by Mike Masnick
Tue, May 19th 2009 6:50pm
Back in February, Universal Music got slapped down for its highly questionable attempt to sue the investors in Veoh for the actions performed by the company itself. We've never quite understood why the major record labels have tried, repeatedly, to sue the investors of sites and services they don't like. It's hard to see how that's justified, because if those investors are found liable, it would create a huge liability for any investor. Investors don't have day-to-day control over a company, and trying to make them liable for the actions of the company makes no sense. However, not only was Universal shot down in this attempt, but it tried to refile the lawsuit against the investors... and was shot down yet again. The judge noted that Universal Music presented no evidence as to why the investors should somehow be responsible for the actions of the company and tossed out the lawsuits against them again. Hopefully this wakes up EMI, who recently sued the investors in a small startup as well.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- German Court Rules Parents Must Out Their Family Members For Copyright Trolls Or Pay Fines Themselves
- FBI Arrests Creator Of Remote Access Tool, Rather Than Those Abusing It To Commit Crime
- German Judge Fines Father Because He Didn't Tell His Kid Not To Engage In Piracy
- Supreme Court Asks White House To Weigh In On Dancing Baby Fair Use Case
- New Decision In Dancing Baby DMCA Takedown Case -- And Everything Is Still A Mess