by Mike Masnick
Wed, Apr 1st 2009 2:42pm
MediaShift points out that the folks at the TV show Fox & Friends have been found not guilty of defamation, after they repeated quotes from a parody news article that they assumed were true (though, even they admitted that the quotes sounded as if they could be from a parody). Basically, it turns out they were just gullible, not defamatory -- mainly because there was no specific malicious intent in repeating the parody info. While the court admitted that the gullibility was negligent and distasteful, that didn't rise to the level of malicious. If anything, the reputation hurt most by this incident isn't that of the guy suing for defamation... but that of the hosts of Fox & Friends.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Donald Trump's Lawsuit Against Univision Is Absolutely Hilarious
- Researcher Headed To Australian Supreme Court In Attempt To Hold Google Responsible For Posts At Ripoff Reports [Updated]
- A Lesson In How Not To Do A Defamation Threat, Courtesy Of Lawyer Casey Cummings
- Court Says Dish's Hopper Technology Does Not Infringe On Copyrights
- Paris, France To Sue Fox News For Being Fox News