Legal Issues

by Mike Masnick


Filed Under:
hate speech, safe harbors, uk



UK ISPs Get Tiny Safe Harbor For Hate Speech... Why Not Full Safe Harbors?

from the step-it-up dept

We've spent plenty of time discussing the importance of Section 230 in properly applying liability, and avoiding situations where angry individuals or organizations sue a third party service provider because they have deeper pockets and are easier to sue. However, most countries don't have similar safe harbors (or, if they do, they tend to be much more limited). This is really unfortunate and can lead to significant chilling effects. Over in the UK, it looks like they've just updated e-commerce regulations to carve out a safe harbor for ISPs... but only related to hate speech. But it makes me wonder why carve out a special exemption for hate speech, and why not set up full safe harbors that say a service provider should not be blamed for the actions of a user?

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    im a sue you, 18 Jan 2010 @ 8:32pm

    look out road builders

    you aid and abet all kinds a crime

    thefts
    drunk driving
    drug smuggling
    murders
    rapes
    child porn and kidnappings

    WE SHOULD SUE MAKERS OF ROADS BIG TIME LOOK WHAT WE COULD STOP
    THINK OF THE CHILDREN

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    im a sue you, 18 Jan 2010 @ 8:43pm

    look out road builders (part 2)

    oh we cna gt them easy neough cause without roads they cant go get hard drives or technology at all

    HAHA yes sue road builders now they support terrorism

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Dave, 19 Jan 2010 @ 6:29am

    They most probably haven't gone all the way with this because our government currently wants ISPs to punish users (or at least send them a letter) for piracy etc. If ISPs cannot be held accountable under law for users actions then they have no obligation to do anything.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 20 Jan 2010 @ 11:57am

    So it's fine to have your users spew racial slurs, but if they mention factual government corruption, the ISP is still liable for libel?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Show Now: Copymouse
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.