by Mike Masnick
Mon, Sep 15th 2008 10:43am
We've long known that the boundary between US law enforcement and the enforcement wings of certain lobbyist organizations like the RIAA is way too blurry, but TorrentFreak is raising some important questions about why the police will call in RIAA investigators on certain cases, such as one where a speeding stop in Illinois resulted in a cop calling in the RIAA after spindles of writeable DVDs and CDs was found in the car. While the RIAA and law enforcement have a history of working closely together (and many people go back and forth between the two), the RIAA is still a highly biased party here, and shouldn't be involved in investigations where it has a personal stake. While some politicians are trying to turn US law enforcement into the private police of the entertainment industry, that doesn't mean that police should just consider RIAA investigators their peers. So can anyone explain why RIAA investigators should be allowed to be involved in such cases and why no one's called US law enforcement on things like this before?
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Why The DMCA's Notice & Takedown Already Has First Amendment Problems... And RIAA/MPAA Want To Make That Worse
- Nation's Police Chiefs Disagree With Trump's New Tough On Crime Executive Orders
- Court: Unsupported Assertions And Broad Language Aren't Enough To Support Cell Phone Searches
- New Report On Encryption Confirms There's More Of It, But Still Not Much Of A Problem For Law Enforcement
- Ding Dong: Silly Six Strikes Copyright Infringement Scheme Is Dead