by Mike Masnick
Fri, Jan 23rd 2009 5:21pm
One of the more ridiculous lawsuits we saw last year was smaller newspaper chain GateHouse suing the NY Times for linking to its site with a headline and brief excerpt on the Boston Globe website. Romenesko points us to news of the NY Times response, which seems pretty damning for GateHouse. Specifically, they show emails from GateHouse officials pointing out that identical activities are clearly fair use, and another email where GateHouse tells one of its own sites to immediately stop doing the exact same thing that it's accusing the NYT of doing. In other words, GateHouse pretty clearly knows that an excerpt, a headline and a link are fair use -- but still went after the NY Times for doing the same thing it did.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Elsevier Keeps Whac'ing Moles In Trying To Take Down Repository Of Academic Papers
- Do You Own What You Own? Not So Much Anymore, Thanks To Copyright
- Techdirt Reading List: No Law: Intellectual Property In The Image Of An Absolute First Amendment
- Trump's Incomprehensible 'Cyber' Policy: 'Make Cyber Great Again'
- French Police Report On Paris Attacks Shows No Evidence Of Encryption... So NY Times Invents Evidence Itself