'Anarcho-Capitalist' Stefan Molyneux, Who Doesn't Support Copyright, Abuses DMCA To Silence Critic

from the funny-how-that-works dept

I'm not one who gets tied up in particular philosophies or philosophical movements, so I have to first say that until someone on Twitter pointed this story out to me, I had no idea who Stefan Molyneux was. I was vaguely aware that there were folks supportive of anarcho-capitalism, but I tend to find people who identify too much with philosophies, rather than realities, a bit tiresome. Either way, Molyneux, who writes and speaks frequently about being against "state" violence and has spoken out about how he doesn't support intellectual property law, apparently chose to make use of the DMCA to take down a bunch of videos from "TruShibes" an account that apparently has mocked Molyneux and apparently hypocritical actions/statements he's made. As I type this, this is what TruShibes' YouTube account looks like:
In going through a whole bunch of commentary on this, there appears to be an awful lot of personal animosity going back and forth between certain people who don't like each other very much, so beware that when you read some of the source documents or view some of the video discussions, they assume a level of knowledge with many of the players that you may not be familiar with. For example, this video by "anarchocap" appears to be the most thorough, but is fairly confusing at the beginning if you don't know who anyone is.
The key point, however, is that a guy working for Molyneux's "Free Domain Radio," named Michael DeMarco, has admitted that he issued the DMCA notices on behalf of Free Domain Radio not because of any legitimate copyright reasons, but because he claims that some of the people who had called in to Molyneux's talk show had been harassed. Apparently, there was another account, FreeDomainDamon, that was using Molyneux's videos to highlight details of his callers. However, it appears that TruShibes was not doing that, but was rather calling out activities that TruShibes found to be hypocritical by Molyneux, with a specific focus on him supposedly bullying callers. In that video above, there's also a clip of Molyneux basically saying he doesn't support intellectual property law.

That video also highlights a post on Molyneux's Facebook page in which he declares "IP must die" in response to an article by Mark Cuban on reforming patents.
So it's always interesting when people claim to not support intellectual property laws at all, but then abuse them for their own benefit. Furthermore, Molyneux went on to Joe Rogan's podcast and flat out admits that the DeMarco did this for reasons that had nothing to do with copyright. It's at about 50 minutes into the linked clip. Specifically, he says:
Molyneux: So there was a guy... I won't say troll, because that will poison the well. There was a fellow out there.

Rogan: A gentleman.

Molyneux: A gentleman of trolly persuasion. I do these call in shows, and people talk about philosophy and ideas and whatever. And he had gotten some of those calls, and through means I don't pretend to understand, you know doxxing -- where you start revealing people's personal information -- he got pictures of their kids, he found out where they lived...

Rogan: What?!?

Molyneux: He had just done stuff where he was...

Rogan: So someone called in and he got pictures of their kid?

Molyneux: What can I tell you?

Rogan: Why would he do that?

Molyneux: Can I pretend to know why people do this, no.

[....]

Molyneux: So, everyone uses my stuff and I don't care about it. You can do a search on YouTube for my stuff and everybody who said 'I'd really like to reuse your stuff' I'm like 'hey, go for it.' Right? But we had a number of listeners who called in and said, 'listen, this guy is doing some pretty creepy stuff with my personal info here, I'm not comfortable with this.' So we used that mechanism to take that down. It's got nothing to do with copyright or anything like that, I just felt that listeners were being acted against in a negative way. A significantly negative way, so that's what we did. It's got nothing to do with copyright or anything like that. People use my stuff all the time.
Now, Molyneux's position that the trolling/harassment was a problem is a perfectly reasonable argument to make. But YouTube has a process for dealing with harassment and cyberbullying, and it's not abusing federal copyright law to silence those videos. And, while it's unclear if FreeDomainDamon was actually bullying Molyneux's readers, from everything that people have been presenting online in various forums, it seems pretty clear that TruShibe was not doing that, but was merely critical of Molyneux. However, thanks to multiple copyright claims against TruShibe's YouTube account, the entire account has been taken down.

It does seem odd for someone who claims to be an anarchist and against "state violence" to then use copyright law to take down critical videos. I can understand the desire to avoid having listeners intimidated or harassed, but abusing copyright law seems like the wrong way to go about it. Not that it seems likely this will lead to a lawsuit, but the very fact that Molyneux flat out admits that this "had nothing to do with copyright" while using copyright law to silence a critic suggests that he may have opened himself up to DMCA 512(f) claim for "materially misrepresenting" his copyright claim with regards to the videos (many of which would have a strong fair use claim as well.

Either way, if you're going to go around claiming that you're against intellectual property and an "anarcho capitalist," it's going to look pretty sketchy when you use a federal law like copyright to censor someone else's speech that is critical of you.

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    icon
    Black Bellamy (profile), Aug 22nd, 2014 @ 9:13am

    Isn't that just free money on the ground right there? I mean (f) is very very clear and the guy flat out admits to violating (1) and (2). If your account is monetized and some jerkoff gets it closed, that's your injury right there.

    There should be a line of attorneys at the guys door, no?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    identicon
    S. T. Stone, Aug 22nd, 2014 @ 9:13am

    You know, with Molyneux openly admitting to DMCA abuse, can't TrueShibe technically sue over the filing of false DMCA notifications?

    This seems like the perfect time for some plucky IP lawyer to step in on TrueShibe's behalf and see how far Molyneux really wants to take this case.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 22nd, 2014 @ 9:21am

    Recall it was actually one of Molyneux's lackeys who did the dirty deed. So the question becomes: how many times will this guy bounce after being thrown under the bus?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    icon
    Ninja (profile), Aug 22nd, 2014 @ 9:26am

    If there was due process and proper punishment for bogus copyright notices we'd see much less of that. And much less DMCA complaints. Guess who isn't interested in due process and such punishments?

    In other news Mickey mouse turns 175 and is still protected by copyright.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    icon
    Chronno S. Trigger (profile), Aug 22nd, 2014 @ 9:30am

    Did Molyneux actually file a DMCA takedown or use one of the many other ways Youtube has to screw people over?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    icon
    Kaega (profile), Aug 22nd, 2014 @ 9:55am

    Opportunities

    I feel that just because you don't believe a law/rule is right, doesn't mean you shouldn't use it to your advantage when given the chance. Most would refer to this as "playing the game"

    I've seen co-workers time after time be turned down for a job their over qualified for to someone who's absurdly under qualified just because that person is willing "tweak" stats or numbers. It's hard to complain to someone doing this, because after all the industry is rewarding them for this behavior. I'm sure we all know the effects of conditioning and positive reinforcement.

    I personally feel those who don't take advantage of the rules to achieve their goals are fools. Although I wouldn't have announced it on the radio.

    Molyneux is not changing his stance on his beliefs, just acknowledging this is how he accomplished his goal. If anything this should demonstrate the blatant errors of the DMCA.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    icon
    John Fenderson (profile), Aug 22nd, 2014 @ 9:58am

    Color me surprised

    And here I thought that "anarcho-capitalist" (like "crypto-fascist") was basically just a term that was exclusively used by college pseudo-intellectuals trying to get laid.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  
    icon
    Mike Masnick (profile), Aug 22nd, 2014 @ 10:07am

    Re: Color me surprised

    And here I thought that "anarcho-capitalist" (like "crypto-fascist") was basically just a term that was exclusively used by college pseudo-intellectuals trying to get laid.

    Was kind of my impression too. Though, you know how there's always that one creepy dude who hangs around college kids long after he should be gone... ? :)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  
    identicon
    Skeptic at Heart, Aug 22nd, 2014 @ 10:08am

    DeFOO

    I want to point our there is another level of hypocrisy not mentioned in this article. Molyneaux advocates that his members end relationships with anyone who remains a statist after being shown "the one true way" of AnarchoCapitlism. He uses the "against me" argument, saying those folks are willing to use the gun of the state against you for your beliefs.

    From a man willing to use the gun of the state to stop Tru Shibes from pointing out how crazy his own words are (what most of the videos were) he is showing his members he is a statist willing to use the gun of the state to get whatever he wants, even if the charges are completely fraudulently. Therefore, all FDR members should end their relationship with Molyneaux ASAP. But, since many members are so deep into the group, they pretty much worship Stefan, so they cannot even see the hypocrisy of his actions and accept his BS explanations. Go to the FDR forums and read the thread under general messages entitled "Because people have asked" and see if the cognitive dissonance doesn't destroy your own mind with frustration!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10.  
    icon
    Mason Wheeler (profile), Aug 22nd, 2014 @ 10:15am

    It does seem odd for someone who claims to be an anarchist and against "state violence" to then use copyright law to take down critical videos.

    It's not odd at all; it's perfectly consistent with that view of the world, which for all its high-minded talk of principles generally has one overriding guiding principle at its core: "Me First!"

    Afterall, if even their dear Supreme Leader, Ayn Rand, took government assistance when it benefited her, why shouldn't the rank and file do the same thing?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11.  
    identicon
    Dana Nutter, Aug 22nd, 2014 @ 10:15am

    Mirror

    For those interested there have been a few mirrors of the Tru Shibes channel, though none of them complete but enough to get a good idea of the criticisms of Molyneux.

    Here's the one that seems most comprehensive.

    https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXtp2ZZWZcRrhrR9ICWO71g


    And while I'm at it, shameless self-promotion of my own Molyneux article, including links to many more resources.
    http://dana.nutter.net/blog/?date=2014-08-18

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  12.  
    identicon
    Adrian Lopez, Aug 22nd, 2014 @ 10:20am

    False DMCA claims should carry serious penalties, but the more immediate problem here seems to be YouTube's terrible handling of DMCA notices. It seems that if you send enough takedown requests within a short time frame, YouTube will treat them each as separate "strikes" and immediately delete your account.

    It also highlights a major problem with how the DMCA ought to be interpreted: Should takedown requests count as strikes even before the person accused of infringement has had a chance to respond? Should they count as strikes even after a counter-notice has been filed?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  13.  
    identicon
    Adrian Lopez, Aug 22nd, 2014 @ 10:27am

    Re: Color me surprised

    Anarcho-capitalism is such a lovely contradiction in terms. You have anarchy, which stands against hierarchical authority in all its forms, and capitalism, which stands for the authority of property owners over those who use their property.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  14.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 22nd, 2014 @ 10:27am

    Re:

    You are misinformed about Ayn Rand’s views on accepting government money.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  15.  
    identicon
    Dana Nutter, Aug 22nd, 2014 @ 10:28am

    Re:

    Yes, it is possible but a counterclaim must be filed. I know Tru Shibes though an online chat (by handle only) and there's a problem of having to reveal one's true identity in the counterclaim, leaving the possibility of FDR using the legal system for even more harassment. Last I heard, the options are being weighed.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  16.  
    identicon
    Dana Nutter, Aug 22nd, 2014 @ 10:36am

    Re: Opportunities

    It's one thing to call use resources like the police when someone breaks into your home, or otherwise does real physical harm, or to defend against such.

    This was clearly an attempt (which appears to be backfiring) to leverage state aggression to censor critics, and not the first one as Moly tried it before with Liberating Minds a few years ago.

    It's all very hypocritical. Unfortunately Molyneux has never handled direct criticism well. People who disagree are frequently removed from his own forums (so much for philosophical 'discussion'), however that's his own house where he's clearly free to do as he likes.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  17.  
    identicon
    gnudist, Aug 22nd, 2014 @ 10:49am

    So some guys point out his hypocrisy and he responds by engaging in more hypocrisy.

    Truly this man is an intellectual giant.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  18.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 22nd, 2014 @ 10:49am

    Re: Re: Color me surprised

    It's about non-interference in business interests by government regulation. You can have all the government you want, so long as it doesn't touch the profits. In fact, if your big government would like to purchase goods, services, or prison space, the ancaps will be happy to oblige.

    Scratch an ancap, find a randroid.

    Also, their flag is piss-yellow and black. It could be mistaken for a "For Dummies" book, which is kinda funny.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  19.  
    icon
    Chris Rhodes (profile), Aug 22nd, 2014 @ 11:00am

    Re:

    Ayn Rand was not an anarchist, and anarcho-capitalists generally have a lot of problems with her philosophy.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  20.  
    identicon
    karl schipul, Aug 22nd, 2014 @ 11:02am

    Re:

    Good point, but I don't think it is a contradiction of principles if the Social Security (which is what she actually took) was taxed from her in the first place with the promise to give them back to her later on in old age.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  21.  
    icon
    Chris Rhodes (profile), Aug 22nd, 2014 @ 11:04am

    Re: Re: Re: Color me surprised

    Anarcho-capitalism and Obectivism are two completely different things, Objectivists are minarchists (meaning they believe in small government) whereas anarchists don't believe in any government at all (by definition). To say that anarchists believe "you can have all the government you want" is incorrect, as is the assumption that we are all closet randroids.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  22.  
    icon
    Chris Rhodes (profile), Aug 22nd, 2014 @ 11:08am

    Re: Color me surprised

    Given the male-to-female ratio in the anarcho-capitalist movement, the idea of someone professing to be one in order to "get laid" is highly amusing to me. If professing extreme libertarian beliefs has ever dropped panties in the history of the world, I'm completely unaware of it. Perhaps you're thinking of anarcho-communism? :P

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  23.  
    icon
    Chris Rhodes (profile), Aug 22nd, 2014 @ 11:12am

    Re:

    He paints himself as some great philosopher, but he's such a lightweight sophist sometimes that I'm surprised so many people are so enamored with him. Every once in a while he says something that gives me a "Woah, I never thought about it like that" moment, but you have to sort through so much dreck that it's barely worth it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  24.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 22nd, 2014 @ 12:04pm

    Is this an abuse of DMCA (where he has no copyright claim) or simply a selective application of DMCA (where he has a copyright and decides to exercise the right against only one individual)? From the interview snippet, it seems this is more like the latter. This might be acting like a jerk, but wouldn't necessarily be illegal.

    Not trying to defend the guy (whom I know thing about) nor the travesty that is the DMCA; just curious.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  25.  
    icon
    weneedhelp (profile), Aug 22nd, 2014 @ 12:14pm

    Re: Opportunities

    I feel that just because you don't believe a law/rule is right, doesn't mean you shouldn't use it to your advantage when given the chance. Most would refer to this as "playing the game"
    No... thats being a hypocrite.
    -
    "Although I wouldn't have announced it on the radio."
    That would make you a dishonest hypocrite.
    -
    Its like an environmentalist going out and buying an Escalade.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  26.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 22nd, 2014 @ 12:35pm

    Re: Re: Opportunities

    Breaking news: Bears poop in the woods, pope is Catholic, people who talk about "playing the game" are scumbags. Film at 11.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  27.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 22nd, 2014 @ 12:40pm

    Re:

    "It's got nothing to do with copyright or anything like that."

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  28.  
    identicon
    TestPilotDummy, Aug 22nd, 2014 @ 12:54pm

    That'll shut em up fast.
    THE NEW WORLD ORDER'S DEMOCRACY

    the solution is get back to that
    CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC
    You know? That one the people have failed to keep lying thieving spying murdering oath breakers from stealing in the past fourteen years.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  29.  
    icon
    John Fenderson (profile), Aug 22nd, 2014 @ 12:54pm

    Re: Opportunities

    "Most would refer to this as "playing the game""

    Most who? Most people I know would call this unethical. Of course, those same people (and I) thing the phrase "playing the game" is most often used to excuse unethical behavior.

    "It's hard to complain to someone doing this"

    No, it's really not.

    "I personally feel those who don't take advantage of the rules to achieve their goals are fools"

    I personally feel that people who are willing to engage in behavior they condemn in others are corrupt.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  30.  
    icon
    John Fenderson (profile), Aug 22nd, 2014 @ 12:56pm

    Re: Re: Re: Color me surprised

    "It's about non-interference in business interests by government regulation"

    Right, which is why it's a self-contradictory phrase. You can't have a functional capitalist system without regulation, because it will always devolve to monopoly.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  31.  
    identicon
    Andyroo, Aug 22nd, 2014 @ 12:59pm

    Why

    Sad mike, i normaly support your views but this time you are going after the wrong person, yes dmca laws should not be abused but when the law is abused every day by big media then every time it is abused is another nail in it's coffin.

    If there is a bad side to this whole palava it is that the law is bad and Youtube/google is not interested in quickly resolving issues regarding big media or others abusing it.

    Up to now you have mostly been great with the content you write Mike but this time I think you slipped up a little and did not take the high road.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  32.  
    icon
    John Fenderson (profile), Aug 22nd, 2014 @ 1:00pm

    Re: Re: Color me surprised

    Oh, you misunderstand. I didn't know there was an actual movement. It's just that the only time I've heard people using the phrase seriously, it's been people trying to impress college women with how smart they are. It usually fails (it's an incredibly pretentious term), but as with all get-laid strategies, there's a percentage...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  33.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 22nd, 2014 @ 1:20pm

    Re: Re:

    It is if she received more than she paid in. Since the money was used to pay for cancer treatment, something that's notoriously expensive, it's virtually certain she did just that.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  34.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 22nd, 2014 @ 2:04pm

    Re:

    There are quotes of the guy stating he was gaming the system, so that should be enough to get him in trouble.

    But barring that, it's not even selective application, as the channel in question was obviously reporting on the content in his videos, not re-distributing en-masse. There are supposedly protections for re-using content in this way.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  35.  
    icon
    OldMugwump (profile), Aug 22nd, 2014 @ 2:05pm

    Re: Re: That one creepy dude

    They're called "professors".

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  36.  
    icon
    Nicolas (profile), Aug 22nd, 2014 @ 2:06pm

    Pragmatism

    People who identify with philosophy rather than reality? What a repugnant dichotomy. As if those who identify with the philosophy of liberty, and have risked property and life to defend it, don’t form the basis of what Techdirt usually seems to defend.

    If pragmatism is our guide, then morality has no place and we should simply try to figure out what works best, no matter who prevails or who suffers.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  37.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 22nd, 2014 @ 2:09pm

    I thought the concept around Black and White was pretty neat. I tended to beat my monkey a little more than I should have.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  38.  
    icon
    OldMugwump (profile), Aug 22nd, 2014 @ 2:10pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Color me surprised

    You can't have a functional capitalist system without the rule of law (contracts enforceable in court, prohibition on settling disputes by violence, etc.).

    But "regulation" (in the sense of special rules applicable only to business), no.

    There are very few natural monopolies - most of the "classic" types turn out not to be naturally monopolistic in the medium term.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  39.  
    icon
    James Jensen (profile), Aug 22nd, 2014 @ 2:11pm

    Re: Opportunities

    I disagree. Licensing work under a copyleft license when you disagree with IP entirely is playing the game: it's a defensive maneuver, using the system against itself.

    What Molyneux did went beyond legitimate defense. It's more like someone against drug laws turning in a neighbor for smoking pot because they keep throwing trash on his lawn. There are more appropriate ways of handling the situation than abusing an already-unjust law.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  40.  
    icon
    OldMugwump (profile), Aug 22nd, 2014 @ 2:14pm

    Re: Re: Re: Color me surprised

    Go attend a Ron Paul rally.

    You'll be surprised - it is not 1985 any more.

    I think the proportion of pretty young women involved in any political movement is a leading indicator of its popularity.

    We've arrived at a "libertarian moment". I don't know how long it'll last, or how far it'll go.

    But there is something new going on.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  41.  
    icon
    James Jensen (profile), Aug 22nd, 2014 @ 2:19pm

    Re: Pragmatism

    If pragmatism is our guide, then morality has no place and we should simply try to figure out what works best, no matter who prevails or who suffers.

    Because morality is better than what's best?

    What a repugnant, self-righteous dichotomy.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  42.  
    icon
    Nicolas (profile), Aug 22nd, 2014 @ 2:36pm

    Re: Re: Pragmatism

    Sure, morality of the positive sort is better than what’s best if the latter is immoral. You might have a pragmatic interest in stealing my car -- it might see it as best for you to have transportation -- but if one is guided by morality it is not defensible to do so. You got a problem with that?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  43.  
    icon
    Karl (profile), Aug 22nd, 2014 @ 3:53pm

    Re:

    Did Molyneux actually file a DMCA takedown or use one of the many other ways Youtube has to screw people over?

    You should watch the embedded video. About midway through, the video narrator makes the point that Molyneux could easily have filed an abuse report to YouTube. But he didn't do that, and used the DMCA instead.

    It could be that he was just confused. It's just as likely that he figured he couldn't file bogus abuse reports as easy as bogus DMCA reports. After all, the anti-abuse policy is YouTube's internal policy, so truly bogus reports can be ignored. The DMCA is enforced by law (what he would call "state violence"), so YouTube can't easily afford to ignore bogus DMCA claims.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  44.  
    icon
    Chris Rhodes (profile), Aug 22nd, 2014 @ 4:00pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Color me surprised

    you can't have a functional capitalist system without regulation, because it will always devolve to monopoly.
    Funny, because I'm of the opposite opinion. You can't have a functional capitalist system with regulation, because it will always devolve to monopoly.

    Government interference in the market exists primarily to create monopolies and cartels. Often times, they are even explicit about that fact.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  45.  
    icon
    Chris Rhodes (profile), Aug 22nd, 2014 @ 4:05pm

    Re: Re: Re: Color me surprised

    Oh, you misunderstand. I didn't know there was an actual movement.
    The modern movement of what I would consider anarcho-capitalism has probably only really become a thing in the last 50 years or so (to coincide with Rothbard's writings in the area). I'm surprised you haven't met any online, though. We tend to be the target of a lot of vitriol.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  46.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 22nd, 2014 @ 4:14pm

    Stefan Molyneux is a creepy, narcissistic wannabe cult leader.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  47.  
    identicon
    Greg Gauthier, Aug 22nd, 2014 @ 5:31pm

    Trolls are the real hypocrites

    Look, the only hypocrisy here is with the trolls. People who do personal conversations on his show are taking a huge personal risk to be that vulnerable in public.

    The political system under which we live offers someone no choice in a situation of self-defense or even just dispute resolution, OTHER than the only thing it can offer: which is the threat of violence.

    Trolls are the ones exploiting this fact, and the vulnerability of Stef's callers, in order to push him into a position to have to use it. So that they can later cry 'hypocrisy!'

    Fuck those assholes, and fuck you for taking them seriously.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  48.  
    icon
    Mike Masnick (profile), Aug 22nd, 2014 @ 5:38pm

    Re: Why

    Sad mike, i normaly support your views but this time you are going after the wrong person, yes dmca laws should not be abused but when the law is abused every day by big media then every time it is abused is another nail in it's coffin.

    So, because it's regularly abused, we should be okay with it being abused again?

    Up to now you have mostly been great with the content you write Mike but this time I think you slipped up a little and did not take the high road.

    What, exactly, is "the high road" here?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  49.  
    icon
    Mike Masnick (profile), Aug 22nd, 2014 @ 5:41pm

    Re: Pragmatism

    People who identify with philosophy rather than reality? What a repugnant dichotomy. As if those who identify with the philosophy of liberty, and have risked property and life to defend it, don’t form the basis of what Techdirt usually seems to defend.

    I believe you are reading too much into the sentence. My issue is with people who define themselves by philosophy.

    I'm all for people having a set of rules and morals to live by, but I think it's a personal thing. My general problem is when people identify themselves as *part of a named philosophy* they tend to be rather cultlike and antagonistic towards other opinions.

    I have a personal moral code and rules by which I live, but I don't name it nor identify with any particular group.

    It may be a personal bias, but I find those who so closely identify with certain groups to be insufferable.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  50.  
    icon
    Rosey Ribbles (profile), Aug 22nd, 2014 @ 6:01pm

    Re: Trolls are the real hypocrites

    Fuck you for trying to pawn Stefbot's responsibility for using state violence on "trolls."

    Tru Shibes wasn't a troll, they exposed contradictions in Stefbot's ideas and changing bios. You're the one exploiting false narratives to exempt Stefbot from moral responsibility for his decision to use force.

    If "trolls" were a problem, he could have use Youtube's procedures deal with it. Quit being a coward and justifying Stefbot's use of the gun he claims to despise.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  51.  
    identicon
    Lawrence D’Oliveiro, Aug 22nd, 2014 @ 8:13pm

    Re: But "regulation" (in the sense of special rules applicable only to business), no.

    Consider how the stock market is naturally prone to boom-bust cycles: only Government regulation can do anything about that.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  52.  
    identicon
    Jason Maher, Aug 22nd, 2014 @ 10:03pm

    Business cycles

    If state intervention in the market ("regulation") is designed to combat business cycles, then any reasonable assessment of its effectiveness could only conclude that it has been an abject failure. Of course, the reality is that the cycle of boom and bust is actually caused by state intervention in the first place. The cruel joke is that every time the state's interference blows up in its face (and everyone else's), it responds by interfering all the more, sowing the seeds for he next bust.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  53.  
    icon
    nasch (profile), Aug 23rd, 2014 @ 8:27am

    Re: Opportunities

    I feel that just because you don't believe a law/rule is right, doesn't mean you shouldn't use it to your advantage when given the chance.... I personally feel those who don't take advantage of the rules to achieve their goals are fools.

    Sounds like you have no moral compass.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  54.  
    icon
    nasch (profile), Aug 23rd, 2014 @ 8:29am

    Re: Re: Re: Color me surprised

    You can have all the government you want, so long as it doesn't touch the profits.

    That sounds very similar to the system we have now...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  55.  
    icon
    nasch (profile), Aug 23rd, 2014 @ 9:01am

    Re: Trolls are the real hypocrites

    Look, the only hypocrisy here is with the trolls.

    So Molyneaux is a troll, or simultaneously employing and condemning state power is not hypocrisy?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  56.  
    icon
    nasch (profile), Aug 23rd, 2014 @ 9:03am

    Re: Business cycles

    The cruel joke is that every time the state's interference blows up in its face (and everyone else's), it responds by interfering all the more, sowing the seeds for he next bust.

    That's because for some reason governments insist on procyclical policies (austerity during recession, spending during expansion) rather than countercyclical (the opposite). It makes no sense.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  57.  
    identicon
    Damon, Aug 23rd, 2014 @ 9:26am

    TruShibes has been Doxxed

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  58.  
    icon
    OldMugwump (profile), Aug 23rd, 2014 @ 9:31am

    Re: Re: But "regulation" (in the sense of special rules applicable only to business), no.

    Like...where, for example?

    I see no evidence that governments can do anything about that.

    Other, perhaps, than shutting down capital markets altogether. (See, for example, the history of the Soviet Union...)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  59.  
    identicon
    Sky, Aug 23rd, 2014 @ 11:47am

    Lost me

    You lost me here "I tend to find people who identify too much with philosophies, rather than realities, a bit tiresome." - isn't philosophy the study of reality? Dood, that's just dumb

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  60.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 23rd, 2014 @ 11:53am

    Re: Re: Color me surprised

    Uhh what? Capitalism is the free exchange of goods and services silly! Anarchy comes from Greek an-archo or "no-rulers" - it's really easy to spot the state schooled folks on here...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  61.  
    icon
    MrTroy (profile), Aug 24th, 2014 @ 7:10pm

    It does seem odd for someone who claims to be an anarchist and against "state violence" to then use copyright law to take down critical videos.
    I don't know, if I thought a law was stupid and could be abused, then demonstrating how the law can be abused seems like a valid point to make.

    I may be being too generous though, I have no interest in the parties involved.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  62.  
    identicon
    Pasta Art, Aug 25th, 2014 @ 3:45am

    Who's the aggressor?

    If someone steals the privacy of your callers and uses that information online, is that not a violation of the non-aggression principle? If the state holds a monopoly on force, and takes your money, what options do you really have to address the violation of the non-aggression principle? SM chose to use the only method of force available to him via state IP laws, even though he does not really believe in those laws.

    The confusion is similar to when Ron Paul took Social Security payments. Paul does not believe in Social Security, but since the government is already taking his money, there's no sense in not using the system. After all, you don't really have a choice.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  63.  
    icon
    John Fenderson (profile), Aug 25th, 2014 @ 8:40am

    Re: Re: Re: Color me surprised

    "Capitalism is the free exchange of goods and services silly!"

    No, it's not. Capitalism is an economic system where trade and industry are controlled by private owners rather than the state. You can absolutely have a capitalist system without a free market (there are numerous examples in the US).

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  64.  
    icon
    John Fenderson (profile), Aug 25th, 2014 @ 8:41am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Color me surprised

    "I'm surprised you haven't met any online, though."

    Maybe I have, I don't know. I only know (as I said) that I have never before heard the term used in a serious manner.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  65.  
    icon
    John Fenderson (profile), Aug 25th, 2014 @ 10:13am

    Re: Who's the aggressor?

    "The confusion is similar to when Ron Paul took Social Security payments."

    That's not at all similar. Social Security is simply getting back the money you put in. It's more similar to a retirement account. The money Ron Paul received was his money being returned to him.

    In contrast, using the DMCA when you oppose copyright is pure hypocrisy. He isn't getting back anything he put in. It's more like if someone is opposed to guns goes out and uses a gun.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  66.  
    icon
    OldMugwump (profile), Aug 26th, 2014 @ 9:40am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Color me surprised

    Ah, the problem with terminology.

    How much political discourse boils down to differing interpretation of words?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  67.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 20th, 2014 @ 5:55pm

    Re: Re: Pragmatism

    Queue the philosophical Debate!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  68.  
    identicon
    Raven, Oct 26th, 2014 @ 6:47am

    Molyneux - DMCA - Tru Shibes

    Raven (Tru Shibes) v. Molyneux et al.

    Just to let you know, my case was filed Friday in the Federal District Court for the Central District of California - case number 2:14-cv-8288

    here is the Complaint:
    https://app.box.com/s/vny50dtkbrj9ptaufj4a


    Raven

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  69.  
    identicon
    Lloyd Voluntaryist, Oct 26th, 2014 @ 6:56am

    Substance or Speculation?

    After all the juicy gossip/backstory is provided, this is the entire substance of the article:

    "from everything that people have been presenting online in various forums, it seems pretty clear that TruShibe was not doing that, but was merely critical of Molyneux."

    That's not an argument.

    "It seems" isn't even a statement of fact. This is a statement of persuasive sophistry.

    Is X the case? Yes? Substantiate the claim.
    Is X the case? Are you not sure? Step away from your keyboard and do further research, motherfucker.

    This is the manner in which Mike Masnick's expensive Cornell University prepared him to engage ideas.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  70.  
    icon
    Mike Masnick (profile), Oct 26th, 2014 @ 7:41am

    Re: Substance or Speculation?

    Sophistry is actually taking a single word out of context and saying that the entire argument depends on that one word.

    Note: no one else seems to think that's the important word here. Because it's not.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  71.  
    icon
    nasch (profile), Oct 26th, 2014 @ 4:48pm

    Re: Substance or Speculation?

    Mike even pointed out the key point of the story: "The key point, however, is that a guy working for Molyneux's "Free Domain Radio," named Michael DeMarco, has admitted that he issued the DMCA notices on behalf of Free Domain Radio not because of any legitimate copyright reasons, but because he claims that some of the people who had called in to Molyneux's talk show had been harassed."

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
Advertisement
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Support Techdirt - Get Great Stuff!

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.