by Mike Masnick
Mon, Jan 18th 2010 8:01pm
We've spent plenty of time discussing the importance of Section 230 in properly applying liability, and avoiding situations where angry individuals or organizations sue a third party service provider because they have deeper pockets and are easier to sue. However, most countries don't have similar safe harbors (or, if they do, they tend to be much more limited). This is really unfortunate and can lead to significant chilling effects. Over in the UK, it looks like they've just updated e-commerce regulations to carve out a safe harbor for ISPs... but only related to hate speech. But it makes me wonder why carve out a special exemption for hate speech, and why not set up full safe harbors that say a service provider should not be blamed for the actions of a user?
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- UK Drug Dogs Finding Way More Sausage And Cheese Than Actual Drugs
- UK Trademark Battle Over The Number 3
- Menace To Tax Dodgers David Cameron Has His Own Tax Dodging Exposed By The Panama Leaks
- UK Police Flagging Uncharged Arrestees As Possible National Security Threats To Keep Their Biometric Data From Being Deleted
- Head Of British Rights Group: Piracy Is Google's Fault Even If It's Not Actually Google's Fault