How To Fool Apple's Arbitrary App Censors: Make Your App Look Cute

from the it's-all-about-appearances dept

Chris Wilcox, from Alkali Media, sends in (without a link, forcing us to go searching...) his story about his company created a somewhat crude iPhone app called (appropriately) "Crudebox." The app is nothing special -- just a sound box of semi-crude noises, not unlike some other apps out there. They were a bit surprised when the app was rejected for "objectionable" material. So, they reskinned the interface, to make it look a lot nicer, called it Prudebox and resubmitted it. The actual app (and all the sounds) were identical. And... of course, in Apple's arbitrary wisdom, they approved the new app and added it to the iPhone App Store.
crudetoprude_ss
So, apparently the lesson for those of you who have had Apple's arbitrary app censors reject your app: just reskin it to make it look less threatening.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 27th, 2009 @ 2:18pm

    I'll be willing to bet that the baby-shaking app won't win over much of a "forgiveness-base" by changing it (pun-intended) to be a cuter baby. Just my hunch, however....

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    identicon
    english majore, Apr 27th, 2009 @ 2:27pm

    I didn't know they had arbitary censors

    I was sure that they were Arbitrary ones...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    identicon
    english majore, Apr 27th, 2009 @ 2:29pm

    mike pwned

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    identicon
    James, Apr 27th, 2009 @ 2:42pm

    Crapple strikes again

    Just remember you don't own your iPhone... you're just borrowing it from Crapple.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    identicon
    jguil, Apr 27th, 2009 @ 2:43pm

    i guess they have no concern with the non-disclosure agreements on developer rejections

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    identicon
    anon, Apr 27th, 2009 @ 2:45pm

    Re: Crapple strikes again

    kind of like how you are borrowing your intelligence? .. yes it is obvious!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    identicon
    Periphera, Apr 27th, 2009 @ 2:46pm

    "Reskinning" can make a difference

    I'm not trying to argue that Apple isn't being arbitrary here, but this seems like a poor case to call them out on.

    Changing "Vomit" to "Sicky", "Wet Fart" to "Big Toot", "Peeing" to "Piddle", etc. are the standard sort of shifts you would expect to get around being too crude/offensive.

    Sure, changing the labels without changing the sound effects is a pretty shallow shift, but it does make the app less "objectionable".

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 27th, 2009 @ 2:47pm

    it's not the appearance, try the vulgarity. The original had peeing, fart, vomit, etc. Approved one labeled them less crudely

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  
    identicon
    PRMan, Apr 27th, 2009 @ 3:09pm

    The next test...

    The next test is to submit the first app with the labels of the second and the second app with the labels of the first.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 27th, 2009 @ 3:39pm

    So, I'm curious... would relabeling a rape game as "non-consensual adult fun time" would make it more acceptable? Everyone loves adult fun time! Yay!

    Time to port "Custer's Revenge" from my Atari!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11.  
    icon
    Mike (profile), Apr 27th, 2009 @ 3:45pm

    Re: I didn't know they had arbitary censors

    Fixed, thanks. Generally speaking, by the way, we appreciate typo corrections, but could do without the attitude. We all make mistakes at times, and we're happy to have people point them out.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  12.  
    identicon
    english majore, Apr 27th, 2009 @ 4:00pm

    Re: Re: I didn't know they had arbitary censors

    no attitude mike, just all fun : )

    I read every day

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  13.  
    identicon
    Overcast, Apr 27th, 2009 @ 4:22pm

    har har

    Shows who the 'prude' is, doesn't it? Glad I didn't waste cash on this over controlled phone.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  14.  
    identicon
    Overcast, Apr 27th, 2009 @ 4:24pm

    it's not the appearance, try the vulgarity. The original had peeing, fart, vomit, etc. Approved one labeled them less crudely

    Yeah, but the point is - why is Apple trying to dictate what apps you can load on your phone? It's a joke app - crude is what it's supposed to be.

    It's past the point of 'protecting the stability' of the phone or whatever. It's more or less "corporate socialism".

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  15.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 27th, 2009 @ 8:03pm

    Re: Crapple strikes again

    Same goes with software, have you ever read your agreements or are you telepathically connected to the internet and don't use a computer?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  16.  
    identicon
    JT, Apr 27th, 2009 @ 8:31pm

    Re:

    I'm glad you didn't either. The other 15,000+ apps available wouldn't fill your void that CrudeBox would.

    I've never been much on Apple because of pricing, I looked at MacBooks and laughed at the price. However, after they dropped the price on the iPhone I was happy to pick one up. AT&T hasn't been too bad either which was my main drawback when I did buy it. It does pretty much everything I was looking for and I looked at and read about a lot of phones for several months. Personally, I can live without CrudeBox... PrudeBox, for that matter.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  17.  
    identicon
    JT, Apr 27th, 2009 @ 8:45pm

    Slow Day?

    I really don't see these as completely sick. I guess wet fart is a bit gross sounding. What I really don't get why Techdirt even posted it, slow day?

    Mike, you usually have a decent argument whether I agree or not and if the labels were named the same I could probably see that point but they were changed. Put the same labels on PrudeBox or keep the Crudebox interface with the new labels and see what happens. It's a bit misleading since it just says "they reskinned the interface, to make it look a lot nicer" without any mention of the labels. You have to look at the, slightly hard to read, images to realize they were changed.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  18.  
    identicon
    JT, Apr 27th, 2009 @ 9:04pm

    Re:

    Because they own the app store? I agree, for the most part, about the content. It's not that bad, a bit gross in a few spots but not that bad.

    A more suitable argument would be to ask Apple to provide something like the ESRB if there were a demand for it. Then again I don't really look for stuff like this. I picked up a few soundboards like "That's What She Said" that just fell flat because it's not Michael Scott and really isn't funny without The Office context...obviously copyright issues there.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  19.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 27th, 2009 @ 10:41pm

    Re: "Reskinning" can make a difference

    Changing "Vomit" to "Sicky", "Wet Fart" to "Big Toot", "Peeing" to "Piddle", etc. are the standard sort of shifts you would expect to get around being too crude/offensive.

    It's exactly what you would do to make something "cuter", which is what the article said.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  20.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 27th, 2009 @ 10:45pm

    it's not the appearance, try the vulgarity. The original had peeing, fart, vomit, etc. Approved one labeled them less crudely

    The original also buttons dripping with green goo. The the approved one had little yellow flowers and a bunny rabbit. Awwww, look, isn't that just so cute?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  21.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 27th, 2009 @ 11:15pm

    iphone: WASTE OF TIME AND MONEY, Moving on.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  22.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 27th, 2009 @ 11:22pm

    Re: Slow Day?

    Put the same labels on PrudeBox or keep the Crudebox interface with the new labels and see what happens.

    The labels are part of the interface. If you put the CrudeBox labels on the PrudeBox it wouldn't be the PrudeBox.

    It's a bit misleading since it just says "they reskinned the interface, to make it look a lot nicer" without any mention of the labels.

    Considering that the labels are part of the interface, then how's that? Heck, he even included pictures of both interfaces with their labels, and you're saying that it was misleading? Give me a break, fan boi.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  23.  
    identicon
    mg, Apr 28th, 2009 @ 9:28am

    nothing that....

    Apple: Your turd has been rejected.
    Developer: We polished our turd.
    Apple: Thats better. You may now sell your turd on our site.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  24.  
    identicon
    Jason, Apr 28th, 2009 @ 10:39am

    Re:

    What exactly is the consideration if they were rejected?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  25.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 28th, 2009 @ 11:49am

    Re: Re: Slow Day?

    Considering that the labels are part of the interface, then how's that? Heck, he even included pictures of both interfaces with their labels, and you're saying that it was misleading? Give me a break, fan boi.

    I'm anti-Apple all the way (I only say this to keep off any "fan-boi" attack), but I have to agree with the person you are responding to. We have no clue what the reasons for not accepting the app were. It could have been the green drippy buttons, or the name of the app, but it could also have been the terms on those buttoms ("Wet Fart" etc).

    If the developer had JUST changed those strings, would the app have been accepted drippy buttons and all? It's not "arbitrary" to decline an app because it contains a string that is deemed inapropriate as much as it would be to decline it because it has green drippy buttons.

    Regardless of what we think is right, Apple does own and run the store. Anything that is sold there, regardless of who it is developed for reflects upon Apple first. They even push this as a selling point. The commercials for the iPhone with their "... there's an app for that" forward the idea that it is these 3rd party apps that make the iPhone such a great device. Perhaps they've decided that "toot" is okay, but "wet fart" is not. You might say that it is "arbitrary" but we all draw a line somewhere, they just choose to be more conservative.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  26.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 28th, 2009 @ 5:03pm

    Re: Re: Re: Slow Day?

    Regardless of what we think is right, Apple does own and run the store.

    Who said otherwise? Strawman down.

    Anything that is sold there, regardless of who it is developed for reflects upon Apple first.

    Then Apple sure must be a bad company because there are a lot of things there that aren't very nice, including PrudeBox. Eh?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  27.  
    identicon
    JT, Apr 29th, 2009 @ 7:39am

    Re: Re: Slow Day?

    Fan boi? You're an idiot. So I guess we're both something.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  28.  
    identicon
    JT, Apr 29th, 2009 @ 7:47am

    Re: Re: Re: Slow Day?

    I've never been much on Apple either (see a previous response to someone else). I think their prices are ridiculous and I'm glad to see the pricing brought out in the recent "I'm a PC" ads running.

    I do like the phone though and the drops in pricing worked for me. Still love my Zune too. But apparently if you own a device from a particular company you're a "fan boi" but I get a cool spelling.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  29.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 29th, 2009 @ 5:22pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Slow Day?

    But apparently if you own a device from a particular company you're a "fan boi" but I get a cool spelling.

    Nah, "fan boi" is a title you have to earn, like by being defensive of criticism of your adopted consumer product or company, often times to the point of even mischaracterizing such criticism. Congratulations.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  30.  
    identicon
    David, May 1st, 2009 @ 12:17pm

    A quick question about apple iphone downloader/purchaser user app data?

    Not sure where to post this, as I'm new to this. Quick question for iphone app developers/people who are in the know...

    Do apple developers/app writers get access to any consumer information (like e-mail address) for people who download their apps?

    Thank you.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This