by Mike Masnick
Thu, Oct 28th 2010 8:34am
In another win for free speech rights over an overly aggressive gov't attempt to censor, a federal judge issued an injunction barring a Massacusetts law that tried to ban certain works from the internet for being "harmful to minors." The judge noted that since the law did not require that the works be "purposefully sent to a person the sender knew to be a minor," it went way too far. There have certainly been a lot of attempts by governments to legislate parts of the First Amendment away, and it's nice to see the courts still believe strongly in protecting at least that Amendment.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Judge Changes Mind, Says James Woods Can Likely Unmask Guy Who Made Fun Of Him On Twitter
- Government Lawyers Think Open Records Reform Proposal Hands Over Too Much Power To The People
- Judge Blocks Release Of Anti-Abortion Videos As The Arbiter Of Journalism
- Appeals Court Tells City It Can't Use Its Terribly-Written Zoning Laws To Censor Speech
- Moral Panics: Twitter Feels Compelled To Tell You It's Deleted Over 125,000 Terrorist Twitter Accounts