by Mike Masnick
Fri, Sep 16th 2011 5:28am
AC alerts us to a change in the new Sony PlayStation Network terms of service that basically says that you agree not to sue the company. Honestly (and Sony pointed this out in its defense), such clauses are pretty common. It is debatable how enforceable some of these clauses are, but they say that you have to go to arbitration, rather than sue. The terms also bar participating in class action lawsuits, which seems much more questionable. Where Sony gets ridiculous is in claiming that this change "is designed to benefit both the consumer and the company by ensuring that there is adequate time and procedures to resolve disputes." That makes me think of a two syllable word whose first four letters are bull. Come on. At this point, everyone knows that binding arbitration between a company and a consumer wildly favors companies. A study from a few years back found that companies win in arbitration against consumers 95% of the time. Sony knows this. So its move is not about protecting consumers at all, and it's insulting for it to imply that it is.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Game Developer Rewards 100 Users For Actually Reading The EULA
- The Judicial System May Be Bad, But The Privatized Judicial System Of Arbitration Is Worse
- Stop Freaking Out About Snapchat's Terms Of Service; You Read It Wrong
- Court Rules Gran Turismo Protected By 1st Amendment In Including Company Logos For Realism
- Sony Pictures, Which Hyped Up 'Harm' Of Hack, Now Tells Court No Harm Done To Employees