by Mike Masnick
Wed, Apr 1st 2009 2:42pm
MediaShift points out that the folks at the TV show Fox & Friends have been found not guilty of defamation, after they repeated quotes from a parody news article that they assumed were true (though, even they admitted that the quotes sounded as if they could be from a parody). Basically, it turns out they were just gullible, not defamatory -- mainly because there was no specific malicious intent in repeating the parody info. While the court admitted that the gullibility was negligent and distasteful, that didn't rise to the level of malicious. If anything, the reputation hurt most by this incident isn't that of the guy suing for defamation... but that of the hosts of Fox & Friends.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Another Court Logically Concludes That Linking To Allegedly Defamatory Content Isn't Defamation
- European Patent Office Threatens Blogger With Defamation Lawsuit For Criticism
- Sorry Billy Mitchell, Cartoon Network Has A First Amendment Right To Parody You
- TVEyes Hit With Incredibly Restrictive Permanent Injunction By Court
- Fox, Exxon Trademark Spat Of Stupid Finally Ends After Two Years Of Dumb