by Mike Masnick
Wed, Mar 16th 2011 3:00am
We recently wrote about an attempt by one of the growing number of mass P2P pre-settlement lawsuit lawyers, John Steele, to file a reverse of defendant class action lawsuit to try to get around the issue of misjoinder in combining a bunch of totally unrelated individuals in a single lawsuit. Typically, of course, class action lawsuits involve a class as the "plaintiff" not the defendant. It's not unheard of to have a defendant class action, but it is rare. Either way, the judge doesn't seem to be buying it. In a recent hearing the judge noted that the whole thing felt like a fishing expedition, and barred the court from issuing any subpoenas until an adversarial hearing was held. It's unclear who will represent the still anonymous "class," but hopefully the judge takes a note from another court and brings in experts like Public Citizen and the EFF.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Prenda's John Steele Pleads Guilty, Admits To Basically Everything
- Vizio Fails To Dodge Class Action Over Its Spying 'Smart' Televisions
- First Look At UK Piracy Alert System: Mostly Benign, Except ISPs Are Requesting Filesharing Software Be Removed By Clients
- Judge Nixes PS3 Linux Class Action Settlement As Class's Lawyers Victimize The Class A Second Time
- Barrett Brown's Donors Sue DOJ/FBI For Monitoring Their Donations