Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

1.  

   

   John Duncan Yoyo, Sep 3rd, 2008 @ 7:47am

   
   

   Been There Done That

   Fails on prior use timed deals were done at K-Mart in the seventies. Anyone remember a Blue light special?

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

2.  

   

   hegemon13, Sep 3rd, 2008 @ 7:59am

   
   

   Re: Been There Done That

   But...but...Amazon is doing it *ONLINE*!

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

3.  

   

   Anonymous Coward, Sep 3rd, 2008 @ 8:03am

   
   

   No More WootOffs?

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

4.  

   

   Patent Whore, Sep 3rd, 2008 @ 8:10am

   
   

   Sorry...

   I have patented the idea of patenting obvious ideas. They are clearly infringing!

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

5.  

   

   y8, Sep 3rd, 2008 @ 8:20am

   
   

   woot

   The woot off is not dependant on whether you take action on a previous item, and it is not time dependent, it is product availability dependant.

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

6.  

   

   UUUD444, Sep 3rd, 2008 @ 8:39am

   
   

   Patents in general

   I personally think all software-based patents should be dissolved. For one thing, like this one, they tend to be way too general. Seriously, offering a new item up for sale on a cyclical basis? How is that a unique idea?
   
   Further, I think any patent covering an item that is not currently in production should be dissolved. Patenting an idea to prevent it from being formed by someone else, while doing nothing with said patent is a practice that should be stopped.

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

7.  

   

   Anonymous Coward, Sep 3rd, 2008 @ 8:58am

   
   

   The patent covers a system and method that is much more nuanced than simply a string of time limited offers (e.g., HSN, QVC).

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

8.  

   

   edgebilliards (profile), Sep 3rd, 2008 @ 9:11am

   
   

   software patent?

   is this a software or a business method patent? i'm not super-knowledgeable, but it kinda walks the line b/w the two.
   
   the code to offer sales is a little obvious, but the idea of doing it is kinda sorta not so much so.

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

9.  

   

   SoyChicken Little, Sep 3rd, 2008 @ 9:30am

   
   

   Read the patent details...

   ... and you will see that it's fairly well defined and pertains to their use of goldbox daily deals which I think is unique and patent-worthy. They put a lot of time and research into developing it, and I don't think it would be fair for other online e-commerce entities to straight copy it.
   
   Yes I agree that there are some software patents that are so generically defined that they are meaningless, but in fairness, I don't think this is one of them.

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

10.  

    

    StrawMan, Sep 3rd, 2008 @ 9:54am

    
    

    Re: Read the patent details...

    You know what else was innovative and worthy of a patent by those standards? The online shopping cart, rubber wheels, pneumatic tires, a digital volume control, speedometers that show both MP/h and KM/h.
    
    OOH! I'll patent the fuel gauge that shows both gallons and liters so you know how much you'd be getting screwed if you had to pay by the liter.
    
    This is fun. I'm going to find other things that people are doing, but a minor, but fairly obvious twist on it and patent the hell out of it...or stop trolling...whichever.

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

11.  

    

    Anonymous Coward, Sep 3rd, 2008 @ 10:06am

    
    

    Re: Re: Read the patent details...

    "Strawman" is an apt moniker since you appear to be quite adept at creating irrelevant and inaccurate strawmen.
    
    As the subject title notes, try reading the patent before waxing poetic on what you seem to feel are failings of the current law.

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

12.  

    

    Innocent Gosling, Sep 3rd, 2008 @ 11:42am

    
    

    Re: Read the patent details...

    Goldbox Daily Deals?
    
    What is that, like, "free nude pic of the day"?

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

13.  

    

    ChurchHatesTucker (profile), Sep 3rd, 2008 @ 11:53am

    
    

    Re: Been There Done That

    "Anyone remember a Blue light special?"
    
    Or the "Limited time offer! Call now!" commercials that have been around since at least that long? (Granted, I doubt they actually time those, but the concept is clearly there.)
    
    Where the hell do they find these patent examiners?

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

14.  

    

    Anonymous Coward, Sep 3rd, 2008 @ 12:00pm

    
    

    Re: Re: Been There Done That

    the zoo pays them to take away the ugly monkeys.

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

15.  

    

    JT, Sep 3rd, 2008 @ 12:36pm

    
    

    Re: Read the patent details...

    Oh yeah they put millions of hours into taking another persons idea that's been around for a long time and expanding on it.
    
    Don't get me wrong I have found myself almost solely relying on Amazon for a large portion of things I buy and even have Prime. It just amazes me that there are Kool-Aid drinkers in every crowd even Amazons.

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

16.  

    

    Anonymous Coward, Sep 3rd, 2008 @ 3:18pm

    
    

    Re:

    I was thinking the samething

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

17.  

    

    Anonymous Coward, Sep 3rd, 2008 @ 8:39pm

    
    

    Re: Re: Re: Read the patent details...

    "Strawman" is an apt moniker since you appear to be quite adept at creating irrelevant and inaccurate strawmen.

    Perhaps you should learn what a straw man argument and sarcasm are and the difference between the two so that your comments don't appear to coming from a complete idiot.

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Add Your Comment