Techno Slap Chop Informercial Remix... Infringement Or Brilliant?
from the welcome-to-the-world-today dept
Xanthir writes in to point to this Guardian article about viral videos that highlights the "Rap Chop" video that's currently got over a million views on YouTube. If you haven't seen it (and I hadn't), it's basically taking a silly infomercial for an "as seen on TV" chopping device, which you can see here:
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: advertising, content, copyright, remix, slapchop
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
" The video is almost certainly infringing on the original, but it's yet another example where it would be a bad idea to try to enforce the copyright (and it doesn't look like the company has even tried to do so, which is good)."
It would be a stupid PR move on theier part. They need all the good PR since Vince had the blow up with his 3,000.00 call girl in a hotel lobby.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
not to derail the thread but yeah, in a $700 dollar a night hotel room . . . could he possibly be making that kinda bank shillen for sham-wows?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Actually his fortune was derived from ever failing to get a haircut that didn't look like he got it from a retarded monkey. Is it me, or is that guy Christopher Titus' evil jizz mopping twin?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
that got a real, middle of the office, LOL outta me . . . thanks!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Although, what would be a fair move in that situation?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
slap chop, my ass.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
If someone took a brand new Chevy Malibu, disassembled it, hacked it up, and made some crazy sculpture out of it's parts, it wouldn't be an infringement on Chevy. Sure you can tell it was once a Chevy Malibu, but it is not any more. Just like Rap Chop used to be a Slap Chop infomercial, but it is not any more. The artist has created something new from the parts of the original product.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Techno?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Techno?
Heh. My bad. Shows what I know.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Techno?
Mike had it correct;
Electro/breaks is a form of Techno which can also be referred to as Ghetto-Techno. Just like Darkwave is a form of New-wave & Post-Punk. Synthpop is also a form of New-wave.
The same could be said about all the various versions of Country, Soul, Classical and even Industrial -- EBM anyone?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Techno?
however, given the specificity and exactness of this scholarly blog, I would expect that we could do better than to not confuse the layman's uber-genre with the enthusiasts sub-genres. it's a slippery slope to the lowest common denominator.
and, Ghetto-tech is much different than your average electro. It includes hard Detroit techno, speeds it up and usually includes eye-raising lyrics. (see DJ Assault)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Techno?
Yeah, before you know it, we'll be calling everything "music".
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Assigning value to infringement
Guess that logic also favors copying the Slap Chop device and using the 'creativity of remixed content' to advertise it.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Assigning value to infringement
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
I predict any legal issue will come from him claiming monetary damages for using his likeness, not from the company selling the product.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
If only advertisment could be this good. But, then, it would be "norm" and we would be as tired of it as we are with the other.
About the infringment, if they sued, that would only make them look even worse, and would actualy give the Remix MUCH more attention. Not good PR, at all.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
If I were the slap chop guys,
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Remixed Winston Churchill
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lW6jW9y59JY
Pretty cool. But the more I think about it, big content is screwed. It's becoming more apparent daily just how little creativity is applied in commercial music. And now the entire Antares tool set is well within reach of the general hobbiest. It seems players in music are attempting to bottle up creativity, but instead of playing ball, the creative element is continually moving to the public domain. Good.
The lyrics that the artist deliberately chose may be something of a long coming warning:
Lift up your hearts, all will come right. Out of depths of sorrow and of sacrifice, we'll be born again (to) the glory of mankind.
This is the message to all states and nations, bound or free. We can not get free. Our Deliverance will come. When it will come, but nothing is more certain that every trace of Hitler's footsteps, every stain of his infected and corroding fingers will be sponged and purged and, if need be, blasted (Oh Yeah!) from the surface of the Earth (Surface of the Earth)!
This this, My lords and Gentlemen, is the message which we send forth today:
Lift up your hearts, all will come right. Out of depths of sorrow and of sacrifice. We'll be born again (to) the glory of mankind.
This is the message to all states and nations, bound or free: Lift up your hearts, all will come right. Out of depths of sorrow and of sacrifice. We'll be born again (to) the glory of mankind.
This is the message to all states and nations, bound or free.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
"This post is a remix of techdirt's oft-told theories that non-enforcement of IP rights provides value, that is, free IP is just altogether GOOD!!
Guess that logic also favors copying the Slap Chop device and using the 'creativity of remixed content' to advertise it."
What value has Vince added since the Hooker incident? How much did he De-value it because of it? The video parody has bought new attention to a lame infomercial and his products.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Compare that to the actual commercial and tell me what one you would rather watch.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Techno Remix: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGooQ8yYC0c
Original: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZwVaLFbLFOM
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Cillit Bang
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Artist is Steve Porter by the way
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Steve is a genius...
Yes, he used a company's commercial to make a new "video" out of it, but really, what does Steve have to gain from this? He's not signing this track to a major record label. He's not using this video to promote his own product. He is not generating any income from what he has created...and to be honest, I wouldn't be surprised if he is actually HELPING Slap Chop sales. The video is not demeaning, slanderous or libelous in any way towards the Slap Chop or to that Vince guy (he's done enough lately to diminish his own reputation).
The only thing Steve has to gain from this is the number of hits he gets on YouTube, and perhaps a bit of exposure for his own musical production/DJ efforts (Steve is one of the most talented DJ/Producers in the world, if you ask me).
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Steve is a genius...
Indeed. But that doesn't matter. It's still infringement. It might help in a fair use defense, but the way copyright law works, none of what you mentioned above matters.
Ridiculous, right?
The video is not demeaning, slanderous or libelous in any way towards the Slap Chop or to that Vince guy (he's done enough lately to diminish his own reputation).
That's useful for defamation. But that's got nothing to do with copyright law.
The video is not demeaning, slanderous or libelous in any way towards the Slap Chop or to that Vince guy (he's done enough lately to diminish his own reputation).
That doesn't matter to the question of copyright infringement.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Slappin' your troubles away with slap chop!
ARGHHH, they totally need to pay the guy for this remix.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
I'll let you in on a secret. The reason I sent this in was because I was already infected with its rhythm and lyrics, and wanted only to spread the agony.
I've watched the video 20 times or more now. >_
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Happy Hardcore
Have a listen to one of the Bonkers discs - Happy Hardcore has its roots in the raver culture of happy things, lollies and dance parties.. :)
But either way I liked the music in the remix. Neat .. kudos to the maker. I hope the copyright holder lets it stay.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
His other infomercial
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CztvSpKdCeY
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Rap chop
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
hahahahahaha
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Techno Slap Chop Informercial Remix... Infringement Or Brilliant?
The question is now irrelevant as the Slap Chop folks have now fully endorsed Steve Porter's ingenious "Rap Chop" song and video and are using it as an actual commercial!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
youtube poop raven gets plastic surgery
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
youtube poop
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
I liked the remix
I truly liked this remix :C But it was all about autotune, right? https://autotune.online/
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Add Your Comment
Add A Reply