by Mike Masnick
Tue, Jan 6th 2009 1:47am
One of the biggest problems with various "three strikes" or "graduated response" plans that involve ISPs slowing, degrading or removing internet connections from those accused of file sharing is the fact that they're based on accusations of file sharing, rather than actual proof and conviction. One of the most draconian of such plans has shown up in New Zealand, where the country's copyright minister yelled at those who pointed out how problematic the law was -- insisting that ISPs need to be responsible for stopping file sharing. Of course, many musicians recognize how problematic this is as well, and a bunch of them are getting together to protest the law in New Zealand, pointing out that "guilt upon accusation" is a horrible policy, and, even as musicians, they don't want such actions to be taken in their name.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- French National Assembly Votes (Sorta) To Finally Kill Its Three Strikes Hadopi Program
- New Zealand Government Trying To Streamroller TPP Through Ratification Without Proper Scrutiny Or Public Input
- New Zealand Says Laws To Implement TPP Will Be Passed Now, Despite US Uncertainties, And Won't Be Rolled Back Even If TPP Fails
- Three Strikes System In Australia 'Too Costly' For Industry; Seems Piracy Not Such A Massive Problem After All
- Countries Sign The TPP... Whatever Happened To The 'Debate' We Were Promised Before Signing?