM-free ink-jet printer?

      proprietary refills are not DRM, they're as old as manufacturing.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        John Fenderson (profile), 28 Jan 2015 @ 7:46am

        Re: Re: Recommend a DRM-free ink-jet printer?

        He's referring to Lexmark, which included straight-up electronic DRM with their inkjet refills, so you could neither refill their own cartridges when they were emptied nor use any third-party ones.

        Lexmark then sued under the DMCA non-circumvention clause when someone broke the DRM. They lost.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    OldGeezer (profile), 27 Jan 2015 @ 8:46am

    Same thing was true for years ago for DVD recorders. On C-band satellite the premuim channels and even some basics began blocking recording for all the newer DVD burners. When I tried to replace my older machine I found out used ones of that model were going for much more than I paid new. I solved the problem by using the old one as a tuner connecting the video output to a newer recorder.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 27 Jan 2015 @ 8:48am

    forget everything else and just concentrate on the one thing that screws up the experience for customers, regardless of what the item is and then thank the entertainment industries and Congress for doing just that! and the only ones impacted are the members of Congress with the 'encouragement flowing into bank accounts and the customers who cant use the modern items because of the greed and the fear of the makers!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Angel (profile), 27 Jan 2015 @ 9:07am

    I was actually planning to by a fire tv until I learned that you could no longer root it. I don't want to have to forgo updates just to be rooted. So I guess Amazon doesn't need my money.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Angel (profile), 27 Jan 2015 @ 9:08am

    Ok let me fix this for myself WHY DOESN'T TECHDIRT ALLOW COMMENT EDITING?!?!?!

    *"I was actually planning to buy a fire tv until I learned that you could no longer root it. I don't want to have to forgo updates just to be rooted. So I guess Amazon doesn't need my money."

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      tqk (profile), 27 Jan 2015 @ 2:05pm

      Re:

      WHY DOESN'T TECHDIRT ALLOW COMMENT EDITING?!?!?!

      Because they expect you to have enough brains to proofread and "Preview" prior to "Submit"! Idiot.

      Physician, heal thyself.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        John Fenderson (profile), 27 Jan 2015 @ 2:24pm

        Re: Re:

        I guess that makes me an idiot as well. Fair enough, I've suspected it for decades. :)

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • icon
          tqk (profile), 27 Jan 2015 @ 2:42pm

          Re: Re: Re:

          Ya know, we have enough people fat fingering and relying on autocomplete while replying via cellphones. It would be nice if people would *care enough about what they write for me to want to read what they write* that they'd bother to proofread before sending! TD supplies a "Preview" button. Use it! Yes, I know you're in a hurry. Don't be! Meh.

          FWIW, I seldom (if ever) have any trouble understanding you. Others, not so much.

          /rant

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      PaulT (profile), 28 Jan 2015 @ 1:15am

      Re:

      "WHY DOESN'T TECHDIRT ALLOW COMMENT EDITING?!?!?!"

      Because there's enough dishonesty and trolling in some parts around here without some people being able to retroactively change what others see them writing.

      Even intelligent people make mistakes and typos, but the honest ones among us shouldn't mind admitting and correcting them, even if it can be a little annoying.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    boomslang, 27 Jan 2015 @ 9:11am

    hurts my soul

    As a developer, it hurts my soul to think about how many hours of developers' time goes into deliberately making software products worse.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      John Fenderson (profile), 27 Jan 2015 @ 9:29am

      Re: hurts my soul

      Just think how the developers feel.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 27 Jan 2015 @ 10:27am

        Re: Re: hurts my soul

        developers are probably lied to. shown some weird (sponsored by MPAA, using MPAA math) how the company is failing financially due to piracy, and the developers *NEED* to come up with some kooky plan to thwart pirates.

        because the pirates steal from the bottom line; and that affects raises.

        the developers, with a desire to see their quality work reach great heights, allows a DRM wrapper to be placed around their weeks of unpaid overtime and late nights.

        when the product doesn't achieve greatness, because hot features were swapped with the mediocre DRM module, developers shows a sad face.

        And the company can chant its new mantra - "As long as the DRM works, we aren't losing customers"

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • icon
          John Fenderson (profile), 27 Jan 2015 @ 11:01am

          Re: Re: Re: hurts my soul

          "developers are probably lied to"

          They are, but most developers are well aware that the lies are lies. The issue is that the developers don't get to make those sorts of decisions. They are given the requirements and have to implement them, whether they like it or not.

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            PRMan, 27 Jan 2015 @ 12:22pm

            Re: Re: Re: Re: hurts my soul

            Several of us were tasked with writing a spam engine once and we all threatened to quit en masse. 5 developers quitting at once would have crippled the company, so they relented.

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            • icon
              John Fenderson (profile), 27 Jan 2015 @ 1:42pm

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: hurts my soul

              Yes, in smaller shops developers have much more say, which is one of the reasons why I strongly prefer to work with and for smaller shops.

              Most developers don't have that luxury, though. Where I am currently employed, there are a couple of hundred developers. It would be very difficult to pull off something like that here.

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

              • identicon
                Anonymous Coward, 27 Jan 2015 @ 3:16pm

                Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: hurts my soul

                It's too bad that software developers never unionized. And of course the bigger the company, the more politicized the work environment tends to be.

                reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Shmerl, 27 Jan 2015 @ 9:12am

    Of course it devalues the product

    DRM is always aimed at crippling usability in some way. So it always reduces product quality.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 27 Jan 2015 @ 9:32am

      Re: Of course it devalues the product

      People who aren't sure enough about a product to buy it second hand, probably aren't sure enough about a product to jailbreak it.

      If I am a hardware manufacturer with DRM coming out the buttock, I will still laugh all the way to the bank when I can keep selling my increasingly inferior crap. I wouldn't get any share of second hand anyway so why should I care about that, except for suing and in other ways discourage such unwanted behaviour?

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Chris Brand, 27 Jan 2015 @ 9:43am

        Re: Re: Of course it devalues the product

        Personally, I'd be looking to sell two version of the product - the "mass market" one with the DRM plus the "hackers delight" pre-jailbroken version for an extra $50 or so. Why not capture that extra value ? (Particularly as the development costs for the latter should be less).

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • icon
          tqk (profile), 27 Jan 2015 @ 2:17pm

          Re: Re: Re: Of course it devalues the product

          Or, they could sell the "Walled Garden" version to the sheep for $50 more, and us plebes who're willing to do without the "Advanced Features" get a deal.

          It amazes me that anyone sells anything these days. Why would anyone buy this crap? I much prefer old stuff that still works. Why buy new stuff that doesn't, or that only barely does dependant upon ...?

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    andrew_duane (profile), 27 Jan 2015 @ 9:14am

    Sometimes it's not only DRM that does this

    While DRM is certainly responsible for this a lot of the time, sometimes it's good old-fashioned feature creep.

    Example in point: iPod Nanos. I love my 5th gen nano, but the newer ones are twice the size and dropped half the useful simple things in an effort to cram more useless "spiffiness" into them. The result: used 5th gens sell for considerably more than new 6th gens on Ebay. When mine finally dies, I will go there to buy one rather than fork out $150 for a new one from Apple.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 27 Jan 2015 @ 9:26am

    Just as a side note, I think this article is a bit outdated:
    http://snow3rd.com/

    The Apple TV 3rd gen. is already hacked...

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      MalwareIntercept, 27 Jan 2015 @ 10:22am

      DON'T USE SNOW3RD

      The Jotti and Virustotal scanners show the file available there is nothing but an adware Trojan.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 27 Jan 2015 @ 10:51am

        Re: DON'T USE SNOW3RD

        Damn sorry, I didn't realize... Reporting myself now

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          john, 27 Jan 2015 @ 12:14pm

          Re: Re: DON'T USE SNOW3RD

          There have been, at most, "tethered" jailbreaks for a previous rev. of the 3rd gen Apple TV. That means you need to attach it to a computer via USB when you turn it on. It's pretty inconvenient.

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Jason, 27 Jan 2015 @ 9:30am

    The analogy I often use when describing DRM to lay people is buying a car.

    If you could only buy gas at one chain of stations, only have service performed by the dealer, only listen to approved radio stations, and only drive in cities the manufacturer sanctioned---all under a possible penalty of massive fines and jail time---would you buy the car?

    Maybe you would, who am I to say? (Maybe you think it's a really cool looking car and that outweighs the restrictions.) But if nothing else, it better be a lot cheaper in exchange for all that.

    Not a perfect analogy, to be sure. But it hits at the value aspect of the argument, I think.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      John Fenderson (profile), 27 Jan 2015 @ 9:44am

      Re:

      "would you buy the car?"

      If the car were cheap enough, then maybe. It would have to be cheap enough to be considered disposable, since I certainly wouldn't be getting it serviced. $500 new, perhaps?

      But what I would never buy is a car that can be disabled by the manufacturer if they decide they don't want them on the road anymore, they don't like me, or any other reason.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        Gwiz (profile), 27 Jan 2015 @ 9:54am

        Re: Re:

        But what I would never buy is a car that can be disabled by the manufacturer if they decide they don't want them on the road anymore, they don't like me, or any other reason.

        Isn't that basically a built-in feature these days with new cars? They all have some form of OnStar/SYNC/UConnect/etc. in them don't they? I'm pretty sure the ability to kill your car and lock the doors with OnStar exists even if you don't pay for the service.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Anonymous Coward, 27 Jan 2015 @ 10:04am

          Re: Re: Re:

          correct, Onstar does not disable the product if you do not pay, they just don't provide you any benefits.

          So Onstar works for the law, but not y'all.

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • icon
          John Fenderson (profile), 27 Jan 2015 @ 11:04am

          Re: Re: Re:

          "I'm pretty sure the ability to kill your car and lock the doors with OnStar exists even if you don't pay for the service."

          This is true, and is one of the main reasons why I don't buy cars made in recent years. Some day I won't have that option. Fortunately, for now anyway, it is trivially easy to disable those systems. When the day comes that I have a car that includes one, I'll just disable it.

          It is almost a certainty that if the day comes when these systems are not trivial to disable, some car expert will figure out a way to disable it anyway.

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            Anonymous Coward, 27 Jan 2015 @ 3:02pm

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            And that automobile modchipper could be on his way to sharing a jail cell with a Playstation modchipper.

            It's only a matter of time before cars become much like printers and game consoles, proprietary systems designed to reap profits on the back-end. It's no secret that Tesla makes more money selling a replacement [proprietary] battery than selling the car.

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            • icon
              John Fenderson (profile), 28 Jan 2015 @ 7:51am

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

              "And that automobile modchipper could be on his way to sharing a jail cell with a Playstation modchipper."

              Perhaps, but the important point there will be people doing it anyway. And if I can't find anyone, I'd probably just take a stab at it myself.

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 27 Jan 2015 @ 10:35am

      Re:

      A while back, a little known company (Sony) sold a slightly popular game (PS3).

      Part of the appeal of the PS3 was that the military was building a super-computer using OtherOS, while tinkerers were building apps in Linux that could utilize the controller and output to your TV

      DRM - and its laws - allowed Sony to one day Remove OtherOS because it didn't like how one tinkerer tinkered.

      That's right - the product changed after purchase because the manufacturer didn't like the direction of the tinkering.

      Sony "regretted the mistake", and compensated everyone with a free game.

      So, DRM is more complicated than buying a car you can only service at an authorized service station. You describe perfectly the TOS or License to use said product(s).

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        PRMan, 27 Jan 2015 @ 12:25pm

        Re: Re:

        "A free game"

        A free game that most of their customers already had....

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Anonymous Anonymous Coward, 27 Jan 2015 @ 1:55pm

          Re: Re: Re:

          I bet the military enjoyed their 1600 or so copies of that free game. (1600 is the number of computers I remember being in their super computer, but I could be wrong)

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      tqk (profile), 27 Jan 2015 @ 2:23pm

      Re:

      You forgot the bit where the car lights itself on fire if you don't comply with the warranty terms.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 27 Jan 2015 @ 10:08am

    Onstar = FBIstar

    The FBI has already used Onstar to covertly listen in on conversations in an Onstar-equipped automobile. Google it.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 27 Jan 2015 @ 10:17am

    On a side-note to the DRM issue, I am loathe to get rid of an older, high-end Toshiba DVD player gathering dust at home because it is Macrovision-free.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 27 Jan 2015 @ 10:19am

    Who didn't see this coming? I've been ranting about this for over a decade and back then no one wanted to hear it. Well, here we are. To all those who didn't care you done shat where you eat. Bon apetite.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Adam (profile), 27 Jan 2015 @ 10:36am

    As much as I hate this model of business I admit that I'd go for...say a car that costs 50% of retail with a special type of gas that I can only buy from the manufacturer. I'd be completely happy with that. I disagree when I'm roped into it promising a cheap car without the special gas disclosure but finding out that putting normal gas into might break my car.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      John Fenderson (profile), 27 Jan 2015 @ 11:07am

      Re:

      "say a car that costs 50% of retail with a special type of gas that I can only buy from the manufacturer."

      What if that special gas costs 50% more than normal gas? You may end up paying a lot more over the life of the car even with the initial 50% discount.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Spaceman Spiff (profile), 27 Jan 2015 @ 1:48pm

    Just say no!

    When it comes to DRM-encumbered devices, discs, etc. JUST SAY NO! Refuse to purchase any such item - the market needs to speak up about this egregious violations of our rights as purchasers. If we are just renting something, then that should be made clear in the terms of purchase. If we are BUYING it, then we own it, and can do with it what we want, and if the vendor subsequently "bricks" it so we cannot use it, they should be liable for treble damages! After all, they have stolen our goods from us!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 27 Jan 2015 @ 3:35pm

    DRM means fascism.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Deb Rice, 28 Jan 2015 @ 3:25am

    value for money

    I can't say I understand all this but I wouod like to ask a question? I have a galaxy note 2 and was tempted to upgrade to a note 4. Am I better to send tick with my note 2?
    Also I have htc desire from anout 3/4 years back. Advice please

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Deb Rice, 28 Jan 2015 @ 3:26am

    value for money

    I can't say I understand all this but I wouod like to ask a question? I have a galaxy note 2 and was tempted to upgrade to a note 4. Am I better to stick with my note 2?
    Also I have htc desire from anout 3/4 years back. Advice please

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      JP Jones (profile), 28 Jan 2015 @ 12:22pm

      Re: value for money

      Not really the right place for this, but if you don't understand "all this" then it's probably fine to upgrade. If you aren't planning to root your phone (or don't know what that means) the Note 4 is a pure upgrade.

      To my knowledge, however, the Note 4 is rootable. I've had both (Note 2 and 4) and find the 4 is a significant upgrade over the 2. The screen is amazing, the camera is fantastic, and the S-Pen is far more useful and accurate. So far the battery life has been better, and I'm a fan of the "Private Mode" with fingerprint unlock to secure private data but leave the phone able to unlock quickly for normal use.

      Granted, I haven't rooted my phone as I've found the default interface works fine for my purposes and any advanced features I want are easily covered by Tasker even without root. Rooting is only useful if you're going to use it for a specific purpose, otherwise it's really a waste of time.

      I appreciate that it's available, and if I found some software that could only be used rooted that I wanted, I'd root in a heartbeat. But between Tasker and the fact that Wi-Fi tethering no longer requires root (I use my Note 4's 4g to give internet connection wirelessly to my Nvidia Shield Tablet) I haven't seen much point.

      Overall Android is only restrictive if you're a power-user interested in the absolute limits of your device. For the average user you probably wouldn't even notice the difference between your rooted and standard phone, and even for power-users there's a surprising amount you can do even without root. I wouldn't worry about it, but it's nice to have the option.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        John Fenderson (profile), 30 Jan 2015 @ 2:18pm

        Re: Re: value for money

        "Rooting is only useful if you're going to use it for a specific purpose, otherwise it's really a waste of time."

        It's pretty much mandatory if you are at all concerned about securing it. You have to root in order to install a firewall, for instance.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 28 Jan 2015 @ 6:27am

    Onstar

    Even if the car owner doesn't subscribe to Onstar service. The car manufacturer still receives real-time location data on all Onstar equipped cars and stores that data. That data can then be sold for a profit to 3rd parties.

    So whether you subscribe to Onstar or not. Onstar still makes a profit off you, the car owner. As the old saying goes. Your personal information is the product being bought, sold, and traded for profit. In this case it's your real-time location information.

    Onstar might even be uploaded how many times you exceed the speed limit and sell that data to insurance companies for profit. It's hard to tell what's being uploaded with cellular modem and GPS equipped cars. I personally rip all the antennas off new cars I buy. I hate my personal life being the product being sold.

    If I need GPS navigation. I use a GPS device which can only receive a signal, not transmit one.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Peter, 13 Mar 2016 @ 4:32am

    I ditched my Fire TV for other streaming devices

    I bought a Fire TV in 2014, my first streaming device. It has subsequently been replaced by a Roku 4, which supports more apps, and an Nvidia Shield Android box. Unfortunately, Amazon hasn't developed an app for Android TV, so I view Prime Video much less than I used to.

    I would never again consider a streaming appliance that locks me into a seller's ecosystem (Apple TV being the worst). That defeats one of the major benefits of streaming, which is choice.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Show Now: Takedown
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.