by Mike Masnick
Mon, Sep 21st 2009 9:22am
Over the summer, we wrote about an important lawsuit under appeal at the Federal Circuit, Prometheus Laboratories v. Mayo Collaborative Services, which looked at whether or not basic medical tests could be patented -- in this case, a method of calibrating medicine dosages based on a patient's metabolic response. Doctors were pretty freaked out by this idea that you could patent a method that seemed like basic science. While a lower court agreed, the appeals court has gone the other way and said that the method is patentable. The patent holders insisted that this patent was necessary because if it didn't get the patent it "would likely have a chilling effect on future medical discovery." That, of course, is ridiculous. The idea that you need a patent on basic diagnostic procedures to have people come up with them is ridiculous. Some think that there's a decent chance the Supreme Court will take up this case as well, but until then, we've got yet another case of patents being used to actively put lives at risk by telling doctors they can't do basic diagnostic procedures without paying up.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- TPP Will Override Five Years Of Democratic Discussion About Software Patents In New Zealand
- Contrary To What You've Heard, TPP Will Undermine US Law -- Including Supreme Court Decisions
- Obviously, No One Ever Would Have Thought Of Remote Controlled Sex Toys Without This Patent
- Be Happy: Software Patents Are Rapidly Disappearing Thanks To The Supreme Court
- Supreme Court Sends Case On Gene Patents Back To Appeals Court Following Rejection Of Diagnostic Patents