Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • icon
    DH's Love Child (profile), 25 Feb 2011 @ 6:38pm

    So true

    And yet, the usual trolls will try to claim that's only in response to the freetards.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      ChurchHatesTucker (profile), 25 Feb 2011 @ 7:06pm

      Re: So true

      Won't somebody think of the lawyers?

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Poster, 25 Feb 2011 @ 7:11pm

        Re: Re: So true

        ...well, I would, but the thoughts wouldn't be very nice.

        Or non-exculpatory.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • icon
          Christopher (profile), 26 Feb 2011 @ 1:33am

          Re: Re: Re: So true

          Why wouldn't your thoughts be very nice? The fact is that EVERYONE bashes on lawyers until they need one..... frankly, if I was a lawyer and not just a paralegal, having someone come to me who had an avowed attitude like yours? Even if they were Ghandi, I would tell them "Sorry, find someone else to take your case!"

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • icon
            Richard (profile), 26 Feb 2011 @ 4:09am

            Re: Re: Re: Re: So true

            Of course there are good and bad in every profession. There are many great lawyers out there - eg Clive Stafford-Smith, Lawrence Lessig etc etc. Here we tend to use "Lawyers" as a shorthand for a certain type of lawyer.

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • icon
            someone (profile), 26 Feb 2011 @ 6:21am

            Re: Re: Re: Re: So true

            Even if they were Ghandi, I would tell them "Sorry, find someone else to take your case!"

            Someone realizes they need help from a professional the professionals response is to not help them.
            Yet another reason to dislike lawyers and/or wanabe lawyers.

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            Anonymous Coward, 26 Feb 2011 @ 11:31am

            Re: Re: Re: Re: So true

            We shall see. If I ever need a lawyer, i still fully expect to bash on them. Not bashing on the lawyer to his face is just a common sense and common courtesy, not a betrayal of one's own original principals. Nothing wrong with turning the tables on your enemy by becoming him as long as you revert to normal afterwards.

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            Chris, 26 Feb 2011 @ 3:07pm

            Re: Re: Re: Re: So true

            And that is the problem with all this... Some lawyers would even turn down Ghandi if it meant they wouldn't be able to squeeze as much money as they could by taking cases that had less moral footing and higher profit margins. Some people need to start feeding the NEEDS of their soul over the DESIRES of their greedy bank accounts.

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            Anonymous Coward, 26 Feb 2011 @ 4:00pm

            Re: Re: Re: Re: So true

            "The fact is that EVERYONE bashes on lawyers until they need one"

            and we wouldn't need a lawyer if it weren't for the other lawyers suing us for frivolous reasons.

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • icon
            Richard (profile), 26 Feb 2011 @ 4:23pm

            Re: Re: Re: Re: So true

            Even if they were Ghandi, I would tell them "Sorry, find someone else to take your case!"

            In case you didn't know - Gandi was a lawyer himself...

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            Anonymous Coward, 27 Feb 2011 @ 6:16am

            Re: Re: Re: Re: So true

            The fact is that EVERYONE bashes on lawyers until they need one.....

            And the more lawyers you have, the more you need.

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            Anonymous Coward, 27 Feb 2011 @ 8:15pm

            Re: Re: Re: Re: So true

            Look dude, this lawyer bashing thing didn't started today, medieval kings(mostly the French and English for some reason) where berating that profession long before you were born.

            Besides what people see is not pretty. I saw a criminal lawyer once get a call from one of his clients telling him to go to a supermarket and wait 2 blocks away because they were going to rob the place and if they got caught they wanted him to be there, f'ing unbelievable, and he did, why?

            Because he needed the money, he had 2 children and a wife that needed things and he did all of that for them, he was a loving father and husband a good guy in his neighborhood and never sued no one, contrary to some other lawyers I knew that sued everyone that annoyed them just because they could, so even though one was doing some disgusting things to survive other were doing it just because they could, but you wouldn't know that from the outside.

            Lawyer bashing is a occupational hazard, get over it.

            Quotes:
            "The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers."
            William Shakespeare, King Henry VI Quote (Act IV, Scene II)

            "A countryman between two lawyers is like a fish between two cats."
            Benjamin Franklin

            "Lawyers are men who hire out their words and anger."
            Horace

            "If the present Congress errs in too much talking, how can it be otherwise in a body to which the people send one hundred and fifty lawyers, whose trade it is to question everything, yield nothing, and talk by the hour?"
            Thomas Jefferson

            “Never forget that everything Hitler did in Germany was legal.”
            Martin Luther King, Jr. quotes

            “Lawyers, I suppose, were children once.”
            Charles Lamb

            "It is a maxim among these lawyers, that whatever hath been done before, may legally be done again: and therefore they take special care to record all the decisions formerly made against common justice and the general reason of mankind."
            Jonathan Swift

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            Not an electronic Rodent, 28 Feb 2011 @ 3:34am

            Re: Re: Re: Re: So true

            The fact is that EVERYONE bashes on lawyers until they need one.....
            Every time I've needed one it's made me want to bash on them more. A lawyer in my experience has never ever made things better even when the outcome was "good" for me.

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        xenomancer (profile), 25 Feb 2011 @ 9:58pm

        Re: Re: So true

        The lawyers already own the rights to those thoughts. My incentive to independently create those thoughts is being hindered by their haughty sense of entitlement!

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Bas Grasmayer (profile), 25 Feb 2011 @ 6:54pm

    Nice one, Nina!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Poster, 25 Feb 2011 @ 7:00pm

    Absolutely perfect.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 25 Feb 2011 @ 7:34pm

    Nina, without violations, there would be no lawsuits.

    Cause and effect. Perhaps something you should focus on?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      IronM@sk, 25 Feb 2011 @ 8:07pm

      Re:

      LOL!

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 25 Feb 2011 @ 8:31pm

      Re:

      http://www.boingboing.net/2011/02/25/tolkien-estate-censo.html

      Tolkien estate censors badge that contains the word "Tolkien"

      Until today, when Zazzle emailed me to say they were pulling the buttons for intellectual property right infringement.

      And guess who complained about their rights being infringed?

      Without any proper IP reform, expect the "violations" to keep getting more and more ridiculous.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 25 Feb 2011 @ 8:55pm

      Re:

      Right. It's the defendants and their misdeeds that bring about lawsuits, not the plaintiffs.

      In a way that I'm sure she didn't intend, Nina is right. Copyright incentivizes the creation of works that are so good, other people will "steal" them. This "theft" creates lawsuits.

      Therefore, copyright is an incentive to create lawsuits--lawsuits that the defendants bring on themselves.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        cc (profile), 25 Feb 2011 @ 9:11pm

        Re: Re:

        "Copyright incentivizes the creation of works that are so good"

        Is there evidence of that, or is that what they told you at IP jihad training?

        Plus, copyright is just a law. You could make a law that makes breathing illegal and sue everyone for "stealing" air. That would be one hell of an incentive for lawsuits -- it would surely keep the hot-air lawyers busy and their wallets heavy.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • icon
          Chris Rhodes (profile), 28 Feb 2011 @ 7:20am

          Re: Re: Re:

          IP jihad training

          Perfect! I had a good laugh at that one.

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            Not an electronic Rodent, 28 Feb 2011 @ 8:19am

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            IP jihad training

            Perfect! I had a good laugh at that one.
            It did conjure an image of a guy in an expensive though slighly oversized and bulging suit shouting "COCIAu Akbar" before exploding into a huge cloud of takedown notices and subpoenas in the middle of a large Sony shop.....

            Um... just me then? Ah, well....

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 25 Feb 2011 @ 11:00pm

        Re: Re:

        To the extent that copy'right' works are better than other works, it's only because the funding to create such works (wrongfully) heavily benefits from government imposed monopoly access to public airwaves and cableco infrastructure (and a better ability to advertise through these channels). Others have to go through a govt imposed gateway keeper to get their works advertised and played on cableco infrastructure and broadcasting spectra and those who control the use of these communication platforms are more prone to play (and advertise) works that are controlled or 'owned' by a select few. Hence the works of these select few naturally get a wider audience and this wider audience leads to better funding of better content.

        but, as we can see, freely available content is being produced every day on the Internet, and the quality of much of this content improves every day, as others are getting a better opportunity to get their works known and to utilize such publicity to acquire more funding.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 26 Feb 2011 @ 9:41am

        Re: Re:

        "Copyright incentivizes the creation of works that are so good, other people will "steal" them."

        I have a few copyrighted works and I can assure you that they are complete crap. I can also assure you that copyright was no incentive at all to create them - the only incentive emerging from those copyrights is that I could sue someone for infringing upon them. In other words: I know I couldn't sell them, since they're crap, but woe betide the fool who uses them to make something new, different, and better. Ka-ching for me and my lawyer.

        Copyright is automatically created when a work is fixed in a tangible form. Quality of that work does not enter into the equation in any way, shape or fixed and tangible form.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 26 Feb 2011 @ 2:15am

      Re:

      Nina, without violations, there would be no lawsuits.
      Cause and effect. Perhaps something you should focus on?


      So, you're saying that every copyright lawsuit has merit? That sounds exactly like the kind of lie copyright supporters like to tell.

      Abolish copyright.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Richard (profile), 26 Feb 2011 @ 4:10am

      Re:

      without violations, there would be no lawsuits

      You don't seriously believe that do you?

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      MrWilson, 26 Feb 2011 @ 10:56am

      Re:

      Without copyright laws, there would be no violations.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 25 Feb 2011 @ 7:45pm

    That one is a LuLz winner.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    charliebrown (profile), 25 Feb 2011 @ 7:49pm

    From the 'nuff said dpt (external division)

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA*breath*HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA*breath*HAHAHAHAHAHAHA*breath*HAHAHAHAHA *breath*HAHAHA*breath*HAHAHA*breath*HAHA*breath*HAHAHA*breathes*HAHA-oh-oh dear.... HAHAHAHAHA!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    cc (profile), 25 Feb 2011 @ 7:52pm

    Spot on.

    Has anyone else noticed that the most aggressive critics here on TechDirt are not in fact artists, but IP lawyers...

    The artists we get, some of whom are actually regulars like Nina and Karl, are a lot less dogmatic about IP enforcement.

    I find that rather telling about who is more concerned about their future employment when IP policy is fixed.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 25 Feb 2011 @ 8:57pm

      Re:

      LOL! Very true, but they're the biggest critics because they're the ones trained to see through the FUD. :)

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        cc (profile), 25 Feb 2011 @ 9:18pm

        Re: Re:

        So, you consider the artists themselves too pathetic, stupid and incompetent that they can't respond for themselves.

        Moreover, you seem more keen to discuss matters of economic policy (such as the motives behind copyrights and patents) rather than technicalities about the current state of the law that your training covered.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        Richard (profile), 26 Feb 2011 @ 4:13am

        Re: Re:

        they're the biggest critics because they're the ones trained to see through the FUD. :)
        Actually they're trained to create FUD.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Not an electronic Rodent, 28 Feb 2011 @ 3:30am

        Re: Re:

        Can't.... click... funny... enough.. for.. laughing..... lawyers.... objective.... perceptive.... trained... hah hahahahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahahahhahahahahah (thud)

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Zacqary Adam Green (profile), 25 Feb 2011 @ 10:54pm

    But copyright gave you the incentive to create that comic, right? RIGHT?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Tfp, 26 Feb 2011 @ 3:54am

    Copyright is

    Copyright is theft

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Loonesta, 26 Feb 2011 @ 6:37am

    Sour Grapes

    IF you have never created anything of value, yes, it is an invitation to litigation.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    RagingBid (profile), 26 Feb 2011 @ 8:23am

    U.S. Copyright Office web quote

    Here is a quote directly from the us copyright office website:

    "The Office's mission is: To promote creativity by administering and sustaining an effective national copyright system."

    What I have always found interesting is the people who look of un copyrighted works and register copyrights for which they never created!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    BlackDrak, 26 Feb 2011 @ 10:32am

    So....

    Mind if I submit this creative work to other news orgs? ROFL!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      MrWilson, 26 Feb 2011 @ 11:00am

      Re: So....

      No, Nina doesn't mind at all.

      You should read the notice in lieu of a copyright notice on her site:

      ♡ 2011 Mimi and Eunice. Copying is an act of love. Please copy and share.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Shadojak (profile), 26 Feb 2011 @ 4:26pm

    Hmmm, apparently

    all the AC commenters on TD are IP Lawyers.

    Ones worried that one day, they will have to look for work, lol.

    My heart bleeds for them!

    /sarc/

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 26 Feb 2011 @ 7:37pm

    Apparently, copyright was incentive to create this cartoon.

    Nina, you fail on so many levels.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Hiiragi Kagami (profile), 28 Feb 2011 @ 3:25am

    :)

    Usually, I've an issue with Nina's comics but this one stands to be her best. It's on point and 100% accurate.

    Now, let's share these with politicians anxious to sign in COICA with links of the "effectiveness" of the DMCA.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 28 Feb 2011 @ 6:35am

    Nina defintely hit a nerve with this one! Someone can't take a joke lol. Probably too close to the truth then, eh? Though so.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Special Affiliate Offer

Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.