by Mike Masnick
Tue, Nov 4th 2008 7:54am
Following on our earlier story demonstrating the calibration errors on ES&S e-voting machines in West Virginia, comes this report that notes the calibration controls are not protected and accessible to anyone. In other words, a pollworker or even a voter could modify the calibration to make it more difficult to vote for a particular candidate. While the overall risk may be minimal (voters would still see whether the correct candidate was highlighted), it could significantly impact voters' confidence with the accuracy of these machines and the sanctity of the election. It's still rather amazing how many stories we see on a near daily basis concerning how badly these machines are built.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Tempting Fate: Pittsburgh Election Officials Insist Their E-Voting Machines Can't Be Hacked
- Bruce Schneier Sounds The Alarm: If You're Worried About Russians Hacking, Maybe Help Fix Voting Machine Security
- Australian Electoral Commission Refuses To Allow Researchers To Check E-Voting Software
- Cause For Concern: 'Experimental' Patches Applied To Ohio Voting Machines Without Certification
- Why Isn't There A Central Database Of E-Voting Problems?