by Mike Masnick
Tue, Jan 27th 2009 7:13pm
At the beginning of January, I thought it was amusing that Verizon was launching its own backup service for a stunning $31/month (with a limit of 50GB of backup storage). That seemed fairly ridiculous, given that you could get an unlimited backup service from Carbonite or Mozy for $5/month, or using JungleDisk with Amazon's S3 for exceptionally low prices as well (depending on how much you use -- but 50GB comes in at way less than $31). Now comes the news that Comcast is also launching its own backup service, with a few different price points, but starting at $5/month for only 10GB and going up from there. It's not a bad service to offer -- and, surely, Verizon and Comcast see these as ways to lock in consumers, since it now has possession of their backup data -- but it seems quite odd that these companies would offer "value added services" where the prices are more expensive than rolling your own, which doesn't come with the lock-in. And, as noted, with Comcast, using the service counts against their new broadband caps, so there isn't even a benefit there. These ISPs seem to be missing the point of these value added services. If you want to get people to use them, they should actually add value.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Comcast: The Economics Of Offering Cheaper, Better Streaming TV Service 'Unproven'
- After Ripping Off Cities, States For Years, Verizon Makes Some Familiar Broadband Promises To Boston
- CenturyLink Claims Broadband Caps Improve The 'Internet Experience' And Empower Consumers
- Open Access Idaho Broadband Network Lets Customers Switch To A New ISP In Seconds
- ISPs Are Now Forcing Cord Cutters To Subscribe To TV If They Want To Avoid Usage Caps