by Mike Masnick
Wed, Apr 1st 2009 2:42pm
MediaShift points out that the folks at the TV show Fox & Friends have been found not guilty of defamation, after they repeated quotes from a parody news article that they assumed were true (though, even they admitted that the quotes sounded as if they could be from a parody). Basically, it turns out they were just gullible, not defamatory -- mainly because there was no specific malicious intent in repeating the parody info. While the court admitted that the gullibility was negligent and distasteful, that didn't rise to the level of malicious. If anything, the reputation hurt most by this incident isn't that of the guy suing for defamation... but that of the hosts of Fox & Friends.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- ALEC Threatens To Sue Critics That Point Out It Helps Keep Broadband Uncompetitive
- Court Dismisses Prenda's Ridiculous Defamation Lawsuit Against Internet Critics & Guy Whose Signature It Forged
- Court Adds Much-Needed Element Of Malice To Nova Scotia's Terrible Cyberbullying Law
- Court Says Dish's Hopper Technology Does Not Infringe On Copyrights
- Paris, France To Sue Fox News For Being Fox News