by Mike Masnick
Mon, May 18th 2009 5:39pm
Following Craigslist's decision to cave in to demands and start monitoring every "adult services" post on its platform, the Wall Street Journal is running a rather odd article suggesting that this somehow shows "the perils of self-policing" by a community, and suggesting that such crowdsourced reviews don't work. Except, that's a gross misreading of the actual situation. The crowdsourcing worked just fine. The issue was that members of the Craigslist community didn't have a problem with the ads in question. Those who did have problems were grandstanding politicians looking to get elected to higher office. If anything, it doesn't show the perils of self-policing, it shows the perils of getting caught in the sights of grandstanding politicians who need to whip up populist anger even if they have no legal basis to do so.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- The Unbelievably True Story Of How Craigslist Murdered Over 100 People
- Former Bush Press Secretary Says The Answer To Mass Shootings Is... More Domestic Surveillance
- Appeals Court Issues Fantastic 1st Amendment Ruling Against Censorious Sheriff Thomas Dart In His Crusade Against The Internet
- NY Times Gets It Right: Officials Calling For More Surveillance Are Proven Liars; Don't Listen To Them
- Twitter's Excuse For Shutting Down Services That Highlight Deleted Politicians' Tweets Is Painfully Ridiculous