by Mike Masnick
Tue, Mar 17th 2009 3:29am
Last month, we wrote about how the recording industry association in Ireland, IRMA, was sending around vaguely threatening letters to ISPs, telling them that they had to abide by the settlement terms made by the ISP Eircom, which included a three strikes policy and, according to IRMA -- but not Eircom -- an agreement not to protest should IRMA convince the gov't that certain sites, such as The Pirate Bay, should be blocked altogether. Luckily, the folks at those ISPs recognize they're under no legal obligation to do this, and as reader eoinmonty alerts us, those ISPs have now made that clear to IRMA, sending the group a letter, saying that the legal threat implied by IRMA's original letter was spurious, and the ISPs believe they're just fine under current European law.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- ISPs Are Now Forcing Cord Cutters To Subscribe To TV If They Want To Avoid Usage Caps
- French National Assembly Votes (Sorta) To Finally Kill Its Three Strikes Hadopi Program
- As Broadband Usage Caps Expand, Complaints To The FCC Skyrocket
- Silverpush Stops Using Sneaky, Inaudible TV Audio Tracking Beacons After FTC Warning
- As ISPs Push Harder On Usage Caps, House Pushes Bill Preventing The FCC From Doing Anything About It