by Mike Masnick
Wed, Mar 31st 2010 8:27pm
I'd been avoiding writing about the Newzbin case, because, honestly, I didn't have much to say about it -- but people keep submitting it, so here's a very quick post. Newzbin, one of a bunch of Usenet aggregators, was found liable for copyright infringement of its users in a UK court. The ruling doesn't appear all that different from similar rulings elsewhere, with courts focusing on staff actively promoting the infringing nature of content on the site. In this case, it told site "editors" to promote works that were almost certainly infringing. Whether or not this makes sense in the larger picture, the message is clear: if you actively promote infringing activities, courts are not going to look kindly on your activities, even if the actual infringement is done by users. This trend has been clear for quite some time, and I'm still confused why any site would encourage its users to infringe these days. It's just asking for a legal beatdown.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Copyright Troll Perfect 10 Loses Once Again, Setting More Good Precedents For Copyright Law
- New Encrypted Email Services Coming From Kim Dotcom's Mega And Newzbin
- Newzbin Lawyer Struck Off For Posting Insulting Tweets During Case -- & Failing To Declare He Owned The Company He Defended
- Entertainment Industry Gets Another Usenet Provider To Shut Down: Is Usenet Illegal?
- Usenet Provider Ordered To Wave Magic Wand And Make Infringing Content Disappear