Arianna Huffington Sued For 'Stealing' The Idea For The Huffington Post

from the you-can't-steal-ideas dept

Apparently two political consultants, Peter Daou and James Boyce, thought they had a deal back in 2004 to help create a blogging site with Arianna Huffington and Ken Lerer -- and they're now suing both of them for "idea misappropriation" over the Huffington Post. The whole filing is quite a read:
Of course, you can't own an idea, so it's a bit silly to claim otherwise. There's also a breach of contract claim, which also seems like a huge stretch. While it is possible to have a verbal contract, from the filings, it's going to be very difficult for Daou and Boyce to prove that there was any official verbal contract at work here. It sounded like early stages of planning, before Huffington and Lerer decided to go in their own direction.

Also quite damning is the fact that the lawsuit is being filed more than 5 years after the events took place. Daou and Boyce try to explain this away by claiming that a public legal fight would hurt their ability to get other work, which doesn't really make much sense. On top of that Daou and Boyce have been regular contributors to The Huffington Post. In the lawsuit, they suggest that they still wanted it to be a success and hoped that Huffington and Lerer would make things right. It's difficult to see this court case getting very far, but it may scare people off from having any conversations with Daou or Boyce about potentially working together on any kind of project, as it seems they might sue you in the future if you don't automatically cut them in on it if you decide to go off and do it on your own.

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • icon
    ChurchHatesTucker (profile), 16 Nov 2010 @ 11:54am

    Oh gods

    I had this idea in '94.

    Oh wait, everybody else on the net at the time did too.

    If it wasn't for these buggers who up and done it, WE'D have done it. Probably. At some point.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Scote, 16 Nov 2010 @ 12:10pm

    You mean "oral" contract

    You wrote:

    "prove that there was any official verbal contract at work here. "

    Any contract that uses words is verbal. Both oral and written contracts are verbal. An oral contract is one that is spoken rather than written down.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 16 Nov 2010 @ 12:57pm

    Were these two whores recently laid off?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Dewey, Cheatem & Howe, 16 Nov 2010 @ 12:58pm

    And to think Daou and Boyce thought bringing way back when would be career-limiting... it's far more career-limiting to play nice in the intervening 5 years and THEN file suit. Whatta couple dopes.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 16 Nov 2010 @ 1:04pm

    Assuming the facts as related in the complaint are true (at this point in the proceedings the facts are presumed to be true), these two individuals present a quite compelling case that may proceed to trial on all counts in the absence of any relevant statute of limitations.

    As for "idea", your article is remiss in not noting that the work allegedly done by the two plaintiffs was far, far more advanced than you appear prepared to give credit.

    BTW, verbal contracts are just fine (Statute of Frauds does not apply here) for the formation of a Joint Venture, and breach of a fiduciary duty, as is owed by each joint venturer to the others, is a serious matter.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    interval (profile), 16 Nov 2010 @ 1:14pm

    Good

    I'm glad Huffington is being sued for something, even if the merits of the case arn't exactly up to snuff. The damn, lie-spewing witch needs to be brought down a peg or two by any means.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      harbingerofdoom (profile), 16 Nov 2010 @ 4:09pm

      Re: Good

      nice.
      ends justify the means? if you dont like it, dont read it. if you believe it to be lies, start your own site in order to offer proof that its all lies.

      quite honestly, the idea of "i hate them so bring them down by any means possible" is bottom of the barrel thinking and every bit as underhanded as what RIAA, MPAA, et al. do... you really want to be thought of in the same light as them?

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Nobody you know, 24 Nov 2010 @ 5:40am

      Re: Good

      You just don't like the fact that someone is standing up to the Republicanazis who own America and control most of the news outlets so they can hide their crimes. Good for Arianna.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    James Carmichael (profile), 16 Nov 2010 @ 1:21pm

    Grammar Nazi

    more then 5 years -> more than 5 years

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    bob, 16 Nov 2010 @ 1:48pm

    I can't say I blame him

    All I know is that being married to her turns you gay, or in other words her x would rather be gay than married to her.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    elliot, 16 Nov 2010 @ 7:02pm

    Daou and Boyce

    I guess these guys watched THE SOCIAL NETWORK, and decided to sue. Zuckerburg gets sued (and won) by 2 guys who came up with the original idea and hired zuckerburg.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Gene Cavanaugh, 17 Nov 2010 @ 7:56pm

    Huffington Post suit

    I am probably a little out of date, but there are several things to consider here:
    1. Under the Statute of Frauds, a contract covering more than a year must be in writing. I didn't see that; but IMO a verbal contract is a nullity in this case.
    2. In every state I am aware of, a suit for such a thing needed to be brought within 2-4 years, even if in writing, otherwise, the Statute of Limitations likely applies.
    3. An attorney, in every state I am aware of, would need to explain this to a client - of course, if the client decides to proceed anyway, it gets murky - and we need to know "Which state"?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 10 Feb 2011 @ 4:45pm

    people steal more than you think

    I'm not saying yes or no. I'm saying there are some bastards out there that have been known to do such things. And there are other bastards who have been known to steal for no reason. Do enough business long enough, you'll discover this.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 10 Feb 2011 @ 7:03pm

    send the bitch to egypt

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 3 Oct 2012 @ 2:33pm

    Funny, August 2004 there was a double homicide in Jenner where JOURNAL FIVE entry has characteristics of Arianna's handwriting when magnified. There was a Move for Spiritual Awareness Minister in the Northern CA region at that Aug 04 time (Mary Melissa Kline) and I wonder, is there a problem with that? could that couple have seen something? a meeting of million dollar minds? only running a theory here.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Insider Shop - Show Your Support!

Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.